Re: [PD] Rectangle object does not understand [width 7( message

[Dan Wilcox]

> On Sep 22, 2023, at 11:04 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote:
> 
> Cyrille,
> 
> thanks for your answer. I have not seen the sense to send a simple patch as
> it would not show the behaviour of the rendered Gem window under wsl2.

This isn't actually the point of sending a test patch... it's to help *other* 
people on *other systems* check that GEM itself is not broken *and* to 
double-check how you are using the objects & commands. Making a separate, 
minimal patch also isolates one problem form what could be other problems of 
usage, ie. layers of GL commands which might affect each other.

I agree with Cyril that a minimal patch would have been helpful. In any case, 
good luck.


Dan Wilcox
@danomatika 
danomatika.com 
robotcowboy.com 



___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Is the source server down?

[Roman Haefeli]

On Fri, 2023-09-22 at 08:38 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> 
> last night, miller's site finally got https:// support [...]

🥳


Roman



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Rectangle object does not understand [width 7( message

[Csaba Láng]

Cyrille,

thanks for your answer. I have not seen the sense to send a simple patch as
it would not show the behaviour of the rendered Gem window under wsl2.
Anyway, I have to use both Windows and subsystem Linux as on Windows does
not work the shell or command objects while under Linux the above mentioned
[width( command to the 2d shape objects such as triangle, rectangle or
circle.

Thanks for your support anyway.
Best,
Popesz

On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 5:10 PM cyrille henry  wrote:

> hello,
>
> ok, thanks for the screenshot. (i still think a patch is easier to share
> than a screenshot)
>
> Since nothing have been changed in this part of Gem this last 10 years, it
> is safe to assume that the difference between your 2 computers is not
> related to Gem.
> So, as Iohannes say, the problem is probably on the openGL implementation,
> certainly because of WSL.
> I never had this problem on a ubuntu computer with old intel GPU.
>
> I'm sorry , but I have no solution to offer exept not using WSL
> cheers
>
>
>
>
>
> Le 20/09/2023 à 11:42, Csaba Láng a écrit :
> > Cyrille,
> >
> > I am attaching the screenshot from my both system installed:
> > Screenshot 2023-09-20 113857.png
> >
> > The top line is the windows based Pd, the bottom line is from the wsl2
> Ubuntu. width 5 was applied on both rectangles. No error message printed in
> the console.
> > I hope it clears your doubts.
> > Let me know if you need anything else at this point.
> > Best,
> > Popesz
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 10:34 AM Csaba Láng  > wrote:
> >
> > You misunderstood me. I did use a simple patch and of course I used
> the width message correctly to the first inlet of the rectangle or circle
> objects with numbers from 1 to 7.
> > Under windows works correctly.
> >
> > On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 at 10:29, cyrille henry  c...@chnry.net>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Le 20/09/2023 à 09:39, Csaba Láng a écrit :
> >  > I have found this discussion on the web.
> >  >
> >  > https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/2855 <
> https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/2855> <
> https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/2855 <
> https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/2855>>
> >  > Does it take me closer to make it work?
> >  > I have a NUC i9 Beast Canyon computer with the integrated
> graphic card in it https://simplynuc.com/beast-canyon/ <
> https://simplynuc.com/beast-canyon/>  >
> >  >
> >  > Surely I have tried the simplest patch from the
> rectangle-help.pd. Tha was my first to try
> > the rectangle-help patch did not include a width message!
> > It may look silly, but I want to be 100% sure that you are using
> the width message correctly before blaming anything else.
> > Since you refuse to provide a simple patch that reproduce the
> problem on your computer, I can't confirm the problem and will not
> investigate further.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> >  >
> >  > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 9:13 AM Csaba Láng <
> langcs...@gmail.com   langcs...@gmail.com >> wrote:
> >  >
> >  > Indeed too complicated, especially taking into account
> that I have something like 100 patches using the same thick lines. So it is
> not Gem related according to you but openGL?
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 8:29 AM cyrille henry <
> c...@chnry.net  >> wrote:
> >  >
> >  > hello,
> >  >
> >  > The width message is working as expected here.
> >  > GEM: ver: 0.94.git v0.94-351-g2ba06167
> >  > GEM: compiled  on Jan 12 2023
> >  >
> >  > Can you send the test patch you are using, or try the
> curve-help file and tell us if the width message is working?
> >  >
> >  > if it's not a patch problem, it's the hardware that
> can't interpret this message. What is your GPU?
> >  >
> >  > cheers
> >  > C
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > Le 19/09/2023 à 23:33, Csaba Láng a écrit :
> >  >  > By the way, the same issue with the circle object.
> [width $1( is just ignored with the draw line message.
> >  >  >
> >  >  > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:15 PM Csaba Láng <
> langcs...@gmail.com   langcs...@gmail.com >  langcs...@gmail.com   langcs...@gmail.com  >  >  >
> >  >  > You are right, wrong word I used. I meant
> installing Gem 0.94 from Deken.
> >  >  >
> >  >  > On Tue, Sep 19, 202