Re: [PD] Fwd: Disabling of packages to build...

2010-08-01 Thread meino . cramer
Hi,

ok, I will try it again...fingers crossed...


Funs Seelen funssee...@gmail.com [10-08-01 05:20]:
 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Funs Seelen funssee...@gmail.com
 Date: 2010/7/31
 Subject: Re: [PD] Disabling of packages to build...
 To: meino.cra...@gmx.de
 
 
 
 
   2010/7/31 meino.cra...@gmx.de
 
  Hello Funs,
 
  Funs Seelen funssee...@gmail.com [10-07-31 22:28]:
   Hello Meino,
  
   2010/7/31 meino.cra...@gmx.de
  
Hi,
   
 while fighting for a successful compilation of Pd-0.41.4-extended
 the build process falls over a certain package which I have now
 decided to exclude.
   
 Where can I disable the build and install of packages from
 Pd-extended?
   
What do you mean with packages? Building pd depends on some packages
  (as
   I recently learned for example tk8.*-dev). You can't exclude them, but
  you
   just need to install them:
  
   $ sudo apt-get install the_package_i_need
  
   If you mean libraries or objects editing Makefile might be helpful.
  
   $ nano Makefile
  
   But then I would rather build pd-0.42-5 and install the external
  libraries
   you need or listen to Hans and build his latest release candidate (I
  don't
   know where he hid the source code). 0.42-5 makes editing a little easier.
 
   I checked out pd-extended-0.42 (release code) and tried several
   times to compile/installed it but it failed due to errors, which
   are not based on missing dependencies. And finally I gave up.
 
   Now I tried the stable pd-extended release and again fall over
   packages not compiling.
 
   I am frustrated about that.
 
  I can understand.
 
 
   I think I gave it up finally.
 
  If you think you gave up and you're not sure 100% about that here are
 some possible solutions:
 
 - Quit working on it for now and wait at least until tomorrow;
 
 - Tell us what system you are running (maybe others have had the same
 problem before or have an already-built-package for your platform) 
 - write down the output of the errors;
 
 - Download pd-0.42-5 http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/software.html, install
 tk8.5-dev (if using linux) and build it (see README.txt) 
 - install the libraries you need afterwards.


 I am on Gentoo-Linux, which I freshly installed a month ago. With
 the Gentoo system I had previously I experimented with pd-overlay
 and ebuilds, which are not supported by the Gentoo crew, which tends
 to make things more complicated than easier.
 The current system has to last longer than the previous one, so I
 willl no longer unmask packages or install overlays and ebuilds
 from other sources than from the Gentoo-crew itsself.

 In case of the need to install things not supported by the
 Gentoo-crew those have to compile out-of-the-box (classical way
 of installing which only system dependency is of being on
 a linux box instead of makeing diffderences what distribution
 is used.)

 By the way: pd-extended searches for dpkg-* executables and than
 thinks of being on Debian and installs everything into /usr/bin
 instead of /usr/local/bin.
 My opinion is, that this logic is not working in every case. Gentoo
 offers dpkg-* utils also. The result is that pd-extended gets
 installed into places, which are only for ebuilds.
 (Takes me some time to figure out, whether everything wants
 to go to /usr...)
 As long as there are no official ebuilds for Gentoo, pd-extended
 should keep its fingers off /usr.
 If the distribution cannot figured out 100% surely, break the installation
 process or ask the user for help.
 The existence or not-existence of certain tools is not strong logic.

 Only my two cents, your currency may vary... ;)

 ---

 I compiled pd-0.42-5 from the link you gave me, and it
 compiles/installes well.
 Unfortunately I have no clue, how install the rest, which makes the
 now installed pd-vanilla into pd-extended...


 Best regards,
  mcc





   Thanks for all help I got here.
 
   bye
 
   Best regards,
   mcc
 
  
  
 Thank you very much for any help in advance!
 Best regards,
 mcc
   
I hope this somehow is an answer to your question. If not I'm sorry for
  not
   understanding your question right.
  
  
   
   
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
   
 
   ___
   Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
   UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
  http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
 
 
 

 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] Fwd: Disabling of packages to build...

2010-08-01 Thread Funs Seelen
2010/8/1 meino.cra...@gmx.de

 Hi,

 ok, I will try it again...fingers crossed...


 Funs Seelen funssee...@gmail.com [10-08-01 05:20]:
  -- Forwarded message --
  From: Funs Seelen funssee...@gmail.com
  Date: 2010/7/31
  Subject: Re: [PD] Disabling of packages to build...
  To: meino.cra...@gmx.de
 
 
 
 
2010/7/31 meino.cra...@gmx.de
 
   Hello Funs,
  
   Funs Seelen funssee...@gmail.com [10-07-31 22:28]:
Hello Meino,
   
2010/7/31 meino.cra...@gmx.de
   
 Hi,

  while fighting for a successful compilation of Pd-0.41.4-extended
  the build process falls over a certain package which I have now
  decided to exclude.

  Where can I disable the build and install of packages from
  Pd-extended?

 What do you mean with packages? Building pd depends on some
 packages
   (as
I recently learned for example tk8.*-dev). You can't exclude them,
 but
   you
just need to install them:
   
$ sudo apt-get install the_package_i_need
   
If you mean libraries or objects editing Makefile might be
 helpful.
   
$ nano Makefile
   
But then I would rather build pd-0.42-5 and install the external
   libraries
you need or listen to Hans and build his latest release candidate (I
   don't
know where he hid the source code). 0.42-5 makes editing a little
 easier.
  
I checked out pd-extended-0.42 (release code) and tried several
times to compile/installed it but it failed due to errors, which
are not based on missing dependencies. And finally I gave up.
  
Now I tried the stable pd-extended release and again fall over
packages not compiling.
  
I am frustrated about that.
  
   I can understand.
 
 
I think I gave it up finally.
  
   If you think you gave up and you're not sure 100% about that here are
  some possible solutions:
 
  - Quit working on it for now and wait at least until tomorrow;
 
  - Tell us what system you are running (maybe others have had the same
  problem before or have an already-built-package for your platform) 
  - write down the output of the errors;
 
  - Download pd-0.42-5 
  http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/software.htmlhttp://crca.ucsd.edu/%7Emsp/software.html,
 install
  tk8.5-dev (if using linux) and build it (see README.txt) 
  - install the libraries you need afterwards.
 

  I am on Gentoo-Linux, which I freshly installed a month ago. With
  the Gentoo system I had previously I experimented with pd-overlay
  and ebuilds, which are not supported by the Gentoo crew, which tends
  to make things more complicated than easier.
  The current system has to last longer than the previous one, so I
  willl no longer unmask packages or install overlays and ebuilds
  from other sources than from the Gentoo-crew itsself.

  In case of the need to install things not supported by the
  Gentoo-crew those have to compile out-of-the-box (classical way
  of installing which only system dependency is of being on
  a linux box instead of makeing diffderences what distribution
  is used.)

  By the way: pd-extended searches for dpkg-* executables and than
  thinks of being on Debian and installs everything into /usr/bin
  instead of /usr/local/bin.
  My opinion is, that this logic is not working in every case. Gentoo
  offers dpkg-* utils also. The result is that pd-extended gets
  installed into places, which are only for ebuilds.
  (Takes me some time to figure out, whether everything wants
  to go to /usr...)
  As long as there are no official ebuilds for Gentoo, pd-extended
  should keep its fingers off /usr.
  If the distribution cannot figured out 100% surely, break the installation
  process or ask the user for help.
  The existence or not-existence of certain tools is not strong logic.

  Only my two cents, your currency may vary... ;)

  ---

  I compiled pd-0.42-5 from the link you gave me, and it
  compiles/installes well.
  Unfortunately I have no clue, how install the rest, which makes the
  now installed pd-vanilla into pd-extended...


http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/trunk/
Here you can download several external libraries. Some may install easy,
some may not. That's why the community came up with the 'template' (also in
the externals-folder) to create a standard for libraries. Maybe in somewhere
future all libraries will install the same way.
It's a hell of a job to install all libraries pd-extended contains, but I
guess there's no need for that. Pd-extended loads a bunch of externals every
time you'll probably never use. It's easy though to have them all installed
but personally I seemed to use almost only vanilla-objects. Since I use the
same version you just installed I even know better what's available for pd.
The only disadvantage of not having pd-extended I can think of is when you
download someone else's patch and the only information you get is that all
objects are included in pd-extended.

So whether you can use it the way as described above or you 

Re: [PD] Fwd: Disabling of packages to build...

2010-08-01 Thread Funs Seelen
   I am on Gentoo-Linux, which I freshly installed a month ago. With
the Gentoo system I had previously I experimented with pd-overlay
and ebuilds, which are not supported by the Gentoo crew, which tends
to make things more complicated than easier.
The current system has to last longer than the previous one, so I
willl no longer unmask packages or install overlays and ebuilds
from other sources than from the Gentoo-crew itsself.
  
In case of the need to install things not supported by the
Gentoo-crew those have to compile out-of-the-box (classical way
of installing which only system dependency is of being on
a linux box instead of makeing diffderences what distribution
is used.)
  
By the way: pd-extended searches for dpkg-* executables and than
thinks of being on Debian and installs everything into /usr/bin
instead of /usr/local/bin.
My opinion is, that this logic is not working in every case. Gentoo
offers dpkg-* utils also. The result is that pd-extended gets
installed into places, which are only for ebuilds.
(Takes me some time to figure out, whether everything wants
to go to /usr...)
As long as there are no official ebuilds for Gentoo, pd-extended
should keep its fingers off /usr.
If the distribution cannot figured out 100% surely, break the
 installation
process or ask the user for help.
The existence or not-existence of certain tools is not strong logic.
  
Only my two cents, your currency may vary... ;)
  
---
  
I compiled pd-0.42-5 from the link you gave me, and it
compiles/installes well.
Unfortunately I have no clue, how install the rest, which makes the
now installed pd-vanilla into pd-extended...
  
  
  http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/trunk/
  Here you can download several external libraries. Some may install easy,
  some may not. That's why the community came up with the 'template' (also
 in
  the externals-folder) to create a standard for libraries. Maybe in
 somewhere
  future all libraries will install the same way.
  It's a hell of a job to install all libraries pd-extended contains, but I
  guess there's no need for that. Pd-extended loads a bunch of externals
 every
  time you'll probably never use. It's easy though to have them all
 installed
  but personally I seemed to use almost only vanilla-objects. Since I use
 the
  same version you just installed I even know better what's available for
 pd.
  The only disadvantage of not having pd-extended I can think of is when
 you
  download someone else's patch and the only information you get is that
 all
  objects are included in pd-extended.
 
  So whether you can use it the way as described above or you can try to
  change the install-path of pd-extended and uninstall pd-vanilla again.
  For the last option: searching somewhere in the source for /usr/bin/
 and
  change that bit of text to usr/local/bin is what I would try in your
  position.
  mfg
  Funs

 No!  Stop...I will NOT search through the source to get something
 instaled which is calledstable or release code to get a hint how
 install the whole stuff.  I am no developper (in this case). I am a
 user.  The trouble starts, where a faulty packaege is detected late in
 the __installation phase__ of the makefile system, urging the user to
 gues the way back to the failure inducing problem.
 Soryy guys...I quit.


Nothing to be sorry for. It's up to you what software you use.
mfg
Funs


 Bye,
 Best regards,
 mcc




___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] Fwd: Disabling of packages to build...

2010-08-01 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner

The existing build system is definitly ugly but it does work on many systems as 
long as you have all the deps installed.  If you want to work with libs 
direcly, then use those build systems directly.

If you want to improve gentoo support, the best way right now would be to 
package the template library, then it'll be really easy to package/build all 
the libs that are based on that template.  Its a clean, well-tested standalone 
approach, and that's where pd-extended is headed.

Search puredata.info for makefile template.

.Hc

- Original message -
 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] Fwd: Disabling of packages to build...

2010-07-31 Thread Funs Seelen
-- Forwarded message --
From: Funs Seelen funssee...@gmail.com
Date: 2010/7/31
Subject: Re: [PD] Disabling of packages to build...
To: meino.cra...@gmx.de




  2010/7/31 meino.cra...@gmx.de

 Hello Funs,

 Funs Seelen funssee...@gmail.com [10-07-31 22:28]:
  Hello Meino,
 
  2010/7/31 meino.cra...@gmx.de
 
   Hi,
  
while fighting for a successful compilation of Pd-0.41.4-extended
the build process falls over a certain package which I have now
decided to exclude.
  
Where can I disable the build and install of packages from
Pd-extended?
  
   What do you mean with packages? Building pd depends on some packages
 (as
  I recently learned for example tk8.*-dev). You can't exclude them, but
 you
  just need to install them:
 
  $ sudo apt-get install the_package_i_need
 
  If you mean libraries or objects editing Makefile might be helpful.
 
  $ nano Makefile
 
  But then I would rather build pd-0.42-5 and install the external
 libraries
  you need or listen to Hans and build his latest release candidate (I
 don't
  know where he hid the source code). 0.42-5 makes editing a little easier.

  I checked out pd-extended-0.42 (release code) and tried several
  times to compile/installed it but it failed due to errors, which
  are not based on missing dependencies. And finally I gave up.

  Now I tried the stable pd-extended release and again fall over
  packages not compiling.

  I am frustrated about that.

 I can understand.


  I think I gave it up finally.

 If you think you gave up and you're not sure 100% about that here are
some possible solutions:

- Quit working on it for now and wait at least until tomorrow;

- Tell us what system you are running (maybe others have had the same
problem before or have an already-built-package for your platform) 
- write down the output of the errors;

- Download pd-0.42-5 http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/software.html, install
tk8.5-dev (if using linux) and build it (see README.txt) 
- install the libraries you need afterwards.


  Thanks for all help I got here.

  bye

  Best regards,
  mcc

 
 
Thank you very much for any help in advance!
Best regards,
mcc
  
   I hope this somehow is an answer to your question. If not I'm sorry for
 not
  understanding your question right.
 
 
  
  
   ___
   Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
   UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
   http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
  

  ___
  Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
  UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list