Re: [PD] ASIO SDK

[Roman Haefeli]

On Sun, 2016-03-20 at 23:42 +, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> That's a good reason for doing a physical release of the GUI port on
> CD ROM.

I know you are joking. Still, let me put it this way: They want you to
show their ASIO logo everywhere you provide your software, on the
physical package or on the download page. 

Roman



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] ASIO SDK

[Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list]

That's a good reason for doing a physical release of the GUI port on CD ROM.

-Jonathan
 

On Sunday, March 20, 2016 4:13 AM, Roman Haefeli  wrote:
 

 On Sam, 2016-03-19 at 19:03 +, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
> Ok, thanks.
> 
> 
> As for the README-- they actually don't require the whole email dance
> to get the code anymore:
> http://www.steinberg.net/en/company/developers.html
> 
> 
> 
> Not sure whether this means I can skip the dance if I'm distributing
> binaries 
> build using that...


The included licensing agreement looks like if you're supposed to print
it, fill out the form, sign it and send it to Steinberg, though I
couldn't find any clear statement saying so. 

Most of it looks reasonable and seems not to be hindering your use case
of including it in a Pd binary and make it available for download (I
don't need to mention I'm not a lawyer!), BUT:

from §3 1. b)

"b) In case the ASIO Driver Compliant Product is published without a
physical package (e.g. download), the Licensee shall display the ASIO
Logo and Steinberg’s copyrights notice on the Licensee’s website in the
context of the ASIO Driver Compliant Product."


Roman
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


  ___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] ASIO SDK

[Roman Haefeli]

On Sam, 2016-03-19 at 19:03 +, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
> Ok, thanks.
> 
> 
> As for the README-- they actually don't require the whole email dance
> to get the code anymore:
> http://www.steinberg.net/en/company/developers.html
> 
> 
> 
> Not sure whether this means I can skip the dance if I'm distributing
> binaries 
> build using that...


The included licensing agreement looks like if you're supposed to print
it, fill out the form, sign it and send it to Steinberg, though I
couldn't find any clear statement saying so. 

Most of it looks reasonable and seems not to be hindering your use case
of including it in a Pd binary and make it available for download (I
don't need to mention I'm not a lawyer!), BUT:

from §3 1. b)

"b) In case the ASIO Driver Compliant Product is published without a
physical package (e.g. download), the Licensee shall display the ASIO
Logo and Steinberg’s copyrights notice on the Licensee’s website in the
context of the ASIO Driver Compliant Product."


Roman


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] ASIO SDK

[Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list]

Ok, thanks.
As for the README-- they actually don't require the whole email dance to get 
the code anymore:http://www.steinberg.net/en/company/developers.html

Not sure whether this means I can skip the dance if I'm distributing binaries 
build using that...
-Jonathan

 

On Saturday, March 19, 2016 1:22 PM, Miller Puckette  wrote:
 

 Yes and yes... I'm using the 'official ASIO SDK 2.3, which I can't distribute
the source or header files for.  Details in pd/asio/README.txt (although I
see I didn't update the version number in the README).

cheers
Miller

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 04:17:53PM +, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
> Miller,Is the Windows binary you ship for Pd compiled using the ASIO SDK from 
> Steinberg?
> If so, did you have to sign some licensing garbage in order to do that?
> Thanks,Jonathan

> ___
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



  ___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] ASIO SDK

[Miller Puckette]

Yes and yes... I'm using the 'official ASIO SDK 2.3, which I can't distribute
the source or header files for.  Details in pd/asio/README.txt (although I
see I didn't update the version number in the README).

cheers
Miller

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 04:17:53PM +, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
> Miller,Is the Windows binary you ship for Pd compiled using the ASIO SDK from 
> Steinberg?
> If so, did you have to sign some licensing garbage in order to do that?
> Thanks,Jonathan

> ___
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] ASIO SDK

[Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list]

Miller,Is the Windows binary you ship for Pd compiled using the ASIO SDK from 
Steinberg?
If so, did you have to sign some licensing garbage in order to do that?
Thanks,Jonathan___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list