Re: Lenses stolen

2007-01-25 Thread Cotty
Here's a happy way to close a thread. Bo-Ming has surfaced and posts
this on a different list. It's all been sorted.



I am Bo-Ming. 
I just spoke with mehrdad over the phone. It was a
very
nice chat, we talked about computer stuff and our life
stories and stuff like that. It was all a huge
misunderstanding. We have decided that the best thing
to do is to finish the conversions and report the
results to you all.

Let me take this opportunity to apologize to mehrdad
for
not responding to his emails sooner. (Lack of
communication is my fault - there is no question about
that part.)

I already admitted to the fact that I have a
weaknesses
on customer service. In addition to working on that, I
would rather spend 100
hours to do the product right, than to produce a
dubious
product and then spend one hour each on supporting
100
customers. That, of course, does not mean my product
is
so perfect that no support is required, but it is the
same 80/20 rule everywhere: 20% of the time was spent
to
make something apparently work. 80% of the time was
spent
to turn it into a real tool instead of a toy. When it
becomes a real tool, it mostly supports itself.

You hear about all the issues about mount adaptations:
loose mounts, infinity focus, mirror clearance,
improper
exposure. A time consuming task to adapt a lens, and
in
many people's eyes not worth the trouble given the
amount
of tinkering and experimentation required. I have
always
fought this uphill publicity battle that potential
customers keep on asking if my product will suffer the
same fate as the manual focus adaptations. But, those
who
have received lenses that I converted will tell you
that
they are plug and play, and I know of a photographer
who
has used it professionally in an extreme environment.
It
is a real tool - that's what I am trying to create.

Having a choice is always better than having no
choice,
that is hard to argue. A Contax N owner may now choose
between buying a 6MP N Digital or switching to Canon
5D.
Have you ever dreamed of a system switch like this
before? (probably not if you have brand allegiance)
This kind of system choice is not possible until now.
A
Canon user may not choose Zeiss, but the choice is
there, and choice is good. 




-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Lenses stolen

2007-01-24 Thread Cotty
From another list:

Cheers,
  Cotty




I am forwarding this post from the Contax list at the request of the 
original poster who is not a member here.

Meherdad is a member of the LUG and CVUG too, and is trying to recover his 
lenses.


I am sad to announce that after much anticipation of wanting to
convert my contax N lenses to the EOS mount via the guy in Canada, i
rushed and sent him all of my lenses and it appears that he has walked
way with my lenses. he is not returning any of my emails. i tracked
him down via an ebay auction and he is there and responds to emails,
as soon as i introduced myself, i got the silent treatment.


I got an email from him that he is going to be in the us at the
following address

Bo-Ming Tong
145 Tyee Drive
Point Roberts, WA 98281

and that i can ship my lenses, so i did and i have proof that the
lenses got there. i plan to pursue this via the US courts going after
the addressee above and also see what can i do in Vancouver where he
lives

Coneos Imaging Corporation
2733 Chandlery Place, #708
Vancouver, BC V5S 4V3
Canada

meanwhile be on the look out for these lenses on ebay and other sites

here are the list of my lenses that are now stolen

Lens  Serial No Accessories
100 makro N 15071731 Caps and filter (generic front cap)
85mm 1.4   15148045 Caps and filter
70-300mm 12682351 Caps and filter (generic front cap)
24-85mm   12703094 Caps and filter
24-85mm   12699055 Caps and filter (generic front cap)
17-35mm 2.8 15129935 Caps and filter




  -
  regards, mehrdad



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Lenses stolen

2007-01-24 Thread mike wilson

 
 From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Bo-Ming Tong

Odd.  That guy is a well-respected member of a number of lists/forums.


-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software 
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Lenses stolen

2007-01-24 Thread Doug Brewer
mike wilson wrote:
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
Bo-Ming Tong
 
 
 Odd.  That guy is a well-respected member of a number of lists/forums.

Yeah, he produced the first real Pentax FAQ, back in the day, and I am 
pretty sure he hung out here for a while.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Lenses stolen

2007-01-24 Thread mike wilson

 
 From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2007/01/24 Wed PM 01:31:01 GMT
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
 Subject: Re: Lenses stolen
 
 mike wilson wrote:
 From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 Bo-Ming Tong
  
  
  Odd.  That guy is a well-respected member of a number of lists/forums.
 
 Yeah, he produced the first real Pentax FAQ, back in the day, and I am 
 pretty sure he hung out here for a while.

I _knew_ I'd seen the name in relation to PDML but couldn't remember where.  
Think I've just had my first real senior moment


-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software 
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Lenses stolen

2007-01-24 Thread Joseph Tainter
 Bo-Ming Tong
 
 
  Odd.  That guy is a well-respected member of a number of lists/forums.

Yeah, he produced the first real Pentax FAQ, back in the day, and I am
pretty sure he hung out here for a while.

-

The name sounds like a guy who once worked for Pentax Canada, and in the 
early 90s posted a description of the differences between F and FA lenses.

Joe

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Lenses stolen

2007-01-24 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 1/24/2007 8:18:13 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bo-Ming Tong


 Odd.  That guy is a well-respected member of a number of lists/forums.

Yeah, he produced the first real Pentax FAQ, back in the day, and I am
pretty sure he hung out here for a while.

-

The name sounds like a guy who once worked for Pentax Canada, and in the 
early 90s posted a description of the differences between F and FA lenses.

Joe

Then maybe he died or something. And his heirs are computer illiterate and 
haven't checked his email. Or he has no heirs.

One can't assume when someone disappears from the Net or some area of the 
Net, like a forum, that one knows what is actually going on in real life.

Sometimes people get too cyber in their thinking. 

Marnie aka Doe ;-)

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Lenses stolen

2007-01-24 Thread Cotty
Just had this through:



Just to follow up on this, it seems that the matter is being cleared up. 
There is a thread on fredmiranda.com where Bo-Ting has posted a response.

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__
||   (O)   | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: Lenses stolen

2007-01-24 Thread K.Takeshita
On 1/24/07 11:16 AM, Joseph Tainter, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The name sounds like a guy who once worked for Pentax Canada

I think he is a different guy.  IIRC, his name was something like Coon and
was a service person out of Pentax Vancouver.

Ken


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net