[PD] FIR~ convolution array length bug

2010-08-22 Thread Ludwig Maes 
The FIR~ object apparently only allows convolution lengths =3, I
couldnt get it to work with length 2. probably some offset problem? or
hardcoded assumption that it will be longer than 2?

Greetings,
Ludwig

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] FIR~ convolution array length bug

2010-08-22 Thread Andy Farnell 
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 15:38:50 +0200
Ludwig Maes ludwig.m...@gmail.com wrote:

 probably some offset problem? or
 hardcoded assumption that it will be longer than 2?

Convolution doesn't really make much sense for 1 
where it degenerates to simple multiplication.


-- 
Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list