Re: Human Eye Resolution

2001-04-18 Thread aimcompute

That was interesting...

I am not sure I would agree with the last statement however...

"Also, since it is basically one step from taking the picture to downloading
it onto your computer, you get
better results than if you took a picture, developed it, and then scanned it
in...".

That, I think,  would depend on the type of and resolution of your scanner.

Tom C.

- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Geilenkirchen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 10:21 PM
Subject: Human Eye Resolution


 I found some real interesting info in the article located at the hyperlink
 below.  This might be of some interest to you digital photographers out
 there.

 http://146.139.100.40/webpages/askasci/comp99/cs041.htm

 Jeff

 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Human Eye Resolution

2001-04-17 Thread Jeff Geilenkirchen

I found some real interesting info in the article located at the hyperlink
below.  This might be of some interest to you digital photographers out
there.

http://146.139.100.40/webpages/askasci/comp99/cs041.htm

Jeff

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .