Re: Comparison: 77 on 35 vs. 50 on APS sensor

2004-05-20 Thread Alan Chan
They should print that in magazine ads instead of some silly ads which went 
nowhere. 

Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Above statement is apparently quite true (of course, as it has come from 
one
of our prime lens gurus :-), and reminded me of some interesting exchanges
between Pentax QC Dep't and lens Design Dep't (it showed up in certain lens
forum).
It went something like this.

Pentax QC Dep't (Hereinafter QC): The 50/1.4 has slight flare (CA, not due
to backlight) at max aperture, and might not be suitable for use with 
*istD.

Lens designers (hereinafter LD) : The lens was deliberately designed so (I
assume the same design principle with LTD lenses).
QC: It's an excuse that cannot be accepted in the digital era. A programme
line which does not use max aperture must be designed.
LD: OK then, we can easily prototype the same 50/1.4 but with less flare
(CA). This could be the future FA*50/1.4
Proto was produced.
QC: Good, still some CA remaining but it is now less than 50%. Let's test 
it
for chart, general scenery and night scene etc.
Test results were satisfactory.  Design improvement was well reflected.
Might have to change to the new design.

And some time later
QC: We have closely evaluated the results of the test.  Well, the current
one shows much better gradation and produces much subtler impression.  We
much prefer the current one.
LD: We told you so.  Now we are vindicated.  We are not pursuing just the
crispness, and that differentiates our lenses from others.  Got it?
Well, if we would proceed with the new version of 50/1.4, the current 
50/1.4
might fetch a premium price, just like A*85/1.4.

Above is a true story.  It tells the present design philosophy of Pentax
lenses well.  For example, if they ever wish to produce Nikkor type lenses
(often too crisp), they can easily do so, but they chose not to.  That's 
why
there are so many Pentax lens enthusiasts.  Limited lenses are true Pentax
ones, producing excellent 3D effect in a compact package.

Well, folks, if you do not have an FA50/1.4 yet, secure it now before it
becomes one of the legendary lenses :-).
_
MSN Premium with Virus Guard and Firewall* from McAfee® Security : 2 months 
FREE*   
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines



Re: Comparison: 77 on 35 vs. 50 on APS sensor

2004-05-21 Thread Mark Roberts
KT Takeshita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Well, folks, if you do not have an FA50/1.4 yet, secure it now before it
>becomes one of the legendary lenses :-).

What he said.
:)

-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com



Re: Comparison: 77 on 35 vs. 50 on APS sensor

2004-05-22 Thread Steve Desjardins
Of course, the 1.4 or 1.7 50's can also be had for far less that the
77.