Compare 18-55 vs 16-45?

2005-03-21 Thread Dave Kennedy
I've read alot of comments/recommendations to go to the 16-45 rather
than the 18-55 over the past few months.

Has anyone actually done a side-by-side comparison of the 2 lenses? I
currently have the kit 18-55 lens with my DS, but I'm wondering what
I'm missing (other than the obvious width), by not having the 16-45.
Is is worth going out and spending the cash to upgrade?

thanx

dk



Re: Compare 18-55 vs 16-45?

2005-03-21 Thread Dario Bonazza
Hi Dave,
You wrote:
Has anyone actually done a side-by-side comparison of the 2 lenses? I
currently have the kit 18-55 lens with my DS, but I'm wondering what
I'm missing (other than the obvious width), by not having the 16-45.
You're mainly missing the obvious width and something at edges (when stopped 
down).

Is is worth going out and spending the cash to upgrade?
Compare by yourself and then decide:
DA 18-55 @ 18mm f/4:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0103.JPG
DA 16-45 @ 18mm f/4:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0112.JPG
DA 18-55 @ 18mm f/8:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0105.JPG
DA 16-45 @ 18mm f/8:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0114.JPG
DA 18-55 @ 45mm f/4:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0106.JPG
DA 16-45 @ 45mm f/4:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0109.JPG
DA 18-55 @ 45mm f/8:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0108.JPG
DA 16-45 @ 45mm f/8:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0111.JPG
Cheers,
Dario
www.dariobonazza.com



Re: Compare 18-55 vs 16-45?

2005-03-21 Thread Dave Kennedy
Excellent, Thank you Dario, that is exactly what I was looking for. 

Thanks again.

DaveK


On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:14:14 +0100, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Dave,
 
 You wrote:
 
  Has anyone actually done a side-by-side comparison of the 2 lenses? I
  currently have the kit 18-55 lens with my DS, but I'm wondering what
  I'm missing (other than the obvious width), by not having the 16-45.
 
 You're mainly missing the obvious width and something at edges (when stopped
 down).
 
  Is is worth going out and spending the cash to upgrade?
 
 Compare by yourself and then decide:
 
 DA 18-55 @ 18mm f/4:
 http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0103.JPG
 
 DA 16-45 @ 18mm f/4:
 http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0112.JPG
 
 DA 18-55 @ 18mm f/8:
 http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0105.JPG
 
 DA 16-45 @ 18mm f/8:
 http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0114.JPG
 
 DA 18-55 @ 45mm f/4:
 http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0106.JPG
 
 DA 16-45 @ 45mm f/4:
 http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0109.JPG
 
 DA 18-55 @ 45mm f/8:
 http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0108.JPG
 
 DA 16-45 @ 45mm f/8:
 http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0111.JPG
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dario
 www.dariobonazza.com
 




Re: Compare 18-55 vs 16-45?

2005-03-21 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
My comparison is based on what I see through the viewfinder when I fit 
the two lenses in succession. I do not own the 18-55.

The DA18-55/3.5-5.6 always appears lower in contrast and darker then 
the DA16-45/4. The 16-45 is easier to focus manually, even at 16mm 
focal length.

Godfrey



Re: Compare 18-55 vs 16-45?

2005-03-21 Thread Powell Hargrave
Thanks Dario.

I will not be rushing out to get the superior, but not that much, 16-45.
If I can afford it the DA 12-24mm will be finding a happy home here.

The 18-55 has more CR at 18mm which is easy to correct in CS-RAW.  This
improves the sharpness a bit too.  The slight barrel distortion at 18mm can
also be corrected easily.

Why are your 18-55 images so unsharp on the right side at 45mm?  They seem
almost as sharp as the 16-45 on the left side.  I do not see this with my lens.

And what's the big deal of fixed aperture zoom?  OK it is nice if using
manual exposure but how often do we do that?  The 18-55 is faster at
18-20mm, f4 to 35mm and only drop from f4.5 to f5.6 at 50mm.  So there is
no speed advantage for the 16-45.

I like the nice light well built little plastic lens.  It fits well with
the little DS and I have some primes when that a little better resolution
is more important than the versatility.

Powell


 Has anyone actually done a side-by-side comparison of the 2 lenses? I
 currently have the kit 18-55 lens with my DS, but I'm wondering what
 I'm missing (other than the obvious width), by not having the 16-45.

You're mainly missing the obvious width and something at edges (when stopped 
down).

 Is is worth going out and spending the cash to upgrade?

Compare by yourself and then decide:

DA 18-55 @ 18mm f/4:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0103.JPG

DA 16-45 @ 18mm f/4:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0112.JPG

DA 18-55 @ 18mm f/8:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0105.JPG

DA 16-45 @ 18mm f/8:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0114.JPG

DA 18-55 @ 45mm f/4:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0106.JPG

DA 16-45 @ 45mm f/4:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0109.JPG

DA 18-55 @ 45mm f/8:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0108.JPG

DA 16-45 @ 45mm f/8:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/IMGP0111.JPG

Cheers,

Dario
www.dariobonazza.com