Re: [PD] Dynamic Patching with 0.47
On 2016-06-20 03:38, Miller Puckette wrote: > (I keep wanting to make some > sort of "delete" message to canvases but can't figure out what would be a > usable design). what's wrong with the index that can be found everywhere else? e.g. iemguts adds a "delete" message (to the canvas) that takes a single number: https://git.iem.at/pd/iemguts/blob/master/src/canvasdelete.c (actually it takes a list of numbers, but i've never used that). so using "delete " whould be: - consistent with the current user-interface (e.g. "connect") - backward compatible with prior implementations fgamsdr IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Dynamic Patching with 0.47
I made some changes in the "find" dialog and its communications with Pd -
sorry if this has (apparently) mixed things up. (I keep wanting to make some
sort of "delete" message to canvases but can't figure out what would be a
usable design).
Miller
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 01:36:00AM +0200, Thomas Mayer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with Pd 0.47 in Debian dynamically deleting objects does not work anymore.
>
> When I open my abstraction
> https://github.com/residuum/Puredata-abstractions/blob/master/glue/switch-matrix.pd,
> I get an error in the console
>
> (Tcl) INVALID COMMAND NAME: invalid command name ".find.entry"
>while executing
> ".find.entry get"
>(procedure "pdtk_showfindresult" line 10)
>invoked from within
> "pdtk_showfindresult .x90a2a58 1 1 35"
>("uplevel" body line 483)
>invoked from within
> "uplevel #0 $docmds"
>
> and a series of
>
> error: consistency check failed: sys_decodedialog: inlet
>
> followed by a series of
>
> error: .x90a2a58: no such object
>
> I boils down to the subpatch "delete-inlets", which is a series of
>
> [$0 find inlet 1(
>
> [$0 findagain(
>
> [$0 cut(
>
> [$0 dirty 0, menuclose 1(
>
> Has there a change in the implementation of [; find( or [; findagain(?
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
> --
> "As long as people kept worrying that the machines were taking over,
> they wouldn't notice what was really happening. Which was that the
> programmers were taking over." (Robert Anton Wilson - The Homing Pidgeons)
> http://www.residuum.org/
>
> ___
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] Dynamic Patching with 0.47
Hi,
with Pd 0.47 in Debian dynamically deleting objects does not work anymore.
When I open my abstraction
https://github.com/residuum/Puredata-abstractions/blob/master/glue/switch-matrix.pd,
I get an error in the console
(Tcl) INVALID COMMAND NAME: invalid command name ".find.entry"
while executing
".find.entry get"
(procedure "pdtk_showfindresult" line 10)
invoked from within
"pdtk_showfindresult .x90a2a58 1 1 35"
("uplevel" body line 483)
invoked from within
"uplevel #0 $docmds"
and a series of
error: consistency check failed: sys_decodedialog: inlet
followed by a series of
error: .x90a2a58: no such object
I boils down to the subpatch "delete-inlets", which is a series of
[$0 find inlet 1(
[$0 findagain(
[$0 cut(
[$0 dirty 0, menuclose 1(
Has there a change in the implementation of [; find( or [; findagain(?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
"As long as people kept worrying that the machines were taking over,
they wouldn't notice what was really happening. Which was that the
programmers were taking over." (Robert Anton Wilson - The Homing Pidgeons)
http://www.residuum.org/
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
