Re: [PD] pix_film frame control offset 8 MacOsX

2011-03-23 Thread chris clepper
That's not completely surprising since Apple is destroying the old, useful
Quicktime and not replacing it with anything comparable.  But, hey, your
computer now acts more like your cellphone!

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Matthias Neuenhofer matth...@neuenhofer.de
 wrote:

 hm - beware for update 10.6.5

 released nov 2010 - fits to my experience - i had no problems last summer
 with synchronization
 of video + sound.

 i tested also on MacPro and different MacBook Pro with 10.6.6 same issue.
 even update to 10.6.7 didn´t solve the problem.

 m
 Am 22.03.2011 um 13:37 schrieb chris clepper:

 I tested this on 10.6.4 and the latest Pd-Extended and did not see this
 problem.

 On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Matthias Neuenhofer 
 matth...@neuenhofer.de wrote:

 Dear list,

 i recognized that pix_film have an offset of 8 when trigger with frame
 number on 2. inlet.
 When video is loaded the 1. frame is visible and stay sending 1 - 8.
 Number 9 render the
 2. frame, 10 the 3. frame … but i can´t get back the 1. frame this is only
 shown up with loading.
 It´s also not possible to get the last 7 frames.
 The length of the video in the console is printed correct when opened.

 Can somebody confirm this. I´m working on MAc OsX 10.6.6 and tried
 pd-extended 0.43,
 0.41rc4 and latest 0.42. all the same behavior. Can´t remember on which
 version of MacOs
 it worked correct last.

 For easy testing here a 100 frame mov counting 0-99
 http://matthias.neuenhofer.de/_testMOV/_testF75mov.zip

 lg
 Matthias
 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] pix_film frame control offset 8 MacOsX

2011-03-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 2011-03-20 20:34, tim vets wrote:
 hi,
 f.y.i., I wanted to check this, but opening that video with [pix_film]
 crashes pd instantly here, saying:
 

please report a bug for maverick's libquicktime library.

fgmasdr
IOhannes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk2IWjAACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvRJ3gCgzpNFFubkGcYfWTfSHrV0aj62
tE8An3iKVP45+/4WtYUbxxEITsKAEYa4
=zYbz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] pix_film frame control offset 8 MacOsX

2011-03-22 Thread chris clepper
I tested this on 10.6.4 and the latest Pd-Extended and did not see this
problem.

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Matthias Neuenhofer matth...@neuenhofer.de
 wrote:

 Dear list,

 i recognized that pix_film have an offset of 8 when trigger with frame
 number on 2. inlet.
 When video is loaded the 1. frame is visible and stay sending 1 - 8. Number
 9 render the
 2. frame, 10 the 3. frame … but i can´t get back the 1. frame this is only
 shown up with loading.
 It´s also not possible to get the last 7 frames.
 The length of the video in the console is printed correct when opened.

 Can somebody confirm this. I´m working on MAc OsX 10.6.6 and tried
 pd-extended 0.43,
 0.41rc4 and latest 0.42. all the same behavior. Can´t remember on which
 version of MacOs
 it worked correct last.

 For easy testing here a 100 frame mov counting 0-99
 http://matthias.neuenhofer.de/_testMOV/_testF75mov.zip

 lg
 Matthias
 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] pix_film frame control offset 8 MacOsX

2011-03-22 Thread Matthias Neuenhofer
hm - beware for update 10.6.5

released nov 2010 - fits to my experience - i had no problems last summer with 
synchronization
of video + sound.

i tested also on MacPro and different MacBook Pro with 10.6.6 same issue.
even update to 10.6.7 didn´t solve the problem.

m
Am 22.03.2011 um 13:37 schrieb chris clepper:

 I tested this on 10.6.4 and the latest Pd-Extended and did not see this 
 problem.
 
 On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Matthias Neuenhofer matth...@neuenhofer.de 
 wrote:
 Dear list,
 
 i recognized that pix_film have an offset of 8 when trigger with frame number 
 on 2. inlet.
 When video is loaded the 1. frame is visible and stay sending 1 - 8. Number 9 
 render the
 2. frame, 10 the 3. frame … but i can´t get back the 1. frame this is only 
 shown up with loading.
 It´s also not possible to get the last 7 frames.
 The length of the video in the console is printed correct when opened.
 
 Can somebody confirm this. I´m working on MAc OsX 10.6.6 and tried 
 pd-extended 0.43,
 0.41rc4 and latest 0.42. all the same behavior. Can´t remember on which 
 version of MacOs
 it worked correct last.
 
 For easy testing here a 100 frame mov counting 0-99
 http://matthias.neuenhofer.de/_testMOV/_testF75mov.zip
 
 lg
 Matthias
 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
 

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] pix_film frame control offset 8 MacOsX

2011-03-20 Thread Matthias Neuenhofer
Dear list,

i recognized that pix_film have an offset of 8 when trigger with frame number 
on 2. inlet.
When video is loaded the 1. frame is visible and stay sending 1 - 8. Number 9 
render the 
2. frame, 10 the 3. frame … but i can´t get back the 1. frame this is only 
shown up with loading.
It´s also not possible to get the last 7 frames.
The length of the video in the console is printed correct when opened.

Can somebody confirm this. I´m working on MAc OsX 10.6.6 and tried pd-extended 
0.43,
0.41rc4 and latest 0.42. all the same behavior. Can´t remember on which version 
of MacOs
it worked correct last.

For easy testing here a 100 frame mov counting 0-99
http://matthias.neuenhofer.de/_testMOV/_testF75mov.zip

lg
Matthias
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] pix_film frame control offset 8 MacOsX

2011-03-20 Thread tim vets
hi,
f.y.i., I wanted to check this, but opening that video with [pix_film]
crashes pd instantly here, saying:

tk scaling is 1.12537210107
swScaler: Exactly one scaler algorithm must be chosen
socket receive error: Connection reset by peer (104)
Segmentation fault

ubuntu Maverick, Pd-extended 0.42.5, Gem ver: 0.92.3
it plays fine with mplayer.
gr,
Tim

2011/3/20 Matthias Neuenhofer matth...@neuenhofer.de

 Dear list,

 i recognized that pix_film have an offset of 8 when trigger with frame
 number on 2. inlet.
 When video is loaded the 1. frame is visible and stay sending 1 - 8. Number
 9 render the
 2. frame, 10 the 3. frame … but i can´t get back the 1. frame this is only
 shown up with loading.
 It´s also not possible to get the last 7 frames.
 The length of the video in the console is printed correct when opened.

 Can somebody confirm this. I´m working on MAc OsX 10.6.6 and tried
 pd-extended 0.43,
 0.41rc4 and latest 0.42. all the same behavior. Can´t remember on which
 version of MacOs
 it worked correct last.

 For easy testing here a 100 frame mov counting 0-99
 http://matthias.neuenhofer.de/_testMOV/_testF75mov.zip

 lg
 Matthias
 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] pix_film frame control offset 8 MacOsX

2011-03-20 Thread Matthias Neuenhofer
hi tim
video is 720x576 Foto JPEG with 75% compression
aspect ratio is 1.25 - normal for dv or mpg2

can you try this 768x576 same compression - aspect ratio 1.33
http://matthias.neuenhofer.de/_testMOV/_testF75qmov.zip

lg
Matthias
Am 20.03.2011 um 20:34 schrieb tim vets:

 hi,
 f.y.i., I wanted to check this, but opening that video with [pix_film] 
 crashes pd instantly here, saying:
 
 tk scaling is 1.12537210107
 swScaler: Exactly one scaler algorithm must be chosen
 socket receive error: Connection reset by peer (104)
 Segmentation fault
 
 ubuntu Maverick, Pd-extended 0.42.5, Gem ver: 0.92.3
 it plays fine with mplayer.
 gr,
 Tim
 
 2011/3/20 Matthias Neuenhofer matth...@neuenhofer.de
 Dear list,
 
 i recognized that pix_film have an offset of 8 when trigger with frame number 
 on 2. inlet.
 When video is loaded the 1. frame is visible and stay sending 1 - 8. Number 9 
 render the
 2. frame, 10 the 3. frame … but i can´t get back the 1. frame this is only 
 shown up with loading.
 It´s also not possible to get the last 7 frames.
 The length of the video in the console is printed correct when opened.
 
 Can somebody confirm this. I´m working on MAc OsX 10.6.6 and tried 
 pd-extended 0.43,
 0.41rc4 and latest 0.42. all the same behavior. Can´t remember on which 
 version of MacOs
 it worked correct last.
 
 For easy testing here a 100 frame mov counting 0-99
 http://matthias.neuenhofer.de/_testMOV/_testF75mov.zip
 
 lg
 Matthias
 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
 

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list