Re: Apologize for the Bayonet Takumar typo
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Charles Robinson wrote: > Not an issue in B&W! :-) Good point! (and good shot - captured a peak energy moment!) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Apologize for the Bayonet Takumar typo
On Apr 12, 2012, at 23:17, Walt Gilbert wrote: > On 4/12/2012 11:09 PM, Darren Addy wrote: >> It's been gently pointed out to me that I have a major typo (wasn't he >> in M.A.S.H.?) . I've fired my editor. >> This is the Takumar (Bayonet) 135mm f2.5 that I'm selling for $50 plus >> shipping. People have varying opinions on that lens (some call >> it under-rated) but I can't deny that some people get some great >> images from it (particularly considering it is a $50 lens) >> http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=Bayonet+Takumar+135mm&ss=1&s=int >> http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/Pentax-Takumar-135mm-F2.5-Bayonet-Lens.html >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/cowfish/sets/72157594497791910/ >> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=37701666 >> >> Darren >> > I got this shot with that lens, FWIW: > > http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/4894906307/ > > The biggest issue I've had with it is purple fringing. > Not an issue in B&W! :-) Also shot with the Takumar 2.5 here... http://charles.robinsontwins.org/photos/1982/queen/content/Scan_080526_0023_large.html -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Apologize for the Bayonet Takumar typo
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Darren Addy wrote: > It's been gently pointed out to me that I have a major typo (wasn't he > in M.A.S.H.?) . I've fired my editor. Never notice.:-) Dave > Darren > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Apologize for the Bayonet Takumar typo
On 4/12/2012 11:20 PM, Darren Addy wrote: That's a STUNNER Walt. I'm becoming convinced that there are NO bad lenses. Just lenses used badly. :) Thanks, Darren! The only issue I've ever had with it has been fringing -- but, at the time, I was shooting with the saturation turned up to 11 and almost always wide open. When I settled down a little bit, I started getting MUCH better results from it. -- Walt -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Apologize for the Bayonet Takumar typo
That's a STUNNER Walt. I'm becoming convinced that there are NO bad lenses. Just lenses used badly. :) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Apologize for the Bayonet Takumar typo
On 4/12/2012 11:09 PM, Darren Addy wrote: It's been gently pointed out to me that I have a major typo (wasn't he in M.A.S.H.?) . I've fired my editor. This is the Takumar (Bayonet) 135mm f2.5 that I'm selling for $50 plus shipping. People have varying opinions on that lens (some call it under-rated) but I can't deny that some people get some great images from it (particularly considering it is a $50 lens) http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=Bayonet+Takumar+135mm&ss=1&s=int http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/Pentax-Takumar-135mm-F2.5-Bayonet-Lens.html http://www.flickr.com/photos/cowfish/sets/72157594497791910/ http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=37701666 Darren I got this shot with that lens, FWIW: http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/4894906307/ The biggest issue I've had with it is purple fringing. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Apologize for the Bayonet Takumar typo
It's been gently pointed out to me that I have a major typo (wasn't he in M.A.S.H.?) . I've fired my editor. This is the Takumar (Bayonet) 135mm f2.5 that I'm selling for $50 plus shipping. People have varying opinions on that lens (some call it under-rated) but I can't deny that some people get some great images from it (particularly considering it is a $50 lens) http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=Bayonet+Takumar+135mm&ss=1&s=int http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/Pentax-Takumar-135mm-F2.5-Bayonet-Lens.html http://www.flickr.com/photos/cowfish/sets/72157594497791910/ http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=37701666 Darren -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
