Re: Pixel-peek (you know you want to) K-5 vs K-5iis

2012-10-25 Thread William Robb

On 24/10/2012 1:48 PM, Darren Addy wrote:


I leave it as an exercise for the reader to decide if that makes it
worth the price of an upgrade from your K-5. I believe that most
people will be putting more emphasis on its AF capabilities, as
compared to the K-5, before deciding. But I think I'm going to remain
happy with my K-5 for a long time to come.



I have one of the K5s that has completely useless AF in low tungsten 
light, so for me, the K5II series might well be worth it if it actually 
works properly. However, I'll sit this one out for a while and see if 
Ricoh has fixed the other dozen or so points of failure that plagued the 
K5, and also to see if they come up with something that has the 24mp 
Sony sensor.



--

William Robb

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Pixel-peek (you know you want to) K-5 vs K-5iis

2012-10-24 Thread Darren Addy
Don't know if you've seen this already or not, but here is a
comparison of a Japanese Yen note photographed with the same lens (FA
31mm f1.8 AL Limited) on a K-5 and then with a K-5iis

K-5
http://pentax.briefing-paper.com/1121
Posted in May

K-5iis
http://pentax.briefing-paper.com/1864
Posted today

If you are like me, the first thing that will hit you is the color
difference. At first I assumed that they were taken side-by-side on
the same day, but the fact that they were taken 5 months apart makes
me wonder about the light conditions (color) that each was taken
under. The color of the K-5 is much more pleasing, to my eye.

The K-5iis image is clearly sharper (read the text that wraps around
the starburst in the upper right) but one might argue the K-5 is
sharp enough. The bottom photo on each page is with extra sharpness
(in camera). I put the images side by side in a single photoshop image
so I could do some comparing. The extra sharpness K-5 image beats the
zero sharpness K-5iis (to my eye). The commentator on the page (Google
Chrome translation) says the same thing in reverse: With a sense of
resolution (sharpness 0) normal state, there seems to be almost the
same degree of proficiency and extra sharpness +1 in K-5.

I leave it as an exercise for the reader to decide if that makes it
worth the price of an upgrade from your K-5. I believe that most
people will be putting more emphasis on its AF capabilities, as
compared to the K-5, before deciding. But I think I'm going to remain
happy with my K-5 for a long time to come.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Pixel-peek (you know you want to) K-5 vs K-5iis

2012-10-24 Thread Paul Stenquist
No pixel peeping there. The images are only 718 pixels on each side. Hard to 
determine anything on the basis of such mall images, although I did compare the 
two f4 images, and while the color varies greatly (no color space assigned), 
one does appear to be somewhat sharper than the other.
Pul
On Oct 24, 2012, at 3:48 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Don't know if you've seen this already or not, but here is a
 comparison of a Japanese Yen note photographed with the same lens (FA
 31mm f1.8 AL Limited) on a K-5 and then with a K-5iis
 
 K-5
 http://pentax.briefing-paper.com/1121
 Posted in May
 
 K-5iis
 http://pentax.briefing-paper.com/1864
 Posted today
 
 If you are like me, the first thing that will hit you is the color
 difference. At first I assumed that they were taken side-by-side on
 the same day, but the fact that they were taken 5 months apart makes
 me wonder about the light conditions (color) that each was taken
 under. The color of the K-5 is much more pleasing, to my eye.
 
 The K-5iis image is clearly sharper (read the text that wraps around
 the starburst in the upper right) but one might argue the K-5 is
 sharp enough. The bottom photo on each page is with extra sharpness
 (in camera). I put the images side by side in a single photoshop image
 so I could do some comparing. The extra sharpness K-5 image beats the
 zero sharpness K-5iis (to my eye). The commentator on the page (Google
 Chrome translation) says the same thing in reverse: With a sense of
 resolution (sharpness 0) normal state, there seems to be almost the
 same degree of proficiency and extra sharpness +1 in K-5.
 
 I leave it as an exercise for the reader to decide if that makes it
 worth the price of an upgrade from your K-5. I believe that most
 people will be putting more emphasis on its AF capabilities, as
 compared to the K-5, before deciding. But I think I'm going to remain
 happy with my K-5 for a long time to come.
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Pixel-peek (you know you want to) K-5 vs K-5iis

2012-10-24 Thread Darren Addy
The size of the cropped image is irrelevant if it is an actual pixel
size image (which they are). The FA31 is not a macro lens.
: )

They've just saved you a lot of time and bandwidth over downloading
the full image (and also made it practical to put them side-by-side on
screen).

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Pixel-peek (you know you want to) K-5 vs K-5iis

2012-10-24 Thread David Parsons
It doesn't really prove much IMO.  Without controlling for variables
such as lighting, distance, focus, microfocus adjustment, it's just
two pictures of a note.

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
 The size of the cropped image is irrelevant if it is an actual pixel
 size image (which they are). The FA31 is not a macro lens.
 : )

 They've just saved you a lot of time and bandwidth over downloading
 the full image (and also made it practical to put them side-by-side on
 screen).

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.



-- 
David Parsons Photography
http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com

Aloha Photographer Photoblog
http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.