Re: OT: Digital High Key
I like some of those, esp #7 Shel [Original Message] From: Marco Alpert Same thing happened to me and lead to these: http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo/jazz.html (and following)
Re: OT: Digital High Key
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does anyone have any experience making High Key photographs using a digital camera? Regards Jens Bladt Only by accident :-) The flash wasn't seated properly on the camera and went off at full power http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/20768288 Wendy Wendy Beard Ottawa, Canada
Re: OT: Digital High Key
That was my story as well... http://www.flickr.com/photos/fwwidall/10309690/ -- Fred Widall, Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.ist.uwaterloo.ca/~fwwidall Images: http://www.flickr.com/photos/fwwidall -- On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, wendy beard wrote: Only by accident :-) The flash wasn't seated properly on the camera and went off at full power http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/20768288 Wendy Wendy Beard Ottawa, Canada
Re: OT: Digital High Key
Same thing happened to me and lead to these: http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo/jazz.html (and following) - Marco Only by accident :-) The flash wasn't seated properly on the camera and went off at full power http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/20768288 Wendy Wendy Beard Ottawa, Canada
Re: OT: Digital High Key
Jens Does anyone have any experience making High Key photographs using a digital camera? Does this one count: http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=203388 ? It was obtained by PSEL manipulation. Boris
Re: OT: Digital High Key
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: You mean like http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/33.htm ?? Wow! Some attitude! Did you capture it like that or is it processed (other than the BW conversion)? And is it backlit? Very good. Kostas
Re: OT: Digital High Key
On Sep 5, 2005, at 2:22 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote: You mean like http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/33.htm ?? Wow! Some attitude! Did you capture it like that or is it processed (other than the BW conversion)? And is it backlit? Very good. Thank you. Yes, that's pretty much as captured, with BW conversion of course. They were heavily backlit by the evening sky. Godfrey
Re: OT: Digital High Key
Hi, Marnie, High-Key, normal, and Low-Key respectively refer to the tonal range of the print. High-Key is a print with very little dark area. Normal is, of course, a print with a full tonal range. and Low-Key is a print with very little light area. Properly done there should be some shadow detail in a high-key print (usually the eyes in high-key portraits), and some high-lights in a low-key print (again usually the catch-lights in the eyes in the case of portraits. So properly the prints really do have a full tonal range but the high-lights predominate in a high-key print, and the shadows predominate in a low-key print. graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com Idiot Proof == Expert Proof --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 9/4/2005 2:04:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does anyone have any experience making High Key photographs using a digital camera? Regards Jens Bladt = What does High Key mean? TIA, Marnie aka Doe (Never afraid to admit when I don't know/understand something.) -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.18/90 - Release Date: 9/5/2005
Re: OT: Digital High Key
In a message dated 9/5/2005 2:58:37 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Marnie, High-Key, normal, and Low-Key respectively refer to the tonal range of the print. High-Key is a print with very little dark area. Normal is, of course, a print with a full tonal range. and Low-Key is a print with very little light area. Properly done there should be some shadow detail in a high-key print (usually the eyes in high-key portraits), and some high-lights in a low-key print (again usually the catch-lights in the eyes in the case of portraits. So properly the prints really do have a full tonal range but the high-lights predominate in a high-key print, and the shadows predominate in a low-key print. graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com Idiot Proof == Expert Proof --- === Thanks, graywolf. In a photography class I took once (yeah, that one) one of the students shot children in what I suppose was a high key manner. Not all the time, but some of the time. It often made for a very striking portrait. Nice to learn new terms, especially for things I've already seen. Marnie :-)
OT: Digital High Key
Does anyone have any experience making High Key photographs using a digital camera? Regards Jens Bladt
Re: OT: Digital High Key
You mean like http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/33.htm ?? Godfrey On Sep 4, 2005, at 2:03 PM, Jens Bladt wrote: Does anyone have any experience making High Key photographs using a digital camera?
Re: OT: Digital High Key
In a message dated 9/4/2005 2:04:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does anyone have any experience making High Key photographs using a digital camera? Regards Jens Bladt = What does High Key mean? TIA, Marnie aka Doe (Never afraid to admit when I don't know/understand something.)
Re: OT: Digital High Key
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 9/4/2005 2:04:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does anyone have any experience making High Key photographs using a digital camera? Regards Jens Bladt = What does High Key mean? TIA, Marnie aka Doe (Never afraid to admit when I don't know/understand something.) High key is generally accomplished by obtaining an exposure at the high (overexposed) end of the exposure spectrum, but not necessarily blown out. The classic example is a nearly white shot of a forest with freshly fallen snow, where minute differences in bright shadings comprise the bulk of the 'feel' of the picture. Low-key is the opposite. Think of a portrait of a person lit by candlelight in a smokey bar, for example. The trick is maintaining just enough detail to achieve the artistic effect desired.
