Re: My first photo-wedding

2004-01-06 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
Boris wrote:

So when he recovered, he turned to me and said something like Bro, we have
a dangerous job. I was very pleased, one may say g.

Cool, a feather to put in your hat! Congratulations...

 It would take too much of mental power out of me.  It is plain difficult.
Since I came to have fun, I did have fun. But I wasn't paid for that.

Glad that you had fun Boris!  What you say is so true.  It is truly
draining, and Bill's sentiments about the whole whoring thing couldn't
ring truer.  For every wedding that I do, I hand over the proofs feeling
that a little piece of me is going with them.  I now give the negs with my
packages (they get them after their family have ordered
prints/enlargements), cause I just keep the scans, and I am generally
petrified of being responsible for storing them for goodness knows how many
years to come.  The first wedding that I did this for, it just about tore my
soul out.  I was literally shaking as I passed the negs to the couple, as I
felt that I was also giving them a very personal part of myself.  Of course,
I am learning to deal with this now, and all is getting better in that
respect, and like I said, I have since discovered the joys of roll scanning
with processing, so I at least get to keep copies of everything that I
shoot.

But anyways, the point was, that yes, it is emotionally, mentally,
intellectually draining.  And the best cure for this is to eat a huge block
of chocolate, and listen to loud, boppy music in the car on the way home,
whilst singing very loud and hoping to God that no-one hears you! lol.
(yes, I admit to having done this MANY times, but I probably drive many more
km's than most of you too.  The wedding I have this Friday, I will be doing
a 750km round trip for, and all in the one day.  So, singing and chocolate
helps...!

 By the way, Tanya, do you do weddings with MZ-6 you have? If so, I must
really ask, how on earth you manage to time your shots w.r.t. very slow and
unreliable AF of this camera, even with such a lens as FA 50/1.7. I missed
several shots just because the darn thing wouldn't focus, even with its
middle sensor...

Hmmm, now let me think.  At the risk of sounding blasphemous,  I generally
keep the MZ-6 as a second camera, loaded with bw and with said FA 50mm f1.7
lens attached, and use my much older, less featured cameras as my main ones.
I only shoot an average of 2-3 rolls of bw per wedding, so it doesn't really
get much of a workout.  (The main cameras that I use are the Z-20, which I
love!  Don't ask me why, I think it is just the feel of the thing in my
hand, but I also know the controls so well now that it is very intuitive to
me to use this camera).  Anyways, back to the question...  When I do use the
MZ-6 with that lens, I almost always use it for shots that I have already
taken in colour and have then thought to myself oooh, that would be a good
one in BW, so I'll generally set it up to look as similar as possible, and
then reshoot it.  Also, I shoot in Manual focus alot, so in light of these
two things, I'd have to say that I have never even noticed the AF problems.
I am assuming that you were shooting with the camera in a Portrait hold when
this happened?  The only time with any of my cameras that I have had
problems with the AF is when I am holding the camera this way.  I always get
around it by turning it around to hold it in the Landscape position, AF on
my object, and half press the shutter to lock the focus (or quickly switch
it to manual focus) and then turn camera back to the Portrait hold to shoot
the image.  Sounds like a long-winded process, but really, it is second
nature to me now, and takes probably less than 2 or 3 seconds to do it.  I
almost never change the AF switch thingy to the wide option, always
keeping it on the little middle point option thingy so that I always know
what point in the pic will be most in focus.  (I know that said thingies
have proper names, but I never remember these things.  I know what the
buttons do and that's all that matters to me, who cares about their names?)

 Well, I'd appreciate any responses, including some advise.

Well, I probably shouldn't really be giving advice cause I am such a newbie
at it myself, however, I hope my comments have helped, and I can't wait to
see the pics!

Tan.



Re: My first photo-wedding

2004-01-06 Thread Bruce Dayton
Hello Boris,

As a rule of thumb, I don't autofocus unless I am unable to make the
shot with manual focus.  In a wedding, that is rare.  I also find that
using AF for everything, tends to influence my composition. The reason
is that the sensor needs to be pointing at the point of focus (which
most of the time, is not where the sensor is pointing).  This means
you have to focus lock, and then re-compose.  It ends up being just as
fast to compose/manually focus as to focus lock and recompose.  AF is
best suited to situations where the subjects are moving and you can't
keep up.  The only one that comes to mind for weddings, is that trip
up the aisle.  Even there, getting a snap at the beginning, middle and
end are possible with manual focus.

I suspect you'll get a few piping in that this is one of the weak
areas for Pentax.  So my big tip is practice manually focusing and
stay in control of that camera.

-- 
Best regards,
Bruce



Tuesday, January 6, 2004, 1:02:34 AM, you wrote:

BL Hi!

snip


BL By the way, Tanya, do you do weddings with MZ-6 you have? If so, I
BL must really ask, how on earth you manage to time your shots w.r.t.
BL very slow and unreliable AF of this camera, even with such a lens as
BL FA 50/1.7. I missed several shots just because the darn thing wouldn't
BL focus, even with its middle sensor...

BL 3. At least in my case 3200 film was all right. It was enough to shoot
BL mostly at f/4, about 1/30-1/60 sec and sometimes with my F 85 soft
BL lens at f/5.6 or even f/8 with help of RTF flash...

BL Well, I'd appreciate any responses, including some advise.

BL Thanks for listening.

BL Boris