Re: Opinions requested: How good is the 645 A-35mm f/3.5? and generally, wide for MF ?

2002-11-13 Thread Mark Roberts
tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Michel Adam wrote:

 In search of the list wisdom...

 I am considering enabling me with a 35mm wide for my 645, and
 would like to get the views of the list users who have used this
 manual focus lens:

 How good is it wide open?

Very good.

 How good is it at the best aperture?

Excellent+. I think the 45-85 and 120/4 are sharper. It's about on par
with the 75, I guess.

I don't really do comparisons or strict lens tests.


 Any flare problem?

Not really. Seems to get about the same amount of flare as any other
Pentax WA.

The FA might be better in this regard as it has a dedicated tulip
hood. I think it was optically redesigned too.

 Apart from the obvious wider field of view, is it sharper than
 the A-45mm/2.8 ?

Couldn't say, I haven't got any film back from my FA 45 to compare.

I've used Tom's 35mm f3.5 and it *is* very good! I only used it for a day
and didn't take a lot of shots with it, but I really liked the ones I did
get.

-- 
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
Photography and writing




Re: Opinions requested: How good is the 645 A-35mm

2002-11-13 Thread W.Xato
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:49:37 -0500
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Michel Adam wrote:
 In search of the list wisdom...
 I am considering enabling me with a 35mm wide for
my 645, and
 would like to get the views of the list users who
have used this manual focus lens:
 How good is it wide open?

It and the 300/4 are my favorites for the P645.  I
usually use it at f8 or f11 so really can't say how it
does wide open.

Warren


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com