Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-15 Thread Pål Jensen
Arnold wrote:

I can't believe that Pentax will leave its 35mm system like that, especially with the 
1.5x factor of the digital sensors. More extreme wide-angle lenses must eventually be 
coming. hopefully WITH aperture ring, so that they are usable on older cameras, 
too, and in * or Limited quality.


REPLY:
They have promised more lenses in the fall. This in their press release and also 
circulating in the rumor mill. The press release says it is lenses suited for the 
*istD something I think means wide angles. Some PDML member heard at PMA that there 
are both a 16/2.8 and a 16-35/2.8 coming. They both makes sense when Pentyax is 
manufacturing not full frame DSLR's. Time will tell.


Pål





Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-15 Thread Pål Jensen
Collin wrote:

Given how technology changes and how fabrication needs
would seem to require some consistency ...
I wonder how many of these were made all in one batch
with the expectation that they'd be sold over time.
Perhaps make 500 (in whole or parts awaiting later assembly)
knowing that the stock will last 15 years.
Seems practical.


REPLY:
Early on they may have manufactured the A lenses in batches. However, the last decade 
or so they have been hand-built from a depleting parts bin on order. Of course they 
may have been some stock left of assembled lenses but this is the general picture. 
Even the current lenses, like the super telephotos, are made on order. In Japan theres 
is one month waiting time if you order, say, an FA* 600/4. They make it for you on 
order. They may not even have parts for it but let the subcontractors deliver the 
parts on order.
Modern camera manufacturing is pretty much like car manufacturing. The subcontractors 
delivers the parts when they are needed - as close as possible to the date the 
equipment is being assembled. Eg. every major part assembly (the circuitry board, the 
chassis, the prism, the housing etc) on my old 645N have a manufacturing date printed 
on it. They are all within 2 weeks of each other. In fact, only one part are two weeks 
off. The rest is within three days.

Pål







Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-15 Thread Pål Jensen
Caveman:

They're not taken seriously there either. Otherwise we had heard of a third-party rush 
to provide digital backs for the 645 or 67.


REPLY:
There have been such a rush even if you haven't heard about it. I know people who 
have used a digital back for the 645N(II). The problem is that Pentax haven't 
committed to it. Those 3D party vendors don't start manufacturing of the back until 
the camera manufacturers agree about commitment. I don't know if Pentax have by now 
commited to it; they hadn't a few months back. Pentax have never been interested in 
film backs for thier MF systems. Perhaps they are not interested in digital backs 
either? Perhaps they rather release an 645D?

Pål





Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-15 Thread Alan Chan
They have promised more lenses in the fall. This in their press release and 
also circulating in the rumor mill. The press release says it is lenses 
suited for the *istD something I think means wide angles. Some PDML member 
heard at PMA that there are both a 16/2.8 and a 16-35/2.8 coming. They both 
makes sense when Pentyax is manufacturing not full frame DSLR's. Time will 
tell.
So the 16/2.8 won't be a replacement for the 15/3.5, but for digital only.  
:-(

regards,
Alan Chan
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*   
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-14 Thread collinb
Given how technology changes and how fabrication needs
would seem to require some consistency ...
I wonder how many of these were made all in one batch
with the expectation that they'd be sold over time.
Perhaps make 500 (in whole or parts awaiting later assembly)
knowing that the stock will last 15 years.
Seems practical.
Collin

At 05:09 AM 6/14/03 -0400, you wrote:
From: Roland Mabo [EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 22:08:14 -0400
2.  How Can We Afford to Keep Making a Lens Only 37 Photographers
Will Buy This Year? The obvious answer is that we can't afford to
stop making it if we want to keep calling ourselves a serious
photographic company. -
http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/k15f35ad.jpg
Yes, but the market demand for the A 15 must have been dropped seriously
lately. From 37 lenses a year to, perhaps, 37 lenses in 5 years...
Best wishes
Roland




Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-14 Thread Pål Jensen
Frantisek wrote:

I have just had this news from a Pentax dealer, that they have been
   told the Shift and 15/3.5 lenses are dropped, perhaps with several
   others of the manual focus lenses. Anyone else to confirm/deny?


REPLY:
No idea but it make sense. These lenses are either new old stock or made on order from 
a depleting parts bin.
Anyway, there are rumors about a 16/2.8. That could be a nice replacement for the 
15/3.5. 

Pål



Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-14 Thread Nick Zentena
On June 14, 2003 08:02 am, collinb wrote:
 Given how technology changes and how fabrication needs
 would seem to require some consistency ...
 I wonder how many of these were made all in one batch
 with the expectation that they'd be sold over time.
 Perhaps make 500 (in whole or parts awaiting later assembly)
 knowing that the stock will last 15 years.
 Seems practical.


Not sure about the 15 year part but it makes sense. 

Nick



Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-14 Thread Fred
 I wonder what the copy-writers marketing brief would be today?

How Can We Afford to Keep Making a Lens Only 3 or 4 Photographers
Will Buy This Year? The obvious answer is that we never really
could afford to make it, but now we no longer worry about calling
ourselves a serious photographic company.

Fred




Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-14 Thread Fred
 Yes, but the market demand for the A 15 must have been dropped
 seriously lately. From 37 lenses a year to, perhaps, 37 lenses in
 5 years...

Yes, could be.  Perhaps the original obvious answer [...] that we
can't afford to stop making it if we want to keep calling ourselves
a serious photographic company is not so obvious anymore - g...

The ad, of course, was for the SMC K version of the lens, and
perhaps a more recent ad ~could~ have said something such as How
Can We Afford to Keep Making a Lens Only 3 or 4 (or maybe 5 on a
leap year) Photographers Will Buy This Year?...

Fred




Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-14 Thread Mark Roberts
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 14 Jun 2003 at 9:32, Roland Mabo wrote:

 http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/k15f35ad.jpg
 
 Yes, but the market demand for the A 15 must have been dropped seriously 
 lately. From 37 lenses a year to, perhaps, 37 lenses in 5 years...

I wonder what the copy-writers marketing brief would be today?

Now that we have a DSLR and you actually *need* this lens we're going
to stop making it!

-- 
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com



Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-14 Thread T Rittenhouse
Well, I think NPC makes digital backs, and polaroid backs for them.

Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto


- Original Message -
From: Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...


 Alan Chan wrote:
  How Can We Afford to Keep Making a Lens Only 3 or 4 Photographers
  Will Buy This Year? The obvious answer is that we never really
  could afford to make it, but now we no longer worry about calling
  ourselves a serious photographic company.
 
  They still do, just that they carefully shift the attention to 120
format.

 They're not taken seriously there either. Otherwise we had heard of a
 third-party rush to provide digital backs for the 645 or 67.





Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-13 Thread kwaller
I probably would have bought one (Shift) several years
ago if it had the tilt feature. 

Kenneth Waller

On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 06:13:18 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 In a message dated 13/06/03 03:18:01 GMT Daylight
Time, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  I have just had this news from a Pentax
dealer,
 that they have been
  told the Shift and 15/3.5 lenses are dropped,
 perhaps with several
  others of the manual focus lenses. Anyone else
to
 confirm/deny?
  
  I am not surprised at all since the demand is close
to
 zero. However, I 
  regret that I do not have the money to buy the
A15/3.5
 before it 
  disappeared.  :-(
   
 
 We have supplied precisely one new 28mm F3.5 Shift in
5
 years. And one 15mm. 
 
 The 50mm F1.2 A ran out of stock early this year. More
 than likely these 
 lenses had been made many years ago and sat in a
 warehouse for years. Actually, 
 our customer for the 50mm wanted 15 of them - most
 Japanese optics companies 
 will make to order if sufficient orders are present.
 Another 11 was not enough.
 
 I think I know of a Japanese dealer who has purchased
a
 few as an 
 'investment'. I shall be visiting them shortly :)
 
 Kind regards
 
 Peter


PeoplePC:  It's for people. And it's just smart. 
http://www.peoplepc.com 



Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-13 Thread Arnold Stark
Dropping the 15f3.5 and the 28/f3.5 Shift after 30 years is no bad thing 
(especially if one already has them:-). However, the question is, will 
Pentax eventually present up-to-date successors? Or will there be no 
Shift lens at all, and no lenses shorter than the 17-28 Fish-Eye Zoom 
and the new FA-J 18-35? I can't believe that Pentax will leave its 35mm 
system like that, especially with the 1.5x factor of the digital 
sensors. More extreme wide-angle lenses must eventually be coming. 
hopefully WITH aperture ring, so that they are usable on older cameras, 
too, and in * or Limited quality.

Arnold.



Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-13 Thread Caveman
Arnold Stark wrote:
 Or will there be no
Shift lens at all, and no lenses shorter than the 17-28 Fish-Eye Zoom 
and the new FA-J 18-35?
Very plausible. Anyone serious enough as to consider a shift lens is 
thinking medium format or larger and not 35mm.

 I can't believe that Pentax will leave its 35mm
system like that, 
I definitely can. And BTW. They don't have a system anymore. The 
pieces don't interoperate.

cheers,
caveman


Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-13 Thread Paul Eriksson
Dropping the 15f3.5 and the 28/f3.5 Shift after 30 years is no bad thing 
(especially if one already has them:-). However, the question is, will 
Pentax eventually present up-to-date successors? Or will there be no Shift 
lens at all, and no lenses shorter than the 17-28 Fish-Eye Zoom and the new 
FA-J 18-35? I can't believe that Pentax will leave its 35mm system like 
that, especially with the 1.5x factor of the digital sensors. More extreme 
wide-angle lenses must eventually be coming. hopefully WITH aperture 
ring, so that they are usable on older cameras, too, and in * or Limited 
quality.

Arnold.

Maybe the rumour about a 16mm prime I heard a a couple of months ago is 
true?

_
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-13 Thread Fred
 I have just had this news from a Pentax dealer, that they have
 been  told the Shift and 15/3.5 lenses are dropped, perhaps  with
 several  others of the manual focus lenses. Anyone else to
 confirm/deny?

1.  Actually, the 28/3.5 Shift was not an M lens, but a K lens.

 I am not surprised at all since the demand is close to zero.

2.  How Can We Afford to Keep Making a Lens Only 37 Photographers
Will Buy This Year? The obvious answer is that we can't afford to
stop making it if we want to keep calling ourselves a serious
photographic company. -
http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/k15f35ad.jpg

Fred




Re: Pentax dropping M Shift, A 15/3.5, ...

2003-06-13 Thread Caveman
Fred wrote:
2.  How Can We Afford to Keep Making a Lens Only 37 Photographers
Will Buy This Year? The obvious answer is that we can't afford to
stop making it if we want to keep calling ourselves a serious
photographic company. -
http://www.cetussoft.com/pentax/k15f35ad.jpg
That was 1981. Now they don't bother anymore about not being taken 
seriously.

cheers,
caveman (back to skinning; I relly hate glue on keyboars)