Re: [PD] GSoC Organization App 2008 wiki page

2008-03-18 Thread Georg Holzmann
Hans-Christoph Steiner schrieb:
 I think they want to see more polish on the app.  I had a brief  
 conversation with the administrator of GSoC, Leslie Hawthorn:

Hm, I don't know ...
We had really many ideas on the page and described in many details (at 
least the most of them) - much more than last year.
Also the other organizations I was looking through did have much less 
ideas without a detailed description ...

However, of course it can be better for the next time ;)

LG
Georg

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] GSoC Organization App 2008 wiki page

2008-03-18 Thread Jamie Bullock

On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 15:08 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
 On Mar 18, 2008, at 4:30 AM, Georg Holzmann wrote:
 
  Hans-Christoph Steiner schrieb:
  I think they want to see more polish on the app.  I had a brief   
  conversation with the administrator of GSoC, Leslie Hawthorn:
 
  Hm, I don't know ...
  We had really many ideas on the page and described in many details  
  (at least the most of them) - much more than last year.
  Also the other organizations I was looking through did have much  
  less ideas without a detailed description ...
 
  However, of course it can be better for the next time ;)
 
 
 I think they wanted to see the whole page look polished.  We had a  
 lot of ideas, some polished, and some just jotted down.

Well at least the list is there now. Pity about the application, I was
looking forward to it :-(

Anyhow - had I known about the ideas needing more fleshing out I would
have been happy to do so. Here's to next year's app with more flesh on
the bones!

BTW, I also wonder if we would have a better chance if we had some kind
of already established 'Foundation' - I see this word popping up a lot
on the participating organisations page. I know Pd enjoys its
de-centralised status, but having some kind of semi-formal 'Foundation'
seems to help with things like funding applications. What do you think?


Jamie

-- 
www.postlude.co.uk


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] GSoC Organization App 2008 wiki page

2008-03-18 Thread marius schebella
Jamie Bullock wrote:
 BTW, I also wonder if we would have a better chance if we had some kind
 of already established 'Foundation' - I see this word popping up a lot
 on the participating organisations page. I know Pd enjoys its
 de-centralised status, but having some kind of semi-formal 'Foundation'
 seems to help with things like funding applications. What do you think?

hey jamie,
I think it would have been easier, but I am not sure if it would have 
been better. I tried to push something like that in the past, but any 
group you want to found would never represent all interests. I think 
there are different interest groups in the pd community, but as you 
said, some centralized government... don't think so.
Today I would say, let's go for a foundation, but the foundation would 
not be the pd foundation, just a foundation.
I think foundations help to channel and bundle efforts like summer of 
code, coding in general, bugfixing, documentation, tutorials, website, 
forums, meetings, grants, donations, art events, pd conventions... it 
could support a special distribution like pd-extended or a special 
branch like desiredata or even a special pd-application like netpd.
I also think that people who want to donate money should have the 
possibility to do so. right now there is none.
marius.

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] GSoC Organization App 2008 wiki page

2008-03-17 Thread marius schebella
that's really bad to hear, especially since iem was already getting 
money last year. do you think there was a problem with last years projects?

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

 A word to everyone for future reference, personal connections are key  
 in getting grants.  

or maybe supporting pd is useless for google. don't you think they 
sponsor projects that google can benefit from? maybe next year...

marius.

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] GSoC Organization App 2008 wiki page

2008-03-17 Thread Georg Holzmann
Hallo!

marius schebella schrieb:
 that's really bad to hear, especially since iem was already getting 
 money last year. do you think there was a problem with last years projects?

Maybe there were too few student-applications last year ...

 or maybe supporting pd is useless for google. don't you think they 
 sponsor projects that google can benefit from? maybe next year...

Hm, I don't think so - CLAM and similar other projects are also in.

LG
Georg

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] GSoC Organization App 2008 wiki page

2008-03-17 Thread Andy Farnell

Maybe it's a pecking order thing. After applying two consecutive years
we should be in with a much better chance next year (assuming there's 
some fairness in the review process and history is taken into
account)



On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:53:39 +0100
Georg Holzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hallo!
 
 marius schebella schrieb:
  that's really bad to hear, especially since iem was already getting 
  money last year. do you think there was a problem with last years projects?
 
 Maybe there were too few student-applications last year ...
 
  or maybe supporting pd is useless for google. don't you think they 
  sponsor projects that google can benefit from? maybe next year...
 
 Hm, I don't think so - CLAM and similar other projects are also in.
 
 LG
 Georg
 
 ___
 PD-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


-- 
Use the source

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] GSoC Organization App 2008 wiki page

2008-03-17 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner

I think they want to see more polish on the app.  I had a brief  
conversation with the administrator of GSoC, Leslie Hawthorn:

http://puredata.info/dev/summer-of-code/GoogleSummerOfCodeIdeas/

lh: _hc: you made our short list and i have heard good things about  
you. your ideas could have been fleshed out a lot more though
lh: _hc: many ideas did not have any supporting write ups at al.
lh: all even
_hc: lh: yeah, it we should have put more work into it, but you think  
the project fits in well with GSoC?
lh: _hc: absolutely, we just need more meat from you next time.
_hc: lh: yeah, we are pretty chaotic, it was an open wiki, so people  
just added from the list discussions
_hc: lh: is it best then to only have polished ideas on that page?
lh: _hc: yes, or indicate that some are not well polished

Now that this whole thing is up on puredata.info, it will be much  
easier to improve upon the application, rather than starting from  
scratch again.

.hc

On Mar 17, 2008, at 7:30 PM, Andy Farnell wrote:


 Maybe it's a pecking order thing. After applying two consecutive years
 we should be in with a much better chance next year (assuming there's
 some fairness in the review process and history is taken into
 account)



 On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:53:39 +0100
 Georg Holzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hallo!

 marius schebella schrieb:
 that's really bad to hear, especially since iem was already getting
 money last year. do you think there was a problem with last years  
 projects?

 Maybe there were too few student-applications last year ...

 or maybe supporting pd is useless for google. don't you think they
 sponsor projects that google can benefit from? maybe next year...

 Hm, I don't think so - CLAM and similar other projects are also in.

 LG
 Georg

 ___
 PD-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/ 
 listinfo/pd-list


 -- 
 Use the source

 ___
 PD-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/ 
 listinfo/pd-list




 


All mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies,  
one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better  
language; and every chapter must be so translated -John Donne



___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] GSoC Organization App 2008 wiki page

2008-03-17 Thread Martin Eckart
That's sad to hear.  A little frustrating since they really only gave a
2.5 week warning for this. I guess I could try to do libPD, get it going
on openmoko for:

Ambient Noise Detection 
Wishlist:Software:Ambient_Noise_Detection could be implemented
as a
D-Bus-utilizing daemon that controls/signals the other daemons
according
to environmental sound levels.


Maybe? :p

-martin

On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 20:12 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
 I think they want to see more polish on the app.  I had a brief  
 conversation with the administrator of GSoC, Leslie Hawthorn:
 
 http://puredata.info/dev/summer-of-code/GoogleSummerOfCodeIdeas/
 
 lh: _hc: you made our short list and i have heard good things about  
 you. your ideas could have been fleshed out a lot more though
 lh: _hc: many ideas did not have any supporting write ups at al.
 lh: all even
 _hc: lh: yeah, it we should have put more work into it, but you think  
 the project fits in well with GSoC?
 lh: _hc: absolutely, we just need more meat from you next time.
 _hc: lh: yeah, we are pretty chaotic, it was an open wiki, so people  
 just added from the list discussions
 _hc: lh: is it best then to only have polished ideas on that page?
 lh: _hc: yes, or indicate that some are not well polished
 
 Now that this whole thing is up on puredata.info, it will be much  
 easier to improve upon the application, rather than starting from  
 scratch again.
 
 .hc
 
 On Mar 17, 2008, at 7:30 PM, Andy Farnell wrote:
 
 
  Maybe it's a pecking order thing. After applying two consecutive years
  we should be in with a much better chance next year (assuming there's
  some fairness in the review process and history is taken into
  account)
 
 
 
  On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 23:53:39 +0100
  Georg Holzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hallo!
 
  marius schebella schrieb:
  that's really bad to hear, especially since iem was already getting
  money last year. do you think there was a problem with last years  
  projects?
 
  Maybe there were too few student-applications last year ...
 
  or maybe supporting pd is useless for google. don't you think they
  sponsor projects that google can benefit from? maybe next year...
 
  Hm, I don't think so - CLAM and similar other projects are also in.
 
  LG
  Georg
 
  ___
  PD-list@iem.at mailing list
  UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/ 
  listinfo/pd-list
 
 
  -- 
  Use the source
 
  ___
  PD-list@iem.at mailing list
  UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/ 
  listinfo/pd-list
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 All mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies,  
 one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better  
 language; and every chapter must be so translated -John Donne
 
 
 
 ___
 PD-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] GSoC Organization App 2008 wiki page

2008-03-12 Thread Martin Eckart
How'd the application submission go?  Did you get as many mentors as
you'd hoped?

Unfortunately the March 24th-30th  window is exactly when most of my end
of term projects are due so I'd like to get working on my student
application this weekend with hopes that the mentoring application
process goes through smoothly ;)

Currently I'm considering applying for LibPD (depending on
scope/difficulty, I'd love to help get PluggoPD working) or possibly
Speech Recognition as a secondary interest.

Since I'm a noob to actual PD development (I have some experience
creating and compiling externals, but that's the extent) so I've got
some trouble with scoping the issues.  At the moment, the LibPD project
just seems to me like a fiddle with makefiles project but I'm pretty
sure there's a lot more to it than that so I'd like to pick someone's
(Chris?) brain about it a bit in order to make a good and clear
application.


Also, is this list the forum I should be discussing this in?  Is
PD-devel more appropriate?  IRC?

I was also about to ask whether you really expected proposals close to
the 7500 word limit I read about in the GSoC FAQ, but I just re-read it
and figured out it's 7500 _characters_.  ~1000 words seems a lot more
reasonable ;)

Cheers,

-martin


On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 10:46 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
 Hey all,
 
 I decided to stick up a wiki page for this GSoC organization  
 application.  Then everyone can see it, contribute to it, and find it  
 next year when we want to raid it for text for the next application :)
 
 http://puredata.info/dev/summer-of-code/GSoCOrganizationApp2008
 
 Feel free to add anything to it, whether it be paragraphs or bullet  
 points.  Then I put the whole thing together to submit tomorrow.
 
 .hc
 
  
 
 
 News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is  
 publicity.  - Bill Moyers
 
 
 
 ___
 PD-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] GSoC Organization App 2008 wiki page

2008-03-11 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner

Hey all,

I decided to stick up a wiki page for this GSoC organization  
application.  Then everyone can see it, contribute to it, and find it  
next year when we want to raid it for text for the next application :)

http://puredata.info/dev/summer-of-code/GSoCOrganizationApp2008

Feel free to add anything to it, whether it be paragraphs or bullet  
points.  Then I put the whole thing together to submit tomorrow.

.hc

 


News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is  
publicity.  - Bill Moyers



___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list