Re: OT: Instagram images

2020-05-01 Thread Steve Cottrell
On 1/5/20, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:

>*Some professional photographers are switching their Instagram accounts to
>private after a court ruling.* A judge ruled media companies could embed
>their Instagram posts in their articles without paying to use their work
>aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnV6emZlZWRuZXdzLmNvb
>S9hcnRpY2xlL2thdGVidWJhY3ovcHJvZmVzc2
>lvbmFsLXBob3RvZ3JhcGhlcnMtaW5zdGFncmFtLXByaXZhdGU/
>5ba8969a24c17c423a61beabBeee786d7>

Seems to me the answer for professional photographers is to clearly *not* post 
any saleable images through Instagram or have watermarks on the image. or not 
use the platform for saleable images - maybe a single lo-res image to drive 
traffic? If a photog earning money from his/her pics is using Insta as the sole 
output mechanism, then they probably deserve everything they get!




-- 

 /|___
  Cheers ///|  ))
Cotty/|   )))
   ///|)))
 /| )))
   ///| 
 /| )))
//|)))
  |___)))
___|
\ /
   ~
 Contest 33 'Iris' SSR148875


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


OT: Instagram images

2020-05-01 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
*Some professional photographers are switching their Instagram accounts to
private after a court ruling.* A judge ruled media companies could embed
their Instagram posts in their articles without paying to use their work

.

Dan Matyola
*https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery
*
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.