First: When people don't beliefe any more whats printet or said in
media, they won't pay for it any more.
Second: that's your opinion.
Third: I didn't want to take the position of any party or wing. Take the
example of the US: Do you want all media be like Fox News?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2005 13:03
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Dogmatism: what is allowed?
first, you didn't answer the question: why media wouln't work any more
without that goal?
second, yes, there are two kinds of journalism: the ones that cover the
news no one would pay them to distort (basebal games and flower expos),
and the one that covers the interesting news.
i wouldn't put much faith in *any* party newspaper: cuban russian, US,
UK... and, honestly, i doubt cuba is worse than US in this regard: a lie
is a lie is a lie.
best,
mishka
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:49:45 +0100, Michael Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OK. There's different kind of journalists, or journalism.
The ones that feel htat they want to tell stories, want to show how
the world is. They should have tho goal to be as near at reality as
possible. The you have political journalism (in a wider sense). Those
journalists want to change something, want to be the world a little
bit like they want. That starts at a daily newspaper with a light
political direction and ends at a kampfblatt (propaganda) from either
left or right end of the range. But would you beliefe what's printed
in a cuban party newspaper?
So. It doesnt matter how hard, but in a way, every journalist should
be willing to stay at the trouth. He shoult try.
Michael
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Januar 2005 02:53
An: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Betreff: Re: AW: Dogmatism: what is allowed?
why?
mishka
