Re: [PD] mtx_div
marius schebella wrote: > Hi, > just a short question about iemmatrix: is there a mtx_div? at least in well, there is a [mtx_./] since there is no division defined for matrices, there is no [mtx_/]. > pd-ext I cannot find it. and what is the difference between mtx_* and > mtx_.*? or does mtx_* just not work with two matrices? > marius. the help-file might be a good starting point to get the differences between all these objects. in general, mtx-operations with a dot in the name (e.g. [mtx_.^]) work on the elements of the matrix whereas operations without a dot work on entire matrices. (this follows the matlab/octave conventions) fmga.sdr IOhannes ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] mtx_div
Hallo Marius! > just a short question about iemmatrix: is there a mtx_div? at least in hm ... I don't think so - just use mul ! > pd-ext I cannot find it. and what is the difference between mtx_* and > mtx_.*? or does mtx_* just not work with two matrices? This is like in octave/matlab: .* means element wise multiplication, * means matrix multiplication. e.g.: [ a ] * [ b ] = a*b + c*d [ c ] [ d ] [ a ] .* [ b ] = [ a*b ] [ c ][ d ][ c*d ] LG Georg ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] mtx_div
Hi, just a short question about iemmatrix: is there a mtx_div? at least in pd-ext I cannot find it. and what is the difference between mtx_* and mtx_.*? or does mtx_* just not work with two matrices? marius. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
