PAW: Trinidad Beach

2004-05-19 Thread Bruce Dayton
This was taken walking along the beach just below the Trinidad
lighthouse.  There is a seal in the lower right hand corner, for those
who care.  I have played around with crops and haven't found any that
improve the image for me.  Comments welcome.

http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/imgp6809.htm

Pentax *istD, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6 LD, handheld,
ISO 800, 1/3000, F8, manual focus

Bruce



Re: PAW: Trinidad Beach

2004-05-19 Thread brooksdj
I like seals.

I think its ok left in the shot,Bruce. Helps add something to the water. 
Is that mist behind the rocks or just very hazy.

Nice shot BTW

Dave

> This was taken walking along the beach just 
below the Trinidad
> lighthouse.  There is a seal in the lower right hand corner, for those
> who care.  I have played around with crops and haven't found any that
> improve the image for me.  Comments welcome.
> 
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/imgp6809.htm
> 
> Pentax *istD, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6 LD, handheld,
> ISO 800, 1/3000, F8, manual focus
> 
> Bruce
> 






Re: PAW: Trinidad Beach

2004-05-19 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Very nice.  You caught the birds in really interesting poses.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
This was taken walking along the beach just below the Trinidad
lighthouse.  There is a seal in the lower right hand corner, for those
who care.  I have played around with crops and haven't found any that
improve the image for me.  Comments welcome.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/imgp6809.htm
Pentax *istD, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6 LD, handheld,
ISO 800, 1/3000, F8, manual focus
Bruce
.
 

--
Daniel J. Matyola (908)725-3322  fax:(908)707-0399
Stanley, Powers & Matyola mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
78 Grove Street   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Somerville, NJ 08876  http://geocities.com/dmatyola/



Re: PAW: Trinidad Beach

2004-05-19 Thread Peter J. Alling
On my monitor the seals head looks like a rock, What makes the photo for 
me is the bird with it's wings
out spread on top of the rock.

Bruce Dayton wrote:
This was taken walking along the beach just below the Trinidad
lighthouse.  There is a seal in the lower right hand corner, for those
who care.  I have played around with crops and haven't found any that
improve the image for me.  Comments welcome.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/imgp6809.htm
Pentax *istD, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6 LD, handheld,
ISO 800, 1/3000, F8, manual focus
Bruce
 




RE: PAW: Trinidad Beach

2004-05-19 Thread frank theriault
Hi, Bruce,
Nice photo.  I take it this is full frame?  Well, I like it as is.  I don't 
see any cropping improving it, either.

I like the big rock off centre.  I like the little rock in the foreground, 
giving the feeling of depth.  And, of course, there's that seal!  

The only thing I'm not sure about is that I find the background very hazy.  
I know there's nothing you could do about it, but still, it's there.  It's 
really just a small thing, and detracts little (if at all) from a beautiful 
photo.

cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.  The pessimist 
fears it is true."  -J. Robert Oppenheimer



From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW:  Trinidad Beach
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 09:23:18 -0700
This was taken walking along the beach just below the Trinidad
lighthouse.  There is a seal in the lower right hand corner, for those
who care.  I have played around with crops and haven't found any that
improve the image for me.  Comments welcome.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/imgp6809.htm
Pentax *istD, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6 LD, handheld,
ISO 800, 1/3000, F8, manual focus
Bruce
_
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines


Re: PAW: Trinidad Beach

2004-05-19 Thread Bruce Dayton
Thanks for the comments Frank.  It is full frame - I played around
with cropping and just didn't get any good feeling from it.  As to the
background, this is northern California coast - fog is the name of the
game.  It burns off as the sun shines, but earlier in the day, it does
look kind of like this.  I wonder if it was clearer if that would take
away from the birds - they might blend in too much.

Anyway, thanks for the comments.

-- 
Best regards,
Bruce


Wednesday, May 19, 2004, 6:57:12 PM, you wrote:

ft> Hi, Bruce,

ft> Nice photo.  I take it this is full frame?  Well, I like it as is.  I don't
ft> see any cropping improving it, either.

ft> I like the big rock off centre.  I like the little rock in the foreground,
ft> giving the feeling of depth.  And, of course, there's that seal!  

ft> The only thing I'm not sure about is that I find the background very hazy.
ft> I know there's nothing you could do about it, but still, it's there.  It's
ft> really just a small thing, and detracts little (if at all) from a beautiful
ft> photo.

ft> cheers,
ft> frank

ft> "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
ft> fears it is true."  -J. Robert Oppenheimer




>>From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: PAW:  Trinidad Beach
>>Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 09:23:18 -0700
>>
>>This was taken walking along the beach just below the Trinidad
>>lighthouse.  There is a seal in the lower right hand corner, for those
>>who care.  I have played around with crops and haven't found any that
>>improve the image for me.  Comments welcome.
>>
>>http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/imgp6809.htm
>>
>>Pentax *istD, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6 LD, handheld,
>>ISO 800, 1/3000, F8, manual focus
>>
>>Bruce
>>

ft> _
ft> 
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines




Re: PAW: Trinidad Beach

2004-05-19 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi Bruce ...

I fiddled with the pic in PS, cloned out the rock in front, and y'know
what? It loses something.  The photo becomes too bare.  Something was
needed in the foreground.

Shel Belinkoff


> [Original Message]
> From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 5/19/2004 8:48:12 PM
> Subject: Re: PAW: Trinidad Beach
>
> Thanks for the comments Frank.  It is full frame - I played around
> with cropping and just didn't get any good feeling from it. 




Re: PAW: Trinidad Beach

2004-05-19 Thread Bruce Dayton
Perhaps it would never be a great photo - just a nice one of the area
there.  If the rock is in, it detracts and if you take it out,
something is missing.  Thanks for taking a shot at it.

Bruce


Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 10:58:54 PM, you wrote:

SB> Hi Bruce ...

SB> I fiddled with the pic in PS, cloned out the rock in front, and y'know
SB> what? It loses something.  The photo becomes too bare.  Something was
SB> needed in the foreground.

SB> Shel Belinkoff


>> [Original Message]
>> From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: 5/19/2004 8:48:12 PM
>> Subject: Re: PAW: Trinidad Beach
>>
>> Thanks for the comments Frank.  It is full frame - I played around
>> with cropping and just didn't get any good feeling from it. 





Re: PAW: Trinidad Beach

2004-05-19 Thread Dario Bonazza
My suggested cropping:

http://www.dariobonazza.com/paw/imgp6809_std.jpg

I believe this adds some sense of mystery, due to the less identifiable
background (also highlighting the main subject), while keeping the depth
(thanks to the rock in the foreground).
Then, the "widescreen" format makes it more dynamic. Or, at least, I feel
that.

Dario


- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: PAW: Trinidad Beach


> Thanks for the comments Frank.  It is full frame - I played around
> with cropping and just didn't get any good feeling from it.  As to the
> background, this is northern California coast - fog is the name of the
> game.  It burns off as the sun shines, but earlier in the day, it does
> look kind of like this.  I wonder if it was clearer if that would take
> away from the birds - they might blend in too much.
>
> Anyway, thanks for the comments.
>



Re: PAW: Trinidad Beach

2004-05-19 Thread Shel Belinkoff
I like that crop ... ;-))

Shel Belinkoff


> [Original Message]
> From: Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 5/19/2004 11:53:20 PM
> Subject: Re: PAW: Trinidad Beach
>
> My suggested cropping:
>
> http://www.dariobonazza.com/paw/imgp6809_std.jpg
>
> I believe this adds some sense of mystery, due to the less identifiable
> background (also highlighting the main subject), while keeping the depth
> (thanks to the rock in the foreground).
> Then, the "widescreen" format makes it more dynamic. Or, at least, I feel
> that.




Re: PAW: Trinidad Beach

2004-06-06 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi!

Sorry I am late to join this talk here.

I do like original version better. To me the little space above the
birds just hurts. The birds need lots of space, me thinks ...

I think that it is just good as it is. Nothing I think needs to be
done on it.

Unlike Frank, I do appreciate the blurred background. It adds a little
sense of space and also makes an excellent backdrop for contours of
birds and rocks.

Just my (late) pixels.

Boris


DB> My suggested cropping:

DB> http://www.dariobonazza.com/paw/imgp6809_std.jpg

DB> I believe this adds some sense of mystery, due to the less identifiable
DB> background (also highlighting the main subject), while keeping the depth
DB> (thanks to the rock in the foreground).
DB> Then, the "widescreen" format makes it more dynamic. Or, at least, I feel
DB> that.

DB> Dario


DB> - Original Message -
DB> From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DB> To: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
DB> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:44 AM
DB> Subject: Re: PAW: Trinidad Beach


>> Thanks for the comments Frank.  It is full frame - I played around
>> with cropping and just didn't get any good feeling from it.  As to the
>> background, this is northern California coast - fog is the name of the
>> game.  It burns off as the sun shines, but earlier in the day, it does
>> look kind of like this.  I wonder if it was clearer if that would take
>> away from the birds - they might blend in too much.
>>
>> Anyway, thanks for the comments.
>>