On 15/09/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was over at the Adobe U2U DNG forum and came across this small thread:
http://tinyurl.com/lgy9o
http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@.3bc19bc8/0
Some of the comments brought a smile to my face, It's no big deal, just
points out what a few people think about the camera and Pentax in general
You might enjoy the diversion ;-))
Yes, interesting observations, I think that it shouldn't be too long
until the other manufacturers come on line and offer DNG, it's just
gaining too much momentum to ignore. I applaud Pentax for being so
forward on its thinking in this matter though they had little choice
if they wanted to start featuring as a viable choice given that PEF is
one of the least well supported RAW formats in third party imaging
software.
What I would like to see eventually is the dropping of the RAW term
and the wider adoption of DNG which should be promoted as the digital
negative, I think then lots more people would be able to identify with
RAW and its position as a un-processed file type.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
