Re: OLD Film needs developing

2005-02-06 Thread m.9.wilson

 
 From: Jim and Lynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2005/02/05 Sat PM 03:22:55 GMT
 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
 Subject: OLD Film needs developing
 
 Does anyone know where I can get some really old exposed film developed to
 see if any pictures survived?  

Try this lot:

http://www.processc22.co.uk/

mike

-
Email provided by http://www.ntlhome.com/




Re: OLD Film needs developing

2005-02-05 Thread Lasse Karlsson
From: Jim and Lynn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 5:22 PM
Subject: OLD Film needs developing


 Does anyone know where I can get some really old exposed film developed to
 see if any pictures survived?  I found a large number of rolls from years
 ago when my kids were small and would like to see if I can salvage anything.
 Didn't have the money then to get them developed.  Probably still don't!!
 LOL!!
 
 Any help would be appreciated.
 
 Thanks,
 Jim

Hi Jim,

It would help if you'd tell us exactly what kind of film types we're talking 
about and roughly when years ago was. (Like 5, 10, 20, 30, or 50 years ago...)
(If they are a bit old but still use developing processes in use today, there 
will be many places you can get them processed. If not you may have to look 
further.) 
Btw. I'm no expert on this, why someone else will have to step in to give you 
better advice.

Good luck!

Lasse




Re: OLD Film needs developing

2005-02-05 Thread pnstenquist
If it's 35mm film, you can take it to any decent lab. If it's ssomething odd 
like 127 or 126, you'll have to find a lab that specializes in processing old 
film types. I would search the web. If it's black and white film, I'd ask the 
lab to push it one stop (overdevelop it). If it's color, I'd proabably take my 
chances with normal processing. I tried developing a fifty year old roll of 
verichrome pan 120 that was probably exposed. It turned out to be completely 
black, but for all I know the camera might have been opened at some time.  Good 
luck.
Paul


 Does anyone know where I can get some really old exposed film developed to
 see if any pictures survived?  I found a large number of rolls from years
 ago when my kids were small and would like to see if I can salvage anything.
 Didn't have the money then to get them developed.  Probably still don't!!
 LOL!!
 
 Any help would be appreciated.
 
 Thanks,
 Jim
 



Re: OLD Film needs developing

2005-02-05 Thread Butch Black
Paul wrote:
If it's 35mm film, you can take it to any decent lab. If it's something odd 
like 127 or 126, you'll have to find a lab that specializes in processing 
old film types. I would search the web. If it's black and white film, I'd 
ask the lab to push it one stop (overdevelop it). If it's color, I'd 
probably take my chances with normal processing. I tried developing a fifty 
year old roll of verichrome pan 120 that was probably exposed. It turned out 
to be completely black, but for all I know the camera might have been opened 
at some time.  Good luck.
Paul

Actually if it's color print film you need to determine if it's C-22 or C-41 
process. If it's c-41 you can try bringing it to any lab. If it's slide film 
(Ektachrome) you need to determine if it is E-2, E-3, E-4, or E-6. E-6 is 
the current process. Kodachrome current process is K-14. If it's a current 
film you can bring it to a lab that does that type of processing. If it's an 
older film you can try Rocky Mountain film labs in Colorado. BW should be 
developable by any good BW lab. MY best guess is that any of the older 
color process films will have lost any latent image by now. The BW is 
definitely worth a try.

Butch 




OLD Film needs developing

2005-02-05 Thread Jim and Lynn
Does anyone know where I can get some really old exposed film developed to
see if any pictures survived?  I found a large number of rolls from years
ago when my kids were small and would like to see if I can salvage anything.
Didn't have the money then to get them developed.  Probably still don't!!
LOL!!

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Jim