Re: Interior lense dust/dirt

2002-01-10 Thread Shel Belinkoff

One other thing to consider is that what passes for a large speck of
dust or debris may, in fact, be very, very small.  I've removed the
front element group from several lenses in order to remove some large
particles of debris, only to find them to be a lot smaller than they
appeared. The lens clearly magnifies these particles, so, in most cases,
I wouldn't worry about it much, although I used to.

Here's a little test anyone can do that will show how little, if at all,
these particles affect the final image.  Grab your camera and the lens
of your choice, except for super wides, and get thee to a chain link
fence, or even a window or a door screen. Put the lens right up against
a link, or up against the screen, and observe how little the image on
the focusing screen is degraded.  I'll bet in many instances you won't
even be able to notice any degradation, especially with a 50mm lens or
greater. 

Rob Studdert wrote:
> 
> On 10 Jan 2002 at 11:18, Mike Gezing wrote:
> 
> > After looking at all my lenses in
> > this manner I found that particles of dirt were more prevalent in zoom
> > lenses vs primes and appeared to a greater degree in size and number in
> > older lenses vs new. In fact my three newest lenses all primes were clean.
> >
> > Has anyone one read any material on this matter or done any testing to see
> > if this is a real problem. Again I was not seeing dust but what appeared to be
> > small flects of paint.

> If you have to use a halide light at a curious angle in order to see them isn't
> probably not that big a deal. If however there are big noticeable chunks (often
> flaked paint or the product of wear in older lenses) then maybe it should be
> cleaned. However there really needs to be a lot of junk in a lens for it to
> make a visible difference.

-- 
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Interior lense dust/dirt

2002-01-10 Thread Rob Studdert

On 10 Jan 2002 at 11:18, Mike Gezing wrote:

> After looking at all my lenses in
> this manner I found that particles of dirt were more prevalent in zoom
> lenses vs primes and appeared to a greater degree in size and number in
> older lenses vs new. In fact my three newest lenses all primes were clean.
> 
> Has anyone one read any material on this matter or done any testing to see
> if this is a real problem. Again I was not seeing dust but what appeared to be
> small flects of paint.

Hi Mike,

Zoom lenses collect more dust over time since as the lens is zoomed it's 
displacement changes hence air has to rush in to fill the new space, prime 
lenses are far less problematic in this instance and some IF lenses don't 
change their displacement during focussing at all. Many lenses including 
expensive Leica glass have dust in them on initial delivery, mostly it's not a 
problem. 

If you have to use a halide light at a curious angle in order to see them isn't 
probably not that big a deal. If however there are big noticeable chunks (often 
flaked paint or the product of wear in older lenses) then maybe it should be 
cleaned. However there really needs to be a lot of junk in a lens for it to 
make a visible difference.

Cheers,
 Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Interior lense dust/dirt

2002-01-10 Thread David Brooks

I have begun to notice these fine speck of"paint"
on my 35-80 4.5/5.6 but not some much on my main lens
the 80-200.

Dave
 Begin Original Message 

From: Mike Gezing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Again I was not seeing dust but what appeared to
>be small flects of paint.

>Regards,  Mike
-



Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada

Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail 
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .