Re: [PD] data structures - get symbol?
This should work since 0.39, but as always with data structures: This is an area that's changing a lot with every new Miller-Pd so I'd recommend to use 0.40 instead. With that, you can [set] and [get] symbol fields as shown in attached patch. Setting them on creation with [append] doesn't seem to work yet, however, at least I couldn't make it work. thanks, it works fine on the latest version of pd-ext. I guess (I hope) that the next step would be implementing the symbols in [append], so that an extra [set -symbol] must not be used. Is Mr. Miller on the house? :) one more question though: I tried to apply the [get] help patch in my patch, but it didn't work. in the following picture, when I press traverse pd breaks up. on the other hand, like in your patch connecting directly [append] to the get pointer (through the inlet which is now disconnected) it works when the structures are created, but I can't make it work after that.attachment: get.jpg ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] data structures - get symbol?
Hallo, João Miguel Pais hat gesagt: // João Miguel Pais wrote: one more question though: I tried to apply the [get] help patch in my patch, but it didn't work. in the following picture, when I press traverse pd breaks up. on the other hand, like in your patch connecting directly [append] to the get pointer (through the inlet which is now disconnected) it works when the structures are created, but I can't make it work after that. [traverse pd-SUBPATCH, bang( | [pointer] will output a pointer to the start of [pd SUBPATCH], but not a pointer to an actual scalar. You need to use [next( for that or directly: [traverse pd-SUBPATCH, next( | [pointer] Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ __footils.org_ __goto10.org__ ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] data structures - get symbol?
[traverse pd-SUBPATCH, next( | [pointer] hmm, komisch. I had also tried out with next (I thought I had sent the picture with it). the result is the same, pd quits when the [next( after the traverse comes. there's also another structure type on the same subpatch, but I guess that that shouldn't interfere, right? Joao ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
