Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?
In vanilla at least, -stdpath and -nostdpath simpl turn on and off searching in the "extra" directory of Pd. It takes no argument. cheers Miller On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 07:26:05PM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > hi > > i just figured out, that i don't know how to use [declare -stdpath]. the > help-file mentions 'relative to Pd', though i cannot figure out, what > this exactly means. this is on pd-vanilla 0.40.2. > > my pd: > /usr/local/bin/pd > > and i wanted to load 'iemabs': > /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/iemabs/ > > therefore i tried: > [declare -stdpath iemabs] (assuming 'extra' is the standard location) > [declare -stdpath ../lib/pd/extra/iemabs] (relative to the pd binary) > [declare -stdpath extra/iemabs] > > all failed. what am i doing wrong? > > roman > > > > > > > > ___ > Der fr?he Vogel f?ngt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: > http://mail.yahoo.de > > > ___ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?
i was talking about [declare -stdpath], not about the command-flag '-stdpath'. the helpfile of [declare] says: -stdpathadd search path, relative to the Pd can you explain, where 'Pd' is meant to be? or is the helpfile wrong and [declare -stdpath] does the same as the command-flag '-stdpath'? ciao roman On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 12:26 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: > In vanilla at least, -stdpath and -nostdpath simpl turn on and off searching > in the "extra" directory of Pd. It takes no argument. > > cheers > Miller > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 07:26:05PM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > hi > > > > i just figured out, that i don't know how to use [declare -stdpath]. the > > help-file mentions 'relative to Pd', though i cannot figure out, what > > this exactly means. this is on pd-vanilla 0.40.2. > > > > my pd: > > /usr/local/bin/pd > > > > and i wanted to load 'iemabs': > > /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/iemabs/ > > > > therefore i tried: > > [declare -stdpath iemabs] (assuming 'extra' is the standard location) > > [declare -stdpath ../lib/pd/extra/iemabs] (relative to the pd binary) > > [declare -stdpath extra/iemabs] > > > > all failed. what am i doing wrong? > > > > roman > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > Der fr?he Vogel f?ngt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: > > http://mail.yahoo.de > > > > > > > ___ > > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > ___ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Miller Puckette wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 07:26:05PM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
i just figured out, that i don't know how to use [declare -stdpath]. the
In vanilla at least, -stdpath and -nostdpath simpl turn on and off searching
in the "extra" directory of Pd. It takes no argument.
Roman is not even talking about that feature. He's talking about the other
feature of the same name. It's in a class named [declare]. You added
[declare] in 0.40. It is implemented by canvas_declare, a function that
you wrote for 0.40. That feature takes an argument, as you wrote in the
code:
else if ((argc > i+1) && !strcmp(flag, "-stdpath"))
{
strncpy(strbuf, sys_libdir->s_name, MAXPDSTRING-3);
strbuf[MAXPDSTRING-4] = 0;
strcat(strbuf, "/");
strncpy(strbuf, atom_getsymbolarg(i+1, argc, argv)->s_name,
MAXPDSTRING-strlen(strbuf));
strbuf[MAXPDSTRING-1] = 0;
e->ce_path = namelist_append(e->ce_path, strbuf, 0);
i++;
}
Because atom_getsymbolarg takes an argument, and i++ augments the counter
so that it points to the beginning of the next option, which is after that
argument. This is what you wrote.
_ _ __ ___ _ _ _ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?
Oops, my mistake.
In "declare" systax, "-stdpath" does take an argument... if you give it
foo/bar, for example, the directory searched is .../pd/foo/bar.
My bad for naming it the same as the command-line argument, which does
something different.
cheers
Miller
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 04:38:31PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Miller Puckette wrote:
> >On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 07:26:05PM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> >>i just figured out, that i don't know how to use [declare -stdpath]. the
> >In vanilla at least, -stdpath and -nostdpath simpl turn on and off
> >searching
> >in the "extra" directory of Pd. It takes no argument.
>
> Roman is not even talking about that feature. He's talking about the other
> feature of the same name. It's in a class named [declare]. You added
> [declare] in 0.40. It is implemented by canvas_declare, a function that
> you wrote for 0.40. That feature takes an argument, as you wrote in the
> code:
>
> else if ((argc > i+1) && !strcmp(flag, "-stdpath"))
> {
> strncpy(strbuf, sys_libdir->s_name, MAXPDSTRING-3);
> strbuf[MAXPDSTRING-4] = 0;
> strcat(strbuf, "/");
> strncpy(strbuf, atom_getsymbolarg(i+1, argc, argv)->s_name,
> MAXPDSTRING-strlen(strbuf));
> strbuf[MAXPDSTRING-1] = 0;
> e->ce_path = namelist_append(e->ce_path, strbuf, 0);
> i++;
> }
>
> Because atom_getsymbolarg takes an argument, and i++ augments the counter
> so that it points to the beginning of the next option, which is after that
> argument. This is what you wrote.
>
> _ _ __ ___ _ _ _ ...
> | Mathieu Bouchard - t?l:+1.514.383.3801, Montr?al QC Canada
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?
hi again from the help-file i got an idea, how about it is supposed to work, but i can't get it work. can you make me a working example? did you test this feature? here a real-world example (from my first post in this thread): location of pd: /usr/local/bin/pd and i wanted to load [bp2~] from 'iemabs': /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/iemabs/ therefore i tried: [declare -stdpath iemabs] (assuming 'extra' is the standard location) [declare -stdpath ../lib/pd/extra/iemabs] (relative to the pd binary) [declare -stdpath extra/iemabs] for each example, i first saved the patch with the [declared] and reloaded it and tried to instantiate [bp2~], but it always failed. i can't imagine, what argument i am supposed to give to [declare -stdpath]. here is what i get from verbose output: - [declare -stdpath extra/iemabs] tried /home/roman/netpd/extra/iemabs/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/extra/iemabs/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/extra/iemabs/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/extra/iemabs/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/extra/iemabs/bp2~.pd and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.pd and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.pd and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.pd and failed tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.pd and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/extra/iemabs/bp2~.pat and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.pat and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.pat and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.pat and failed tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.pat and failed bp2~ ... couldn't create - [declare -stdpath iemabs] tried /home/roman/netpd/iemabs/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/5.reference/help-iemmatrix/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/iemabs/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/5.reference/help-iemmatrix/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/iemabs/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/5.reference/help-iemmatrix/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/iemabs/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/5.reference/help-iemmatrix/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/iemabs/bp2~.pd and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/5.reference/help-iemmatrix/bp2~.pd and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.pd and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.pd and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.pd and failed tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.pd and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/iemabs/bp2~.pat and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/5.reference/help-iemmatrix/bp2~.pat and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.pat and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.pat and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.pat and failed tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.pat and failed bp2~ ... couldn't create - [declare -stdpath ../lib/pd/extra/iemabs] tried /home/roman/netpd/../lib/pd/extra/iemabs/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/5.reference/help-iemmatrix/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.l_i386 and failed tried /home/roman/netpd/../lib/pd/extra/iemab
Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?
Aha.. it's buggy. You have to say "declare -stdpath ../extra/iemabs" (because, by mistake, it's relative to the pd/src directory!). I think I should fix this (hoping nobody else gets bitten in the opposite direction)... cheers Miller On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 12:59:22AM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > hi again > > from the help-file i got an idea, how about it is supposed to work, but > i can't get it work. can you make me a working example? did you test > this feature? > > here a real-world example (from my first post in this thread): > > location of pd: > /usr/local/bin/pd > > and i wanted to load [bp2~] from 'iemabs': > /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/iemabs/ > > therefore i tried: > [declare -stdpath iemabs] (assuming 'extra' is the standard location) > [declare -stdpath ../lib/pd/extra/iemabs] (relative to the pd binary) > [declare -stdpath extra/iemabs] > > > for each example, i first saved the patch with the [declared] and > reloaded it and tried to instantiate [bp2~], but it always failed. i > can't imagine, what argument i am supposed to give to [declare > -stdpath]. > > here is what i get from verbose output: > > - [declare -stdpath extra/iemabs] > > tried /home/roman/netpd/extra/iemabs/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/extra/iemabs/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/extra/iemabs/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/extra/iemabs/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/extra/iemabs/bp2~.pd and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.pd and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.pd and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.pd and failed > tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.pd and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/extra/iemabs/bp2~.pat and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.pat and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.pat and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.pat and failed > tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.pat and failed > bp2~ > ... couldn't create > > > - [declare -stdpath iemabs] > > tried /home/roman/netpd/iemabs/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/5.reference/help-iemmatrix/bp2~.l_i386 and > failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/iemabs/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/5.reference/help-iemmatrix/bp2~.pd_linux and > failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/iemabs/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/5.reference/help-iemmatrix/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 > and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~/bp2~.l_i386 and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/iemabs/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/5.reference/help-iemmatrix/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and > failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~/bp2~.pd_linux and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/iemabs/bp2~.pd and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/5.reference/help-iemmatrix/bp2~.pd and > failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.pd and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.pd and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.pd and failed > tried /usr/local/lib/pd/extra/bp2~.pd and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/iemabs/bp2~.pat and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/5.reference/help-iemmatrix/bp2~.pat and > failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/abs/bp2~.pat and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/doc/bp2~.pat and failed > tried /home/roman/netpd/bp2~.pat and failed > trie
Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 16:18 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: > Aha.. it's buggy. You have to say "declare -stdpath ../extra/iemabs" > (because, by mistake, it's relative to the pd/src directory!). ah, cool. i am glad to hear, that it is sorted out. > I think I should fix this (hoping nobody else gets bitten in the opposite > direction)... i have the silent impression, that nobody else ever tried this feature before roman ___ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?
pdrp has it... On 8/11/07, Roman Haefeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 16:18 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: > > Aha.. it's buggy. You have to say "declare -stdpath ../extra/iemabs" > > (because, by mistake, it's relative to the pd/src directory!). > > ah, cool. i am glad to hear, that it is sorted out. > > > I think I should fix this (hoping nobody else gets bitten in the opposite > > direction)... > > i have the silent impression, that nobody else ever tried this feature > before > > roman > > > > > > > > > ___ > Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: > http://mail.yahoo.de > > > > ___ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > -- Jaime E Oliver LR [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.realidadvisual.org/jaimeoliver www-crca.ucsd.edu/ www.realidadvisual.org 8628 Via Mallorca Apt. F La Jolla, CA 92037 USA ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?
I think it's got "declare" all over the place, but no "declare -stdpath", which is the only source of trouble. cheers M On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:41:50PM -0700, Jaime Oliver wrote: > pdrp has it... > > On 8/11/07, Roman Haefeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 16:18 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: > > > Aha.. it's buggy. You have to say "declare -stdpath ../extra/iemabs" > > > (because, by mistake, it's relative to the pd/src directory!). > > > > ah, cool. i am glad to hear, that it is sorted out. > > > > > I think I should fix this (hoping nobody else gets bitten in the opposite > > > direction)... > > > > i have the silent impression, that nobody else ever tried this feature > > before > > > > roman > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > > Der fr?he Vogel f?ngt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: > > http://mail.yahoo.de > > > > > > > > ___ > > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > > > > -- > Jaime E Oliver LR > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.realidadvisual.org/jaimeoliver > www-crca.ucsd.edu/ > www.realidadvisual.org > > 8628 Via Mallorca Apt. F > La Jolla, CA 92037 > USA > > ___ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?
I think it would be a good idea to change the name while fixing the bug and kill two birds with one stone. (FYI: there are no changes to the declare stuff in Pd-extended AFAIK). .hc On Aug 12, 2007, at 2:56 AM, Miller Puckette wrote: > I think it's got "declare" all over the place, but no "declare - > stdpath", > which is the only source of trouble. > > cheers > M > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:41:50PM -0700, Jaime Oliver wrote: >> pdrp has it... >> >> On 8/11/07, Roman Haefeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 16:18 -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: Aha.. it's buggy. You have to say "declare -stdpath ../extra/ iemabs" (because, by mistake, it's relative to the pd/src directory!). >>> >>> ah, cool. i am glad to hear, that it is sorted out. >>> I think I should fix this (hoping nobody else gets bitten in the opposite direction)... >>> >>> i have the silent impression, that nobody else ever tried this >>> feature >>> before >>> >>> roman >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> Der fr?he Vogel f?ngt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen >>> Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> PD-list@iem.at mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ >>> listinfo/pd-list >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Jaime E Oliver LR >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> www.realidadvisual.org/jaimeoliver >> www-crca.ucsd.edu/ >> www.realidadvisual.org >> >> 8628 Via Mallorca Apt. F >> La Jolla, CA 92037 >> USA >> >> ___ >> PD-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ >> listinfo/pd-list > > ___ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds, and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits. - Martin Luther King, Jr. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 22:23 +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > (FYI: there are no changes to the declare stuff in Pd-extended AFAIK). am i right in thinking, that [declare] is included only in pd >=0.40 extended, but not in 0.39-extended? roman ___ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [declare -stdpath] relative to what?
On Aug 14, 2007, at 11:39 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 22:23 +0200, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> (FYI: there are no changes to the declare stuff in Pd-extended >> AFAIK). > > am i right in thinking, that [declare] is included only in pd >=0.40 > extended, but not in 0.39-extended? That is correct. An earlier version of [import] is included in 0.39.3-extended. .hc > > roman > > > > ___ > Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http:// > messenger.yahoo.de News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is publicity. - Bill Moyers ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
