RE: Common sense (was: Pentax High End DSLR)
So have I - regularly, no more grain than your average 35mm 20x30 inch print. In fact, I am constantly amazed at how LITTLE difference interpolation seems to make to my images when they are stretched so large. tan. -Original Message- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 14 May 2004 8:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Common sense (was: Pentax High End DSLR) - Original Message - From: "Christian" Subject: Re: Common sense (was: Pentax High End DSLR) > I've done a 20x30 (inches) print from a *ist D pef converted to tiff using > PhotoLab. WOW! That's heartening. William Robb
Re: Common sense (was: Pentax High End DSLR)
- Original Message - From: "Christian" Subject: Re: Common sense (was: Pentax High End DSLR) > I've done a 20x30 (inches) print from a *ist D pef converted to tiff using > PhotoLab. WOW! That's heartening. William Robb
Re: Common sense (was: Pentax High End DSLR)
I've done a 20x30 (inches) print from a *ist D pef converted to tiff using PhotoLab. WOW! Christian - Original Message - From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 5:36 PM Subject: Re: Common sense (was: Pentax High End DSLR) > > - Original Message - > From: "Dario Bonazza" > Subject: Common sense (was: Pentax High End DSLR) > > > > > > > Should you want to just print up to A4 size prints, a 4Mpix digicam > is more > > than enough, hence don't worry about DSLR, interchangeable lenses, > RAW > > shooting, portable hard disks, terabytes of memory cards and so on. > Some > > more common sense, I suppose. > > > > However, we were supposed talking about getting the pro results one > could > > expect (and usually gets) from a DSLR, weren't we? > > > > I have printed as large as 12x18 inches (gotta be around 30x40cm) > from istD files, shot RAW and converted using the Pentax software. > No problems visible in the prints, and the paying customers were very > happy with the work as well. > > Pro results from a DSLR? > You betcha. > > William Robb > >
Re: Common sense (was: Pentax High End DSLR)
- Original Message - From: "Dario Bonazza" Subject: Common sense (was: Pentax High End DSLR) > > Should you want to just print up to A4 size prints, a 4Mpix digicam is more > than enough, hence don't worry about DSLR, interchangeable lenses, RAW > shooting, portable hard disks, terabytes of memory cards and so on. Some > more common sense, I suppose. > > However, we were supposed talking about getting the pro results one could > expect (and usually gets) from a DSLR, weren't we? > I have printed as large as 12x18 inches (gotta be around 30x40cm) from istD files, shot RAW and converted using the Pentax software. No problems visible in the prints, and the paying customers were very happy with the work as well. Pro results from a DSLR? You betcha. William Robb
Common sense (was: Pentax High End DSLR)
In their wisdom, William Robb & Co. wrote: > >>The Adobe RAW converter seems to work well. > >>The Pentax RAW converter works just fine, presuming that you are > >>making prints, rather than looking at your images as 4x6 foot murals > >>on a computer screen. > >>My friend with the Canon Digital Rebel sez this complaint comes up > >>all the time on the forums he is on. > >>The bottom line seems to be that the prints come out fine, no matter > >>what artifacts show up on the mural sized screen views. > >>For myself, I shoot to make pictures, not to find problems with the > >>equipment. > > > >Quite. Thanks for posting some common sense here :) > > I'll second that. Should you want to just print up to A4 size prints, a 4Mpix digicam is more than enough, hence don't worry about DSLR, interchangeable lenses, RAW shooting, portable hard disks, terabytes of memory cards and so on. Some more common sense, I suppose. However, we were supposed talking about getting the pro results one could expect (and usually gets) from a DSLR, weren't we? Dario
