Re[3]: Applied SciFi blooper
Amen, At 11:27 AM 9/4/2002 +0300, you wrote: Mike wrote: MI Q15: What is the image capture resolution? MI A15: Approximately equivalent to 18 Megapixels (2000 x 3000 x 3 channels). MI Digital PIC output is essentially the same as C-41 processed film scanned on a MI high quality DML scanner. They must be taking their retailers for complete idiots. This is a meagre 6 MPixels, 24 bits per pixel. I will certainly not accept to have my film destroyed for as little as this. Servus, Alin
Re: Applied SciFi blooper
Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is interesting - is this in commercial use now? I remember hearing of a techology which could scan film without developing, but destroyed the film in the process - is this the very same? Yes. The very same process was announced a few years ago. -- http://members.chello.nl/~j.schoone\\|// Registered Linux user #78364 - The Linux Counter - http://counter.li.org Assume nothing, expect anything.
Re[3]: Applied SciFi blooper
Mike wrote: MI Q15: What is the image capture resolution? MI A15: Approximately equivalent to 18 Megapixels (2000 x 3000 x 3 channels). MI Digital PIC output is essentially the same as C-41 processed film scanned on a MI high quality DML scanner. They must be taking their retailers for complete idiots. This is a meagre 6 MPixels, 24 bits per pixel. I will certainly not accept to have my film destroyed for as little as this. Servus, Alin
Re: Re[3]: Applied SciFi blooper
Alin Flaider wrote: MI Q15: What is the image capture resolution? MI A15: Approximately equivalent to 18 Megapixels (2000 x 3000 x 3 channels). MI Digital PIC output is essentially the same as C-41 processed film scanned on a MI high quality DML scanner. They must be taking their retailers for complete idiots. This is a meagre 6 MPixels, 24 bits per pixel. I will certainly not accept to have my film destroyed for as little as this. You need to be careful with digicam and printer specs; most marketing people confuse pixels and dots. There's a subtle but very important difference. Cheers, - Dave http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ (out of date)
OT: Applied SciFi blooper
Just spotted one in a CVS dowstairs. Looks like... well, applied scifi. You insert a roll of film, in 10 minutes it develops the negs and then you can print it, you can get the scanned CD. Almost wanted to try it, until... to ensure your privacy, your negatives will be delivered on a CD, and the film will be unusuable and recicled. Ooops... I guess the 1hr lab around the corner will still handle my film for a while. Mishka
RE: Applied SciFi blooper
This is interesting - is this in commercial use now? I remember hearing of a techology which could scan film without developing, but destroyed the film in the process - is this the very same? -Original Message- From: Mike Ignatiev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 September 2002 16:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Applied SciFi blooper Just spotted one in a CVS dowstairs. Looks like... well, applied scifi. You insert a roll of film, in 10 minutes it develops the negs and then you can print it, you can get the scanned CD. Almost wanted to try it, until... to ensure your privacy, your negatives will be delivered on a CD, and the film will be unusuable and recicled. Ooops... I guess the 1hr lab around the corner will still handle my film for a while. Mishka
