ZRe: My journey down the slippery slope continues ...

2022-04-08 Thread Paul Stenquist
I too always take two cameras when shooting for a client. Now it’s a K-1 and a 
K-3. I can fit both and about ten lenses in a pelican case, but it’s pretty 
damn heavy. That’s okay when I’m working out of the trunk of a car , which is 
almost always. My list of cameras owned is similar. I still have at least a 
dozen that are functional.

Paul

> On Apr 8, 2022, at 5:54 PM, John Francis  wrote:
> 
> On Apr 7, 2022, at 10:00 AM, Alan C  wrote:
>> 
>> For me, one camera is quite enough.
> 
> I've run into enough situations where one camera isn't enough to always want 
> a backup in my camera bag.
> 
> For one thing I spent a few years earning my ticket into motorsports events 
> by shooting for a website.  That taught me that there are occasions when you 
> don't have time to swap lenses on a camera - you barely have time to switch 
> to the second camera setup.
> 
> For another thing, there are once-in-a-lifetime opportunities where having a 
> second body with you is worth it just for insurance.
> When I got a one-year job assignment in New Zealand one of the items on my 
> shopping list for the stop-off in Singapore on the way from London to 
> Auckland was an ME to sit alongside my MX (plus an M80-200 zoom and a few 
> other goodies).  Ever since then I've almost always had two camera bodies in 
> the bag.
> 
> Then there was the time when the MX Motor Drive bent the coupling in my MX.  
> Fortunately that had become my second body - by that time my primary camera 
> was a PZ-1p.
> 
> And there was the time the PZ-1p stopped working on a rainy race day at 
> Laguna Seca. It was fine when it dried out after a couple of hours, but by 
> then the race was over.  But the trusty old MX filled in just fine.
> 
> Or the time when I slipped climbing down from a photo tower, and knocked 
> (most of) my MZ-S off the back of my big zoom. Again, having the PZ-1p along 
> as well meant I could continue shooting.
> 
> And, of course, in the film days it was nice to have a second body so that 
> you could have two different types of film to hand.
> 
> 
> I don't have anywhere near as many cameras as Godfrey, but I have still got a 
> fair number of the cameras I've used over the years.
> I have owned:
>   Brownie 127
>   Hanimex 35mm
>   Olympus Pen half-frame.
> (I don't have any of those, but I do have my father's Ilford Sportsman 35mm).
>   Spotmatic II (later donated to a friend).
>   MX
>   ME (donated to a different friend)
>   ME Super
>   Super Program
>   PZ-1p
>   MX #2 (black)
>   MZ-S
>   Canon G1
>   Olympus EPL-1
>   *ist-D
>   K10D
>   K-5
>   Olympus OM-D E-M1X :-)
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: My journey down the slippery slope continues ...

2022-04-08 Thread John Francis
On Apr 7, 2022, at 10:00 AM, Alan C  wrote:
> 
> For me, one camera is quite enough.

I've run into enough situations where one camera isn't enough to always want a 
backup in my camera bag.

For one thing I spent a few years earning my ticket into motorsports events by 
shooting for a website.  That taught me that there are occasions when you don't 
have time to swap lenses on a camera - you barely have time to switch to the 
second camera setup.

For another thing, there are once-in-a-lifetime opportunities where having a 
second body with you is worth it just for insurance.
When I got a one-year job assignment in New Zealand one of the items on my 
shopping list for the stop-off in Singapore on the way from London to Auckland 
was an ME to sit alongside my MX (plus an M80-200 zoom and a few other 
goodies).  Ever since then I've almost always had two camera bodies in the bag.

Then there was the time when the MX Motor Drive bent the coupling in my MX.  
Fortunately that had become my second body - by that time my primary camera was 
a PZ-1p.

And there was the time the PZ-1p stopped working on a rainy race day at Laguna 
Seca. It was fine when it dried out after a couple of hours, but by then the 
race was over.  But the trusty old MX filled in just fine.

Or the time when I slipped climbing down from a photo tower, and knocked (most 
of) my MZ-S off the back of my big zoom. Again, having the PZ-1p along as well 
meant I could continue shooting.

And, of course, in the film days it was nice to have a second body so that you 
could have two different types of film to hand.


I don't have anywhere near as many cameras as Godfrey, but I have still got a 
fair number of the cameras I've used over the years.
I have owned:
   Brownie 127
   Hanimex 35mm
   Olympus Pen half-frame.
(I don't have any of those, but I do have my father's Ilford Sportsman 35mm).
   Spotmatic II (later donated to a friend).
   MX
   ME (donated to a different friend)
   ME Super
   Super Program
   PZ-1p
   MX #2 (black)
   MZ-S
   Canon G1
   Olympus EPL-1
   *ist-D
   K10D
   K-5
   Olympus OM-D E-M1X :-)
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.