Re: Pentax 67 600mm f/4 review
I see more 67s in our future. No one will be sorry. Paul Mark Roberts wrote: > Dan Scott wrote: > > >http://www.luminous-landscape.com/600mm.htm > > > >an interesting read. Image quality comparison between the Pentax 600/4 and > >the Canon 300mm f/2.8L IS. One guess which wins... > > I just *love* the side-by-side photo of the 67II with the 600/4 next to the > Canon with the 300/2.8! > > Anyone who doesn't feel enabled by this article needs medical attention! > > -- > Mark Roberts > www.robertstech.com > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Pentax 67 600mm f/4 review
It was a well written article, but the author didn't mention film type selection . . . could that have added to either lenses final results? (I think I know the answer, but I thought I'd put it out there.) Illinois Bill Dan Scott wrote: > > When I saw the side-by-side of the two test shots, I could hear Paul Hogan > (a la "Crocodile Dundee") saying, "You call that a transparency? That's not > a transparency, now THIS, this is a transparency". Whoosh. :-) > > Dan Scott > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Mark wrote: > > > >I just *love* the side-by-side photo of the 67II with the 600/4 next to the > >Canon with the 300/2.8! > > > >Anyone who doesn't feel enabled by this article needs medical attention! > > > > > >-- > >Mark Roberts > >www.robertstech.com > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Pentax 67 600mm f/4 review
When I saw the side-by-side of the two test shots, I could hear Paul Hogan (a la "Crocodile Dundee") saying, "You call that a transparency? That's not a transparency, now THIS, this is a transparency". Whoosh. :-) Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark wrote: > >I just *love* the side-by-side photo of the 67II with the 600/4 next to the >Canon with the 300/2.8! > >Anyone who doesn't feel enabled by this article needs medical attention! > > >-- >Mark Roberts >www.robertstech.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: Pentax 67 600mm f/4 review
Dan Scott wrote: >http://www.luminous-landscape.com/600mm.htm > >an interesting read. Image quality comparison between the Pentax 600/4 and >the Canon 300mm f/2.8L IS. One guess which wins... I just *love* the side-by-side photo of the 67II with the 600/4 next to the Canon with the 300/2.8! Anyone who doesn't feel enabled by this article needs medical attention! -- Mark Roberts www.robertstech.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Pentax 67 600mm f/4 review
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/600mm.htm an interesting read. Image quality comparison between the Pentax 600/4 and the Canon 300mm f/2.8L IS. One guess which wins... Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
