Re: PESO: Peuplingues

2021-01-28 Thread Alan C
If those are rejects, the one which made it must be out of this world. 
Perhaps you had a secret stint in the ISS?


Alan C

On 29-Jan-21 02:18 AM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:

And the last one that didn't make it into next month's PUG. Near the
village of Peuplingues (another bird, Ann?) in the hinterlands of Cape
Blanc Nez near Calais.

https://www.fotocommunity.de/photo/peuplingues-avenue-du-point-de-vue/44802435 



Enjoy
Ralf

--
Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog  : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web   : http://www.fotoralf.de




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: spiny orb-weaver (photo of a spider in the link)

2021-01-28 Thread Subash Jeyan
thanks Igor and to everyone else who looked or had nice things to say.
i've passed them on to adit...

i think some variation (at least going by colour) of the first of your
spiders are found here too... PESO when adit gets it :)


On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:57:02 -0500 (EST)
Igor PDML-StR  wrote:

> Subash, that's a very nice picture of a fun-looking creature!
> 
> 
> Larry, it indeed seems to be a bit more colorful than those that I
> see photographed here, but yet, they can be quite unusual here as
> well. Here is what photographed back in 2015:
> http://42graphy.org/misc/2015-06-10-spider/
> (Still, Adit's photo has a much better clarity, and more color.)
> 
> (I've posted mine to PDML back then:
> http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net/2015-June/398698.html )

> > http://something-feathered.in/2021/01/27/spiny-orb-weaver/
> >
> > comments always appreciated, subash  
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


PESO -- Circular Waterfall 2021 & an enablement.

2021-01-28 Thread P. J. Alling
I guess this is kind of and enablement post as well as a PESO. Ever 
since the destruction of my funky, 60's vintage Sigma* 12mm semi 
circular fish eye, which was pretty much a full frame fisheye on APS-C 
digital, I've been on the lookout for a good deal on a fisheye lens to 
use on my K-3 and K-5II.  A couple of weeks ago I was able to get a Like 
New in Box copy of the Pentax DA 10-17mm Fish Eye zoom and decided to 
test it out at Chatfield Hollow State Park, on their Circular Water 
Feature.  It was bitterly cold but the lens and camera didn't disappoint 
me, even if the rendering software did.


I've discovered something really annoying about DXO Optics Pro 9.  When 
applying corrections to the afore mentioned 10-17mm, it seriously 
defishes it by default.  I don't know how to tell it to not do this 
except by removing the lens correction module.  I'm going to contact DxO 
and ask them if they understand the point of a fish eye lens, because 
they apparently don't.


I'm too tired right now to try how to figure out how to get the full 
fish eye effect, so you'll just have to put up with the defished image 
for now.


http://webster26.epizy.com/peso/PESO--CircularWaterfall2021.html

Equipment: Pentax K-3 w/PENTAX DA 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 ED (IF) Fish-Eye Zoom.

As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.

* It wasn't labeled Sigma but that's who made those lenses, Waterhouse 
stops and all.


--
Any idiot can shoot with a Canon, Nikon, or Sony, it takes a special kind of 
idiot to use a Pentax.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Peuplingues

2021-01-28 Thread ann sanfedele
hmm no .. perhaps an Australian marsupial or a confused semiotician or 
language scholar..


nice shot -- is  the original in color?  I love that kind of landscape..

geez I haven't gotten my entry in yet either glad you posted your rejects

ann

On 1/28/2021 7:18 PM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:

And the last one that didn't make it into next month's PUG. Near the
village of Peuplingues (another bird, Ann?) in the hinterlands of Cape
Blanc Nez near Calais.

https://www.fotocommunity.de/photo/peuplingues-avenue-du-point-de-vue/44802435 



Enjoy
Ralf

--
Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog  : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web   : http://www.fotoralf.de



--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


PESO: Peuplingues

2021-01-28 Thread Ralf R Radermacher

And the last one that didn't make it into next month's PUG. Near the
village of Peuplingues (another bird, Ann?) in the hinterlands of Cape
Blanc Nez near Calais.

https://www.fotocommunity.de/photo/peuplingues-avenue-du-point-de-vue/44802435

Enjoy
Ralf

--
Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog  : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web   : http://www.fotoralf.de

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO x 2 : Queen iof the Night

2021-01-28 Thread ann sanfedele

alan -- thats a keeper for sure...
ann

On 1/25/2021 10:31 PM, Alan C wrote:
Thanks for the comments Rick, Dan & (ahem!) Bob. Cultivated in many 
parts of the world as "Dragon Fruit" (a big, red fruit), even in 
Hawaii. I'll look out for those. I saw there were more buds still to 
open.


Pitaya - Wikipedia 

Alan C

On 25-Jan-21 08:29 PM, Rick Womer wrote:

What Dan said.

You have very intersting flora and fauna down there…

Rick

On Jan 25, 2021, at 11:46 AM, Daniel J. Matyola 
 wrote:


That is lovely!  The image 9of the single bloom really "pops"!

Dan Matyola
*https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery
*



On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 2:50 AM Alan C  wrote:


These images are of an invasive, climbing Cactus (Hylocereus Undatus)
known here as the "Queen of the Night" originating from Central 
America.

They only flower for few hours at night & in the early morning so this
was a lucky sighting. I rushed home from my jog to get my camera. The
pollinating agents are Bats. These plants became a problem in the 
Natal
coastal forests & a big effort was necessary to eradicate them.  
Scroll

for the other.

Queen of the Night (Hylocereus Undatus) | Alan Cole | Flickr
<
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/50873302252/in/datetaken-public/ 


K5 & DA 18-55 WR on a wet, grey day.

Alan C
<
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/50873302252/in/datetaken-public/> 




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above 
and follow the directions.






--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Cockerill

2021-01-28 Thread Ralf R Radermacher

Am 28.01.21 um 23:43 schrieb ann sanfedele:

also sounds like a bird's name :-)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Cockerill_(industrialist)

Ralf

--
Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog  : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web   : http://www.fotoralf.de

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESOs (6) - Morris Arboretum

2021-01-28 Thread ann sanfedele
I wondered what the tangled structure was..  imagining whta it looks 
like when in foliange...


I like the photo with the perfectly placed swans the best...

ann

On 1/25/2021 10:33 PM, Alan C wrote:
Very interesting. Apart from lack of foliage it hardly looks wintery. 
Clever maze idea.


Alan C

On 26-Jan-21 03:31 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
Sunday we took a walk in the Morris Arboretum, which near the 
northernmost edge of Philadelphia. It has beautiful landscaping and a 
huge variety of trees and shrubs from all over the world. We hadn’t 
been there in the winter before, and it was interesting to see the 
geometry of the trees without leaves.


https://rickwomer.smugmug.com/2021/January-2021/Morris-Arboretum/

The last photo is of a living sculpture of willow saplings and 
branches, titled “Loop de Loop.” It is also a maze with about a dozen 
rooms.


Applause, catcalls, and indifferent shrugs all accepted.

Rick








--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: spiny orb-weaver (photo of a spider in the link)

2021-01-28 Thread ann sanfedele

cute little girl.. and so well captured...
and the critter the spider is holding on to is even smaller.. fascinating

ann

On 1/27/2021 10:39 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:

Very interesting critter.  Well seen, photographed and presented!

Dan Matyola
*https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery
*



On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 1:32 AM Subash Jeyan  wrote:


not something feathered! a spider called by spiny orb-weaver which is
less than 1 cm across. shot by Adit during our recent trip to
masinagudi. i think he used pentax kp, tamron 90/2.8 macro and the
raynox dcr-250.


http://something-feathered.in/2021/01/27/spiny-orb-weaver/

comments always appreciated, subash

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.



--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Tardinghen

2021-01-28 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Quite nice!

Dan Matyola
*https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery
*



On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 4:47 PM Ralf R Radermacher  wrote:

> One of my contenders for this month's PUG that didn't make it:
>
> The French side of the Dovwer Strait. In the front the village of
> Tardinghen, then Wissant with its enormous beach and Escalles at the
> foot of Cape Blanc Nez.
>
> A nice example for the wonderful quality of the Pentax M 2/85 mm lens
>
>
> https://www.fotocommunity.fr/photo/tardinghen-avenue-du-point-de-vue/44802129
>
> Autumn 2008, Pentax K10D
>
> Enjoy
> Ralf
>
> --
> Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
> Blog  : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
> Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
> Web   : http://www.fotoralf.de
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Cockerill

2021-01-28 Thread ann sanfedele

also sounds like a bird's name :-)

but the shot and the story are nice anyway

ann

On 1/28/2021 5:10 PM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:

From a series of historic signs which I've recently uploaded to
fotocommunity. The company Cockerill has changed its name several times
over the last four decades and is today part of Arcelor-Mittal.

Even older than that sign is the writing on the wall behind it. The
UCMLB, the Union des Communistes Marxistes-Léninistes de Belgique, a
maoist faction of the Belgian communist party, had already disbanded
itself in 1976. The photo dates from 2005.

https://www.fotocommunity.de/photo/das-historische-schild-cockerill-seraing-fotoralfbe/44774222 



Enjoy
Ralf

--
Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog  : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web   : http://www.fotoralf.de



--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Tardinghen

2021-01-28 Thread ann sanfedele

I expected a bird photo...

But the landscape is very nice

ann

On 1/28/2021 4:46 PM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:

One of my contenders for this month's PUG that didn't make it:

The French side of the Dovwer Strait. In the front the village of
Tardinghen, then Wissant with its enormous beach and Escalles at the
foot of Cape Blanc Nez.

A nice example for the wonderful quality of the Pentax M 2/85 mm lens

https://www.fotocommunity.fr/photo/tardinghen-avenue-du-point-de-vue/44802129 



Autumn 2008, Pentax K10D

Enjoy
Ralf

--
Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog  : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web   : http://www.fotoralf.de



--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: For fucks sake

2021-01-28 Thread ann sanfedele

but how do you really feel ?? :-)

ann

On 1/28/2021 3:29 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:



This is a #@%^&*+ dumb article! :-)
(And full of bovine scatology.)


On a serious note, this is a questionable quality article relying on 
questionable (IMHO - incorrect!) research results (conclusions).


I have discussed this article yesterday and today with a friend who 
actually works in medical research. We guessed that most likely the 
journalist was given an assignment to write something by the deadline 
(possibly on the subject), so she googled something and came up with 
some superficial conclusions, without much of critical thinking, and 
got paid for that mumbo-jumbo.


Besides having some wrong conclusions, what also adds to that 
impression is that the journalist does not seem to demonstrate 
understanding of how scientific research (publications) works: One of 
the referenced papers is a manuscript at the stage when it was 
submitted for publication. I actually have doubts if the journalist 
has actually verified whether it was published in a peer-reviewed 
journal. (I checked, it was.) [*]



Now, about the underlying research:
At least the first research article quoted by the journalist is flawed.
(I am reluctant to analyze in detail all of them.) [**]

The biggest problem about it is non-representative choice of the study 
participants. They had three studies, but all of them used college 
students taking psychology courses:
"A total of 43 participants (30 women) were recruited from 
introductory psychology courses at a small liberal arts college <...> 
Their ages ranged from 18 to 22 years ..."
"A total of 49 participants (34 women) were recruited from 
introductory psychology courses at a small liberal arts college <...>. 
Their ages ranged from 18 to 22 years ..."
"Participants were 126 college students aged 18–38 years (86 women 
<...>) enrolled in an introductory psychology course at a small 
liberal arts college."


That is a very narrow category of the study participants, with a 
higher than average educational/cultural/social/... level.
I am sure if they took people from other socio-demographic groups, 
especially from the lower social levels, they would've seen quite 
different results.



To summarize, the study reported is not necessarily representative for 
the entire society. And the authors fail to acknowledge that fact.

(If I were the referee, I would've pointed this out, and would not have
recommended this article for publication unless a clear explicit 
statement about that serious limitation is made. - I've done similar 
recommendations on multiple occasions - in my field.)



This is a good example of how a [wrong] message from unscrupulous 
scientists can be amplified by low-quality journalists. This type of 
situations undermine the role of science in our society (leading to a 
wide-spread skepticism toward the science in the society).


My apology for being a party pooper... :-)


=
[*]
Let me clarify this point for those who might not be familiar with how 
scientific publications work. The author(s) submits a manuscript to 
the editor for publication. The editor takes a look - to determine who 
would be good reviewers, and sends it to those for review.  Based on 
the reviewers' comments and recommendations, the editor makes a 
decision: to publish, to reject, or to give an opportunity to make 
improvements, in which case, the article can go through an additional, 
similar, round of review.
I've refereed many manuscripts. A significant portion of those were 
not suitable for publication without significant revision. Some of the 
manuscripts should have never been published (and usually they weren't).


So, the bottom line is that a peer review is an important tool to weed 
out improper articles. So if an article hasn't passed it, - its 
results and conclusions might not be reliable.

However, it is important to recognize that the peer-review is not a
guarantee. Moreover, there are peer-reviewed publications that are 
wrong. Some of those should not have passed through the peer-review, 
others were found to be wrong by the subsequent studies stimulated by 
them. The latter is a normal scientific discovery process.)


[**] I am not claiming all conclusions are wrong, - but even some of 
them being wrong make the entire article wrong.



Cheers,

Igor



ann sanfedele Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:41:36 -0800 wrote:

great article - works for me regularly

ann


On 1/27/2021 10:03 AM, Bill wrote:


https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/26/health/swearing-benefits-wellness/index.html 




    It definitely makes me feel better

    bill





--
ann sanfedele photography
https://annsan.smugmug.com
https://www.cafepress.com/+ann-sanfedele+gifts
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/annsan
https://www.createphotocalendars.com/Shop/annsanfedelecalendarsandbooks


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please vis

PESO: Cockerill

2021-01-28 Thread Ralf R Radermacher

From a series of historic signs which I've recently uploaded to
fotocommunity. The company Cockerill has changed its name several times
over the last four decades and is today part of Arcelor-Mittal.

Even older than that sign is the writing on the wall behind it. The
UCMLB, the Union des Communistes Marxistes-Léninistes de Belgique, a
maoist faction of the Belgian communist party, had already disbanded
itself in 1976. The photo dates from 2005.

https://www.fotocommunity.de/photo/das-historische-schild-cockerill-seraing-fotoralfbe/44774222

Enjoy
Ralf

--
Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog  : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web   : http://www.fotoralf.de

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: PESO: Tardinghen

2021-01-28 Thread Bob Pdml
That’s a beautiful scene, beautifully shot

> On 28 Jan 2021, at 21:47, Ralf R Radermacher  wrote:
> 
> One of my contenders for this month's PUG that didn't make it:
> 
> The French side of the Dovwer Strait. In the front the village of
> Tardinghen, then Wissant with its enormous beach and Escalles at the
> foot of Cape Blanc Nez.
> 
> A nice example for the wonderful quality of the Pentax M 2/85 mm lens
> 
> https://www.fotocommunity.fr/photo/tardinghen-avenue-du-point-de-vue/44802129
> 
> Autumn 2008, Pentax K10D
> 
> Enjoy
> Ralf
> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


PESO: Tardinghen

2021-01-28 Thread Ralf R Radermacher

One of my contenders for this month's PUG that didn't make it:

The French side of the Dovwer Strait. In the front the village of
Tardinghen, then Wissant with its enormous beach and Escalles at the
foot of Cape Blanc Nez.

A nice example for the wonderful quality of the Pentax M 2/85 mm lens

https://www.fotocommunity.fr/photo/tardinghen-avenue-du-point-de-vue/44802129

Autumn 2008, Pentax K10D

Enjoy
Ralf

--
Ralf R. Radermacher  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog  : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web   : http://www.fotoralf.de

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: For fucks sake

2021-01-28 Thread Igor PDML-StR



This is a #@%^&*+ dumb article! :-)
(And full of bovine scatology.)


On a serious note, this is a questionable quality article relying on 
questionable (IMHO - incorrect!) research results (conclusions).


I have discussed this article yesterday and today with a friend who 
actually works in medical research. We guessed that most likely the 
journalist was given an assignment to write something by the deadline 
(possibly on the subject), so she googled something and came up with some 
superficial conclusions, without much of critical thinking, and got paid 
for that mumbo-jumbo.


Besides having some wrong conclusions, what also adds to that impression 
is that the journalist does not seem to demonstrate understanding of how 
scientific research (publications) works: One of the referenced papers is a 
manuscript at the stage when it was submitted for publication. I actually 
have doubts if the journalist has actually verified whether it was 
published in a peer-reviewed journal. (I checked, it was.) [*]



Now, about the underlying research:
At least the first research article quoted by the journalist is flawed.
(I am reluctant to analyze in detail all of them.) [**]

The biggest problem about it is non-representative choice of the study 
participants. They had three studies, but all of them used college 
students taking psychology courses:
"A total of 43 participants (30 women) were recruited from introductory 
psychology courses at a small liberal arts college <...> Their ages ranged 
from 18 to 22 years ..."
"A total of 49 participants (34 women) were recruited from introductory 
psychology courses at a small liberal arts college <...>. Their ages 
ranged from 18 to 22 years ..."
"Participants were 126 college students aged 18–38 years (86 women <...>) 
enrolled in an introductory psychology course at a small liberal arts college."


That is a very narrow category of the study participants, with a higher 
than average educational/cultural/social/... level.
I am sure if they took people from other socio-demographic groups, 
especially from the lower social levels, they would've seen quite 
different results.



To summarize, the study reported is not necessarily representative for the 
entire society. And the authors fail to acknowledge that fact.

(If I were the referee, I would've pointed this out, and would not have
recommended this article for publication unless a clear explicit statement 
about that serious limitation is made. - I've done similar recommendations 
on multiple occasions - in my field.)



This is a good example of how a [wrong] message from unscrupulous 
scientists can be amplified by low-quality journalists. This type of 
situations undermine the role of science in our society (leading to a 
wide-spread skepticism toward the science in the society).


My apology for being a party pooper... :-)


=
[*]
Let me clarify this point for those who might not be familiar with 
how scientific publications work. The author(s) submits a manuscript to 
the editor for publication. The editor takes a look - to determine who 
would be good reviewers, and sends it to those for review.  Based on 
the reviewers' comments and recommendations, the editor makes a decision: 
to publish, to reject, or to give an opportunity to make improvements, in 
which case, the article can go through an additional, similar, round of 
review.
I've refereed many manuscripts. A significant portion of those were not 
suitable for publication without significant revision. Some of the 
manuscripts should have never been published (and usually they weren't).


So, the bottom line is that a peer review is an important tool to weed out 
improper articles. So if an article hasn't passed it, - its results and 
conclusions might not be reliable.

However, it is important to recognize that the peer-review is not a
guarantee. Moreover, there are peer-reviewed publications that are 
wrong. Some of those should not have passed through the peer-review, 
others were found to be wrong by the subsequent studies stimulated by 
them. The latter is a normal scientific discovery process.)


[**] I am not claiming all conclusions are wrong, - but even some of them 
being wrong make the entire article wrong.



Cheers,

Igor



ann sanfedele Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:41:36 -0800 wrote:

great article - works for me regularly

ann


On 1/27/2021 10:03 AM, Bill wrote:


https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/26/health/swearing-benefits-wellness/index.html


It definitely makes me feel better

bill



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.