Re: [PD] pix_film performances question

2017-12-17 Thread Jack 
I have a recent Gem version. With the same video loaded with 12
[pix_film], the CPU go from 1% to 5%.
First, it increase to 65% and goes down to 5%.
++

Jack



Le 17/12/2017 à 16:56, Nicola Pandini a écrit :
> woops, forget that, sorry :-)
> 
> I'm using a Debian Stretch with puredata 0.47.1 and Gem 0.93.3
> To test that, you can simply create 10-15 pix_film objects, and load the
> same video to every pix_film. If you just do that, you'll see the cpu
> usage going up.
> 
> Il 17/12/2017 11:36, Jack ha scritto:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Do you have a simple patch ?
>> Which OS, Pd and Gem version ?
>> ++
>>
>> Jack
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 17/12/2017 à 11:16, Nicola Pandini a écrit :
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> I've a problem with a patch with a lot of pix_film objects.
>>>
>>> I noticed that pix_film starts consuming cpu when it loads a video, and
>>> it never reduce the consuming, even when playback is stopped, or when
>>> its gemhead is disabled.
>>> Is it a bug? Are there any workarounds?
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> 


___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pix_film performances question

2017-12-17 Thread Nicola Pandini 

Oh, good news, thanks. I'll try to compile and test that.

Il 17/12/2017 14:30, Antoine Rousseau ha scritto:

Hi,
this should be fixed in next release, with:
https://github.com/umlaeute/Gem/pull/138 "change sleep time of 
pix_film's grabThread() from 100us to 5ms"



Antoine Rousseau
http://www.metalu.net  __ 
http://www.metaluachahuter.com/ 




2017-12-17 11:16 GMT+01:00 Nicola Pandini >:


Hi list,

I've a problem with a patch with a lot of pix_film objects.

I noticed that pix_film starts consuming cpu when it loads a
video, and it never reduce the consuming, even when playback is
stopped, or when its gemhead is disabled.
Is it a bug? Are there any workarounds?

-- 
Nicola Pandini

t


___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at  mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list





--
Nicola Pandini
http://nicolapandini.damai.it

___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pix_film performances question

2017-12-17 Thread Nicola Pandini 

woops, forget that, sorry :-)

I'm using a Debian Stretch with puredata 0.47.1 and Gem 0.93.3
To test that, you can simply create 10-15 pix_film objects, and load the 
same video to every pix_film. If you just do that, you'll see the cpu 
usage going up.


Il 17/12/2017 11:36, Jack ha scritto:

Hello,

Do you have a simple patch ?
Which OS, Pd and Gem version ?
++

Jack



Le 17/12/2017 à 11:16, Nicola Pandini a écrit :

Hi list,

I've a problem with a patch with a lot of pix_film objects.

I noticed that pix_film starts consuming cpu when it loads a video, and
it never reduce the consuming, even when playback is stopped, or when
its gemhead is disabled.
Is it a bug? Are there any workarounds?



___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



--
Nicola Pandini
http://nicolapandini.damai.it


___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pix_film performances question

2017-12-17 Thread Antoine Rousseau 
Hi,
this should be fixed in next release, with:
https://github.com/umlaeute/Gem/pull/138 "change sleep time of pix_film's
grabThread() from 100us to 5ms"


Antoine Rousseau
  http://www.metalu.net  __
http://www.metaluachahuter.com/



2017-12-17 11:16 GMT+01:00 Nicola Pandini :

> Hi list,
>
> I've a problem with a patch with a lot of pix_film objects.
>
> I noticed that pix_film starts consuming cpu when it loads a video, and it
> never reduce the consuming, even when playback is stopped, or when its
> gemhead is disabled.
> Is it a bug? Are there any workarounds?
>
> --
> Nicola Pandini
> t
>
>
> ___
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/li
> stinfo/pd-list
>
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pix_film performances question

2017-12-17 Thread Jack 
Hello,

Do you have a simple patch ?
Which OS, Pd and Gem version ?
++

Jack



Le 17/12/2017 à 11:16, Nicola Pandini a écrit :
> Hi list,
> 
> I've a problem with a patch with a lot of pix_film objects.
> 
> I noticed that pix_film starts consuming cpu when it loads a video, and
> it never reduce the consuming, even when playback is stopped, or when
> its gemhead is disabled.
> Is it a bug? Are there any workarounds?
> 


___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list