Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches?
Check how the rjlib OVERVIEW.pd patch works: https://github.com/rjdj/rjlib/tree/master/rj <https://github.com/rjdj/rjlib/tree/master/rj> > On Jun 2, 2017, at 6:08 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > From: Liam Goodacre <liamg...@hotmail.com <mailto:liamg...@hotmail.com>> > Subject: Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches? > Date: June 2, 2017 at 5:42:51 AM CDT > To: PD list <pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>> > > > Hi Roman > > Context, the system I'm documenting, is far too big to be explained in a > single help-patch, so I want the 'context-help.pd' file to function more like > a Table of Contents for the rest of the documentation (plus a few quick > examples). It would be nice if the TOC could link to other files. > > -Liam Dan Wilcox @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches?
> The [link] object is great for linking between help files, but I don't know how many people use it now that Extended has gone. By way of a survey, how many people have this external installed already? Seems like it will just be a nuisance if people have to download it just to read a help patch, but on the other hand it's a shame to give up on it since it's such a useful tool. Is it really named "link"? That name clashes with pmpd/link In Purr Data/Pd-l2ork (and Pd-extended) there are these:pddp/pddplink: link to a pd patch or external text/html filepddp/helplink: link to the help patch for a Pd object helplink lets you cross-reference other objects without having to load their libraries or instantiate them. For example: imagine that the [bar] help patch author has a "related objects" subpatch with another author's object [foo] in it. Now, imagine the author of [foo] changes the implementation of [foo] so that it allocates hundreds of megabytes when [foo] gets created. If you use [helplink], then only users who are interested in [foo] will experience crashes. If not, any user who opens a help patch with a "related object" [foo] may experience a crash. The first group is almost always smaller than the second group, and that's why helplink was created. -Jonathan p.s.-- this (now fixed) out-of-memory bug is a true story > Assuming that it's not widely used any more, are there any other ways of > opening a relative path from within PD? ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches?
On Fre, 2017-06-02 at 10:42 +, Liam Goodacre wrote: > Hi Roman > > Context, the system I'm documenting, is far too big to be explained > in a single help-patch, so I want the 'context-help.pd' file to > function more like a Table of Contents for the rest of the > documentation (plus a few quick examples). It would be nice if the > TOC could link to other files. When you want to use [pddplink], I'd simply do so and declare it a dependency of your system. I wouldn't care so much about what users have already installed, I'd rather care whether dependencies are easily available/installable. If [pddplink] is in deken, the most important thing is to document that Context requires pddplink (or whatever the library is called). Roman > From: Pd-list <pd-list-boun...@lists.iem.at> on behalf of Roman > Haefeli <reduz...@gmail.com> > Sent: 02 June 2017 11:03 > To: pd-list@lists.iem.at > Subject: Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches? > > On Fre, 2017-06-02 at 09:45 +, Liam Goodacre wrote: > > Hi José > > > > This will only work with a pre-loaded abstraction or subpatch. I'm > > talking about opening a new file that isn't already loaded. > > > > You can open files like this: > > > > [; pd open file.pd my/directory( > > > > but it will only work with absolute, not relative directory paths. > > It works with relative paths, too, but relative to Pd's start > locaction > and not relative to calling patch (which basically boils down to > absolute in practice). > > > Why not simply create the object/abstraction, so that you just right- > click -> help when you want to follow the 'link'? It's how many help- > patches, including the ones of Pd, reference other objects. > > Roman > > > > > From: José de Abreu <abreubace...@gmail.com> > > Sent: 02 June 2017 10:21 > > To: Liam Goodacre; PD list > > Subject: Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches? > > > > Maybe > > |; pd-nameOfSubpatch vis 1( > > > > Em Sex, 2 de jun de 2017 03:03, Liam Goodacre <liamg...@hotmail.com > > > > escreveu: > > > The [link] object is great for linking between help files, but I > > > don't know how many people use it now that Extended has gone. By > > > way of a survey, how many people have this external installed > > > already? Seems like it will just be a nuisance if people have to > > > download it just to read a help patch, but on the other hand it's > a > > > shame to give up on it since it's such a useful tool. > > > > > > Assuming that it's not widely used any more, are there any other > > > ways of opening a relative path from within PD? > > > ___ > > > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info > /l > > > istinfo/pd-list > > > > > ___ > > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/l > is > > tinfo/pd-list > ___ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/lis > tinfo/pd-list signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches?
On Fre, 2017-06-02 at 10:42 +, Liam Goodacre wrote: > Hi Roman > > Context, the system I'm documenting, is far too big to be explained > in a single help-patch, so I want the 'context-help.pd' file to > function more like a Table of Contents for the rest of the > documentation (plus a few quick examples). It would be nice if the > TOC could link to other files. Hm...still sounds to like the patch you get when you right-click -> help on an empty space in a Pd canvas: doc/5.reference/help-intro.pd It references all available objects by instantiating them. You can righ-click -> select help on any of them. Roman signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches?
Hi Roman Context, the system I'm documenting, is far too big to be explained in a single help-patch, so I want the 'context-help.pd' file to function more like a Table of Contents for the rest of the documentation (plus a few quick examples). It would be nice if the TOC could link to other files. -Liam From: Pd-list <pd-list-boun...@lists.iem.at> on behalf of Roman Haefeli <reduz...@gmail.com> Sent: 02 June 2017 11:03 To: pd-list@lists.iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches? On Fre, 2017-06-02 at 09:45 +, Liam Goodacre wrote: > Hi José > > This will only work with a pre-loaded abstraction or subpatch. I'm > talking about opening a new file that isn't already loaded. > > You can open files like this: > > [; pd open file.pd my/directory( > > but it will only work with absolute, not relative directory paths. It works with relative paths, too, but relative to Pd's start locaction and not relative to calling patch (which basically boils down to absolute in practice). Why not simply create the object/abstraction, so that you just right- click -> help when you want to follow the 'link'? It's how many help- patches, including the ones of Pd, reference other objects. Roman > From: José de Abreu <abreubace...@gmail.com> > Sent: 02 June 2017 10:21 > To: Liam Goodacre; PD list > Subject: Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches? > > Maybe > |; pd-nameOfSubpatch vis 1( > > Em Sex, 2 de jun de 2017 03:03, Liam Goodacre <liamg...@hotmail.com> > escreveu: > > The [link] object is great for linking between help files, but I > > don't know how many people use it now that Extended has gone. By > > way of a survey, how many people have this external installed > > already? Seems like it will just be a nuisance if people have to > > download it just to read a help patch, but on the other hand it's a > > shame to give up on it since it's such a useful tool. > > > > Assuming that it's not widely used any more, are there any other > > ways of opening a relative path from within PD? > > ___ > > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/l > > istinfo/pd-list > > > ___ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/lis > tinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches?
On Fre, 2017-06-02 at 09:45 +, Liam Goodacre wrote: > Hi José > > This will only work with a pre-loaded abstraction or subpatch. I'm > talking about opening a new file that isn't already loaded. > > You can open files like this: > > [; pd open file.pd my/directory( > > but it will only work with absolute, not relative directory paths. It works with relative paths, too, but relative to Pd's start locaction and not relative to calling patch (which basically boils down to absolute in practice). Why not simply create the object/abstraction, so that you just right- click -> help when you want to follow the 'link'? It's how many help- patches, including the ones of Pd, reference other objects. Roman > From: José de Abreu <abreubace...@gmail.com> > Sent: 02 June 2017 10:21 > To: Liam Goodacre; PD list > Subject: Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches? > > Maybe > |; pd-nameOfSubpatch vis 1( > > Em Sex, 2 de jun de 2017 03:03, Liam Goodacre <liamg...@hotmail.com> > escreveu: > > The [link] object is great for linking between help files, but I > > don't know how many people use it now that Extended has gone. By > > way of a survey, how many people have this external installed > > already? Seems like it will just be a nuisance if people have to > > download it just to read a help patch, but on the other hand it's a > > shame to give up on it since it's such a useful tool. > > > > Assuming that it's not widely used any more, are there any other > > ways of opening a relative path from within PD? > > ___ > > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/l > > istinfo/pd-list > > > ___ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/lis > tinfo/pd-list signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches?
Hi José This will only work with a pre-loaded abstraction or subpatch. I'm talking about opening a new file that isn't already loaded. You can open files like this: [; pd open file.pd my/directory( but it will only work with absolute, not relative directory paths. From: José de Abreu <abreubace...@gmail.com> Sent: 02 June 2017 10:21 To: Liam Goodacre; PD list Subject: Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches? Maybe |; pd-nameOfSubpatch vis 1( Em Sex, 2 de jun de 2017 03:03, Liam Goodacre <liamg...@hotmail.com<mailto:liamg...@hotmail.com>> escreveu: The [link] object is great for linking between help files, but I don't know how many people use it now that Extended has gone. By way of a survey, how many people have this external installed already? Seems like it will just be a nuisance if people have to download it just to read a help patch, but on the other hand it's a shame to give up on it since it's such a useful tool. Assuming that it's not widely used any more, are there any other ways of opening a relative path from within PD? ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at<mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at> mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches?
Maybe |; pd-nameOfSubpatch vis 1( Em Sex, 2 de jun de 2017 03:03, Liam Goodacreescreveu: > The [link] object is great for linking between help files, but I don't > know how many people use it now that Extended has gone. By way of a survey, > how many people have this external installed already? Seems like it will > just be a nuisance if people have to download it just to read a help patch, > but on the other hand it's a shame to give up on it since it's such a > useful tool. > > > Assuming that it's not widely used any more, are there any other ways of > opening a relative path from within PD? > ___ > Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] should I use pddp/link in help patches?
The [link] object is great for linking between help files, but I don't know how many people use it now that Extended has gone. By way of a survey, how many people have this external installed already? Seems like it will just be a nuisance if people have to download it just to read a help patch, but on the other hand it's a shame to give up on it since it's such a useful tool. Assuming that it's not widely used any more, are there any other ways of opening a relative path from within PD? ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list