Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2016-01-24 Thread Bob W-PDML 
Christmas is Noel. Collin is two Ls...

> On 24 Jan 2016, at 20:15, Rick Womer  wrote:
> 
> Colin, off-list messages to you are bouncing:
> 
> The error that the other server returned was:
> 550 5.0.0 ... User unknown
> 
> Rick
> http://photo.net/photos/RickW
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Mail Delivery Subsystem
>  wrote:
>> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>> 
>> col...@brendemuehl.net
>> 
>> Technical details of permanent failure:
>> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for 
>> the recipient domain brendemuehl.net by 
>> inbound.brendemuehl.net.netsolmail.net. [206.188.198.64].
>> 
>> The error that the other server returned was:
>> 550 5.0.0 ... User unknown
>> 
>> 
>> - Original message -
>> 
>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>>d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
>>h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
>> :content-type;
>>bh=3EH47POmBHqVy1B/AhkFta0upUUSnBMvxMESa3Wv1Gs=;
>>b=GxfaFZqkHeCKgSFiF19yEqof9yFKDd9kTBhDjnXd3C25Oz2aidjiOFy/U+C544KbGn
>> DzSkxGmipIrVAmxHcsPYQfTDntBG+TD/4Mhcu9Hv7BNJfSqjhxTcgXXxynFdOGUdjdUK
>> PJ07buy5haBCKyniUCqrTKOOgGJmmW/4n0Es/9dPPCHB9fF5pkAvG9t62Pzxgw3bDL1y
>> MwkB9FJQ+am6rfgcqa0sBWYiZGzMZSDdafS1bLUlj8/oSu7TU4WeVKygKujE1ET23HFD
>> 9O+7uTjVeLpumx0RHvqAFBkJm07KJ4oWbrIdZmX7chwqtbe9/KXOILHBjAPBP7yf4+lf
>> WHzA==
>> X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>>d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
>>h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
>> :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
>>bh=3EH47POmBHqVy1B/AhkFta0upUUSnBMvxMESa3Wv1Gs=;
>>b=A6oc//gE48nlmP8YFSD6uLB2CvmtRXmmqO+OFgOQXNlIba1ZpQkZ83m3PXLxI+wdM9
>> 7vy0/Y3JlDNGP79VXmN7v2mXyJ0Pcv7kftwJIzPXVcOakEdxQxLWGUcm8wjhVPWhKeRw
>> CrWtM/VYTJ4twTj5mENfUH957i1JIHM/YByj+91BAxEPhUPIv3vGY6IGln6yaQswZe7h
>> 4byKMA9Cmzc09iyG9dN317oRfE5vmFoqUHri/1hr+c3WMY2nBphAK7QYb2y6Op5uqwN1
>> IHDsWU5qQIx8PxC4EYrZS383sikfHl4le4jW0pV9kB6HXCC3W8dciUqgsNtvWI/ts6tM
>> MpRA==
>> X-Gm-Message-State: 
>> AG10YOTPhBYPF6KzDDMdMBLHI/xBVU4PxMaWeNwPxwyzJvVGlumLZRSgnPNifiA9VkD8aPELeYjeTHwWCNPgVQ==
>> X-Received: by 10.50.152.41 with SMTP id uv9mr14092934igb.3.1453661619026;
>> Sun, 24 Jan 2016 10:53:39 -0800 (PST)
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Received: by 10.79.129.199 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 10:53:09 -0800 (PST)
>> In-Reply-To: <001801d15614$6c7b2740$457175c0$@brendemuehl.net>
>> References: <001801d15614$6c7b2740$457175c0$@brendemuehl.net>
>> From: Rick Womer 
>> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:53:09 -0500
>> Message-ID: 
>>

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2016-01-24 Thread Darren Addy 
Bob is correct: the right address is coll...@brendemuehl.net

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
> Christmas is Noel. Collin is two Ls...
>
>> On 24 Jan 2016, at 20:15, Rick Womer  wrote:
>>
>> Colin, off-list messages to you are bouncing:
>>
>> The error that the other server returned was:
>> 550 5.0.0 ... User unknown
>>
>> Rick
>> http://photo.net/photos/RickW
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Mail Delivery Subsystem
>>  wrote:
>>> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>>>
>>> col...@brendemuehl.net
>>>
>>> Technical details of permanent failure:
>>> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for 
>>> the recipient domain brendemuehl.net by 
>>> inbound.brendemuehl.net.netsolmail.net. [206.188.198.64].
>>>
>>> The error that the other server returned was:
>>> 550 5.0.0 ... User unknown
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original message -
>>>
>>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>>>d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
>>>h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
>>> :content-type;
>>>bh=3EH47POmBHqVy1B/AhkFta0upUUSnBMvxMESa3Wv1Gs=;
>>>b=GxfaFZqkHeCKgSFiF19yEqof9yFKDd9kTBhDjnXd3C25Oz2aidjiOFy/U+C544KbGn
>>> DzSkxGmipIrVAmxHcsPYQfTDntBG+TD/4Mhcu9Hv7BNJfSqjhxTcgXXxynFdOGUdjdUK
>>> PJ07buy5haBCKyniUCqrTKOOgGJmmW/4n0Es/9dPPCHB9fF5pkAvG9t62Pzxgw3bDL1y
>>> MwkB9FJQ+am6rfgcqa0sBWYiZGzMZSDdafS1bLUlj8/oSu7TU4WeVKygKujE1ET23HFD
>>> 9O+7uTjVeLpumx0RHvqAFBkJm07KJ4oWbrIdZmX7chwqtbe9/KXOILHBjAPBP7yf4+lf
>>> WHzA==
>>> X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
>>>d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
>>>h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
>>> :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
>>>bh=3EH47POmBHqVy1B/AhkFta0upUUSnBMvxMESa3Wv1Gs=;
>>>b=A6oc//gE48nlmP8YFSD6uLB2CvmtRXmmqO+OFgOQXNlIba1ZpQkZ83m3PXLxI+wdM9
>>> 7vy0/Y3JlDNGP79VXmN7v2mXyJ0Pcv7kftwJIzPXVcOakEdxQxLWGUcm8wjhVPWhKeRw
>>> CrWtM/VYTJ4twTj5mENfUH957i1JIHM/YByj+91BAxEPhUPIv3vGY6IGln6yaQswZe7h
>>> 4byKMA9Cmzc09iyG9dN317oRfE5vmFoqUHri/1hr+c3WMY2nBphAK7QYb2y6Op5uqwN1
>>> IHDsWU5qQIx8PxC4EYrZS383sikfHl4le4jW0pV9kB6HXCC3W8dciUqgsNtvWI/ts6tM
>>> MpRA==
>>> X-Gm-Message-State: 
>>> AG10YOTPhBYPF6KzDDMdMBLHI/xBVU4PxMaWeNwPxwyzJvVGlumLZRSgnPNifiA9VkD8aPELeYjeTHwWCNPgVQ==
>>> X-Received: by 10.50.152.41 with SMTP id uv9mr14092934igb.3.1453661619026;
>>> Sun, 24 Jan 2016 10:53:39 -0800 (PST)
>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>> Received: by 10.79.129.199 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 10:53:09 -0800 (PST)
>>> In-Reply-To: <001801d15614$6c7b2740$457175c0$@brendemuehl.net>
>>> References: <001801d15614$6c7b2740$457175c0$@brendemuehl.net>
>>> From: Rick Womer 
>>> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:53:09 -0500
>>> Message-ID: 
>>>

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2016-01-24 Thread Rick Womer 
Colin, off-list messages to you are bouncing:

The error that the other server returned was:
550 5.0.0 ... User unknown

Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW


On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Mail Delivery Subsystem
 wrote:
> Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
>  col...@brendemuehl.net
>
> Technical details of permanent failure:
> Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for 
> the recipient domain brendemuehl.net by 
> inbound.brendemuehl.net.netsolmail.net. [206.188.198.64].
>
> The error that the other server returned was:
> 550 5.0.0 ... User unknown
>
>
> - Original message -
>
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
> d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
> h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
>  :content-type;
> bh=3EH47POmBHqVy1B/AhkFta0upUUSnBMvxMESa3Wv1Gs=;
> b=GxfaFZqkHeCKgSFiF19yEqof9yFKDd9kTBhDjnXd3C25Oz2aidjiOFy/U+C544KbGn
>  DzSkxGmipIrVAmxHcsPYQfTDntBG+TD/4Mhcu9Hv7BNJfSqjhxTcgXXxynFdOGUdjdUK
>  PJ07buy5haBCKyniUCqrTKOOgGJmmW/4n0Es/9dPPCHB9fF5pkAvG9t62Pzxgw3bDL1y
>  MwkB9FJQ+am6rfgcqa0sBWYiZGzMZSDdafS1bLUlj8/oSu7TU4WeVKygKujE1ET23HFD
>  9O+7uTjVeLpumx0RHvqAFBkJm07KJ4oWbrIdZmX7chwqtbe9/KXOILHBjAPBP7yf4+lf
>  WHzA==
> X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
> d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
> h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
>  :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
> bh=3EH47POmBHqVy1B/AhkFta0upUUSnBMvxMESa3Wv1Gs=;
> b=A6oc//gE48nlmP8YFSD6uLB2CvmtRXmmqO+OFgOQXNlIba1ZpQkZ83m3PXLxI+wdM9
>  7vy0/Y3JlDNGP79VXmN7v2mXyJ0Pcv7kftwJIzPXVcOakEdxQxLWGUcm8wjhVPWhKeRw
>  CrWtM/VYTJ4twTj5mENfUH957i1JIHM/YByj+91BAxEPhUPIv3vGY6IGln6yaQswZe7h
>  4byKMA9Cmzc09iyG9dN317oRfE5vmFoqUHri/1hr+c3WMY2nBphAK7QYb2y6Op5uqwN1
>  IHDsWU5qQIx8PxC4EYrZS383sikfHl4le4jW0pV9kB6HXCC3W8dciUqgsNtvWI/ts6tM
>  MpRA==
> X-Gm-Message-State: 
> AG10YOTPhBYPF6KzDDMdMBLHI/xBVU4PxMaWeNwPxwyzJvVGlumLZRSgnPNifiA9VkD8aPELeYjeTHwWCNPgVQ==
> X-Received: by 10.50.152.41 with SMTP id uv9mr14092934igb.3.1453661619026;
>  Sun, 24 Jan 2016 10:53:39 -0800 (PST)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Received: by 10.79.129.199 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 10:53:09 -0800 (PST)
> In-Reply-To: <001801d15614$6c7b2740$457175c0$@brendemuehl.net>
> References: <001801d15614$6c7b2740$457175c0$@brendemuehl.net>
> From: Rick Womer 
> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:53:09 -0500
> Message-ID: 
>

Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2016-01-24 Thread Rick Womer 
Thanks, gents. Contact established.

On Jan 24, 2016, at 3:46 PM, Darren Addy wrote:

> Bob is correct: the right address is coll...@brendemuehl.net
> 
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Bob W-PDML  wrote:
>> Christmas is Noel. Collin is two Ls...
>> 
>>> On 24 Jan 2016, at 20:15, Rick Womer  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Colin, off-list messages to you are bouncing:
>>> 
>>> The error that the other server returned was:
>>> 550 5.0.0 ... User unknown
>>> 
>>> Rick
>>> http://photo.net/photos/RickW
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Mail Delivery Subsystem
>>>  wrote:
 Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
 
col...@brendemuehl.net
 
 Technical details of permanent failure:
 Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server 
 for the recipient domain brendemuehl.net by 
 inbound.brendemuehl.net.netsolmail.net. [206.188.198.64].
 
 The error that the other server returned was:
 550 5.0.0 ... User unknown
 
 
 - Original message -
 
 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
   d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
   h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-type;
   bh=3EH47POmBHqVy1B/AhkFta0upUUSnBMvxMESa3Wv1Gs=;
   b=GxfaFZqkHeCKgSFiF19yEqof9yFKDd9kTBhDjnXd3C25Oz2aidjiOFy/U+C544KbGn
DzSkxGmipIrVAmxHcsPYQfTDntBG+TD/4Mhcu9Hv7BNJfSqjhxTcgXXxynFdOGUdjdUK
PJ07buy5haBCKyniUCqrTKOOgGJmmW/4n0Es/9dPPCHB9fF5pkAvG9t62Pzxgw3bDL1y
MwkB9FJQ+am6rfgcqa0sBWYiZGzMZSDdafS1bLUlj8/oSu7TU4WeVKygKujE1ET23HFD
9O+7uTjVeLpumx0RHvqAFBkJm07KJ4oWbrIdZmX7chwqtbe9/KXOILHBjAPBP7yf4+lf
WHzA==
 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
   d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
   h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
   bh=3EH47POmBHqVy1B/AhkFta0upUUSnBMvxMESa3Wv1Gs=;
   b=A6oc//gE48nlmP8YFSD6uLB2CvmtRXmmqO+OFgOQXNlIba1ZpQkZ83m3PXLxI+wdM9
7vy0/Y3JlDNGP79VXmN7v2mXyJ0Pcv7kftwJIzPXVcOakEdxQxLWGUcm8wjhVPWhKeRw
CrWtM/VYTJ4twTj5mENfUH957i1JIHM/YByj+91BAxEPhUPIv3vGY6IGln6yaQswZe7h
4byKMA9Cmzc09iyG9dN317oRfE5vmFoqUHri/1hr+c3WMY2nBphAK7QYb2y6Op5uqwN1
IHDsWU5qQIx8PxC4EYrZS383sikfHl4le4jW0pV9kB6HXCC3W8dciUqgsNtvWI/ts6tM
MpRA==
 X-Gm-Message-State: 
 AG10YOTPhBYPF6KzDDMdMBLHI/xBVU4PxMaWeNwPxwyzJvVGlumLZRSgnPNifiA9VkD8aPELeYjeTHwWCNPgVQ==
 X-Received: by 10.50.152.41 with SMTP id uv9mr14092934igb.3.1453661619026;
 Sun, 24 Jan 2016 10:53:39 -0800 (PST)
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Received: by 10.79.129.199 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 10:53:09 -0800 (PST)
 In-Reply-To: <001801d15614$6c7b2740$457175c0$@brendemuehl.net>
 References: <001801d15614$6c7b2740$457175c0$@brendemuehl.net>
 From: Rick Womer 
 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:53:09 -0500
 Message-ID:

Re: Delivery status notification

2014-10-09 Thread Jack Davis 
Anyone else receiving such notices?

Jack

- Original Message -
From: Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@comcast.net
To: Davis, Jack jdavi...@comcast.net
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:05:41 AM
Subject: Delivery status notification

  This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.  

Delivery to the following recipients was aborted after 1 second(s):

  * pdml@pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Delivery status notification

2014-10-09 Thread Stanley Halpin 
I haven’t seen it…

On Oct 9, 2014, at 10:27 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net wrote:

 Anyone else receiving such notices?
 
 Jack
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@comcast.net
 To: Davis, Jack jdavi...@comcast.net
 Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:05:41 AM
 Subject: Delivery status notification
 
  This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.  
 
 Delivery to the following recipients was aborted after 1 second(s):
 
  * pdml@pdml.net
 
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Delivery status notification

2014-10-09 Thread Jack Davis 
Thanks, Stan.

Jack

- Original Message -
From: Halpin, Stan s...@stans-photography.info
To: PDML pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:59:03 AM
Subject: Re: Delivery status notification

I haven’t seen it…

On Oct 9, 2014, at 10:27 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net wrote:

 Anyone else receiving such notices?
 
 Jack
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@comcast.net
 To: Davis, Jack jdavi...@comcast.net
 Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:05:41 AM
 Subject: Delivery status notification
 
  This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.  
 
 Delivery to the following recipients was aborted after 1 second(s):
 
  * pdml@pdml.net
 
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Delivery status notification

2014-10-09 Thread Bob Sullivan 
No Jack, and I just commented on Alan's photo as a test.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net wrote:
 Anyone else receiving such notices?

 Jack

 - Original Message -
 From: Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@comcast.net
 To: Davis, Jack jdavi...@comcast.net
 Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:05:41 AM
 Subject: Delivery status notification

   This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

 Delivery to the following recipients was aborted after 1 second(s):

   * pdml@pdml.net



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Delivery status notification

2014-10-09 Thread Jack Davis 


- Original Message -
From: Davis, Jack jdavi...@comcast.net
To: PDML pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 8:03:49 AM
Subject: Re: Delivery status notification

Thanks, Stan.

Jack

- Original Message -
From: Halpin, Stan s...@stans-photography.info
To: PDML pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:59:03 AM
Subject: Re: Delivery status notification

I haven’t seen it…

On Oct 9, 2014, at 10:27 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net wrote:

 Anyone else receiving such notices?
 
 Jack
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@comcast.net
 To: Davis, Jack jdavi...@comcast.net
 Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:05:41 AM
 Subject: Delivery status notification
 
  This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.  
 
 Delivery to the following recipients was aborted after 1 second(s):
 
  * pdml@pdml.net
 
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Delivery status notification

2014-10-09 Thread Jack Davis 
Thanks, Bob!

Jack

- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
To: PDML pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 8:11:20 AM
Subject: Re: Delivery status notification

No Jack, and I just commented on Alan's photo as a test.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@comcast.net wrote:
 Anyone else receiving such notices?

 Jack

 - Original Message -
 From: Mail Delivery System mailer-dae...@comcast.net
 To: Davis, Jack jdavi...@comcast.net
 Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 7:05:41 AM
 Subject: Delivery status notification

   This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

 Delivery to the following recipients was aborted after 1 second(s):

   * pdml@pdml.net



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2006-02-02 Thread Bob Shell 
Who the hell is studio griffanti, and why is mail to this list going  
to them???


Bob

Begin forwarded message:


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: February 2, 2006 6:50:02 PM EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Delivery to the following recipients failed.

   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reporting-MTA: dns;srvnovara01.studiogriffanti.interno
Received-From-MTA: dns;srvnovara01
Arrival-Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 00:50:01 +0100

Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1

Resent-From: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: February 2, 2006 6:33:38 PM EST
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Another nude
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net



On Feb 2, 2006, at 6:04 PM, Pat White wrote:

Hmm, donut...  When I'm working with models, I offer them soft  
drinks and leave out bowls of almonds, regular and chocolate  
covered.  After all, they need energy to replace the heat lost  
while working nude.  I rarely see the model snacking, but the  
chocolate-covered almonds seem to evaporate.  Now I call them  
model food.



I keep bottled water and string cheese sticks.  That's what models  
have asked for recently.  I used to keep a big jar of malted milk  
balls, but a couple years ago those fell out of favor.  Maybe I  
should try the chocolate almonds.


Bob

RE: Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

2006-02-02 Thread Shel Belinkoff 
http://www.job-net.it/pg/offerta.job-net?14767

Shel



 [Original Message]
 From: Bob Shell 

 Who the hell is studio griffanti, and why is mail to this list going  
 to them???