Re: [PD] PdWeekend 2019/11/04 planning group [NB/Pd 2020 Vision Worldwide Fest News]
Hi Joey, It did come through, it's just you don't see your own response in gmail. Looks cool too:) Julian On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 21:05, Joey Dodson wrote: > Hi Joe! > > I'm not sure if I should reply here to the list or directly to you, so > feel free to respond directly if that's more appropriate. > > I'm super excited about Pd Weekend! I'd love to participate in some way > and I have a few ideas. Over the past several years, I've built a gestural > synthesizer using Raspberry Pis and programmed in Pure Data. It was > inspired by Onyx Ashanti's Beatjazz Controller, which I'm sure some of you > are familiar with. I would love to do a performance or a > demonstration/performance for one and I'd also like to do something a bit > more hands on as well, like a workshop. Let me know what you think and what > I should do from here! > > I tried to email this a few days ago, but I believe it didn't go through. > I'm assuming it's because I included Youtube and Instagram links, which the > list took to be spam. In any case, to see the work I'm doing and would be > presenting/performing, you can look me up as Psiforce or psiforcesounds. > Maybe someone can confirm that certain links aren't allowed in the list > also so I can avoid the situation in the future? > > Cheers, > Joey Dodson > a.k.a. Psiforce > > On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 2:14 PM Joe Deken > wrote: > >> There will be a PdWeekend October 4-6 in San Diego instigated by Miller >> and Friends (as ever). >> >> It's a happy circumstance that I don't need to explain to Pd-list what a >> *PdWeekend* as if >> as if I could. Rather you should simply ask someone who's participated in >> a PdW with us all. >> >> The usual suspects are percolating the kettle as an ad-hoc steering >> committee. (It's more like the merrygo round that Hans and friends >> devised at Madagascar Institute, actually ...) >> >> Our next PdWeekend events will take place in San Diego and Los Angeles >> October 4 - 6 (Fri-Sun) >> >> Starting of on Friday with a little >> welcome and "gear tech-handout" session Friday afternoon then >> ... >> >> . a RaspberryPi(4) *box lunch* ... which will actually be >> RPi-box-dinner-and-speakers-&-demos >> >> . round-workbenching on Saturday featuring the edgy-leading-edgers of Pd >> and NB/SuitSup >> >> . Saturday afternoon/evening and Sunday gala events >> at CrashSpace LA and its neighborhood arts-tech-conspiracies >> >> .Handmade music and beer, of course (and handmade beer, maybe) >> >> This is far to preliminary to be an *announcement* but let it be a >> provocation for you to float your ideas to the list or elsewhere. It's >> always great to meet a Pd-land neighbor again anywhere. >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> > ___ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] Re : Any alternative to [poly] allowing dynamic number of voices?
Hi, FYI: there's pull request here < https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/661 >. - Mail d'origine - De: Philip Stone À: pd-list@lists.iem.at Envoyé: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 06:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Objet: [PD] Any alternative to [poly] allowing dynamic number of voices? I’ve been using [poly] for a long time as the voice-allocation heart of a polyphonic synthesizer, and it does that job well. One drawback it has is that the number of voices can only be set at creation time. I’d love to be able to change that dynamically, e.g., with a number box, or otherwise. (I know this will be glitchy, and don’t care – I won’t be doing it during audio output). Are there any alternative [poly]-like objects that *do* allow dynamically changing the number of voices? I noticed in Miller’s ‘to-do’ comments in the source that he’d like to add an input to [poly] for changing the voice-stealing switch; I’d vote enthusiastically for a ‘number of voices’ input as well. Best, Phil Stone UC Davis ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] - need some assistance compiling an external for Windows
Am 10. Juli 2019 08:05:40 MESZ schrieb "Scott R. Looney" : > i'm on macOS and have installed GCC and mingw-64 via >Homebrew >so i should have what i need. > >after blundering around i was able to figure out how to build by just >typing 'make all' in the directory, but it just made a linux .o and a >.pd_darwin library. there must be a way to override the system >architecture >and force it to build a DLL. If you want to build binaries for Windows on your mac, you'd need a cross compiler. If you dont know what that is, you probably should geht hold on a Windows machine with msys2/mingw64 installed and build natively *there*. mdg.zdr.sfj IOhannes ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] - need some assistance compiling an external for Windows
hey folks, i asked this on the PD patchrepo but no response so far. i've recently run into a situation in which i have to recompile an external currently only available for mac (pd_darwin) to a Windows platform. the code was ported from the original C/C++ code of the Mutable Instrument module called Plaits. basically it's just a release of the DSP code as a PD object. it's hosted here: https://github.com/jnonis/pd-plaits he's including the xcode project but i believe the code itself is just straight .cpp files wrapped into the PD external template code. i think he's using the pdlibbuilder library that's been recently released, but i have had absolutely zero experience with compiling the source for different platforms. i'm on macOS and have installed GCC and mingw-64 via Homebrew so i should have what i need. after blundering around i was able to figure out how to build by just typing 'make all' in the directory, but it just made a linux .o and a .pd_darwin library. there must be a way to override the system architecture and force it to build a DLL. so far i've tried 'make all x86_64' and 'make all Windows' which give errors pretty quickly. if someone could help getting me over this hump it'd be appreciated! i'm assuming it should be a relatively easy compile, i just need to know what flags or overrides to put in. thanks in advance! best, scott ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
