Re: Pixel-peeping madness - something smells
Perhaps if they were more careful about focusing... On 11/10/2012 2:16 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote: Hmmm... looks like a rather different focus plane shows up there. Just compare the playing card on the background (K-5 is better) and the wrist watch on the forefront (K-5 is worse). Dario -Messaggio originale- From: J.C. O'Connell Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 7:38 AM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: Pixel-peeping madness - something smells something is fishy. compare the k5 to the k5II both set to iso200 and look at the face of the wristwatch. the hour markers look completely different and these two cameras are supposed to have same image quality. - J.C.O'Connell hifis...@gate.net - -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim Bray Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pixel-peeping madness Aaand, once again: http://goo.gl/YY2rt On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:56 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: link? - J.C.O'Connell hifis...@gate.net - -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim Bray Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 10:54 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Pixel-peeping madness DPR has samples so you can do close-in comparison... here are the K-5, the K-5 II, and K-5 IIs doing ISO6400 RAW. The IIs may have big advantages, but they're sure not on display here. Zero in on anything that has intense red saturation; I was surprised by what I saw. Having said that, I totally disapprove of pixel-peeping. Anyhow, that's my story and I'm sticking to it. -T -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a lengthly search. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Pixel-peeping madness - something smells
I meant foreground, of course... -Messaggio originale- From: Dario Bonazza Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 8:16 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pixel-peeping madness - something smells Hmmm... looks like a rather different focus plane shows up there. Just compare the playing card on the background (K-5 is better) and the wrist watch on the forefront (K-5 is worse). Dario -Messaggio originale- From: J.C. O'Connell Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 7:38 AM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: Pixel-peeping madness - something smells something is fishy. compare the k5 to the k5II both set to iso200 and look at the face of the wristwatch. the hour markers look completely different and these two cameras are supposed to have same image quality. - J.C.O'Connell hifis...@gate.net - -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim Bray Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pixel-peeping madness Aaand, once again: http://goo.gl/YY2rt On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:56 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: link? - J.C.O'Connell hifis...@gate.net - -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim Bray Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 10:54 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Pixel-peeping madness DPR has samples so you can do close-in comparison... here are the K-5, the K-5 II, and K-5 IIs doing ISO6400 RAW. The IIs may have big advantages, but they're sure not on display here. Zero in on anything that has intense red saturation; I was surprised by what I saw. Having said that, I totally disapprove of pixel-peeping. Anyhow, that's my story and I'm sticking to it. -T -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. - Nessun virus nel messaggio. Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com Versione: 2012.0.2221 / Database dei virus: 2441/5384 - Data di rilascio: 09/11/2012 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. - Nessun virus nel messaggio. Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com Versione: 2012.0.2221 / Database dei virus: 2441/5384 - Data di rilascio: 09/11/2012 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: Pixel-peeping madness - something smells
they must be using AF... - J.C.O'Connell hifis...@gate.net - -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Dario Bonazza Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 2:17 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pixel-peeping madness - something smells Hmmm... looks like a rather different focus plane shows up there. Just compare the playing card on the background (K-5 is better) and the wrist watch on the forefront (K-5 is worse). Dario -Messaggio originale- From: J.C. O'Connell Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 7:38 AM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: Pixel-peeping madness - something smells something is fishy. compare the k5 to the k5II both set to iso200 and look at the face of the wristwatch. the hour markers look completely different and these two cameras are supposed to have same image quality. - J.C.O'Connell hifis...@gate.net - -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim Bray Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pixel-peeping madness Aaand, once again: http://goo.gl/YY2rt On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:56 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: > link? > > - > J.C.O'Connell > hifis...@gate.net > - > > -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim Bray > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 10:54 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Pixel-peeping madness > > DPR has samples so you can do close-in comparison... here are the K-5, > the K-5 II, and K-5 IIs doing ISO6400 RAW. > > The IIs may have big advantages, but they're sure not on display here. > Zero in on anything that has intense red saturation; I was surprised > by what I saw. > > Having said that, I totally disapprove of pixel-peeping. Anyhow, > that's my story and I'm sticking to it. -T > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. - Nessun virus nel messaggio. Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com Versione: 2012.0.2221 / Database dei virus: 2441/5384 - Data di rilascio: 09/11/2012 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Pixel-peeping madness - something smells
Hmmm... looks like a rather different focus plane shows up there. Just compare the playing card on the background (K-5 is better) and the wrist watch on the forefront (K-5 is worse). Dario -Messaggio originale- From: J.C. O'Connell Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 7:38 AM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: Pixel-peeping madness - something smells something is fishy. compare the k5 to the k5II both set to iso200 and look at the face of the wristwatch. the hour markers look completely different and these two cameras are supposed to have same image quality. - J.C.O'Connell hifis...@gate.net - -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim Bray Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pixel-peeping madness Aaand, once again: http://goo.gl/YY2rt On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:56 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: link? - J.C.O'Connell hifis...@gate.net - -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim Bray Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 10:54 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Pixel-peeping madness DPR has samples so you can do close-in comparison... here are the K-5, the K-5 II, and K-5 IIs doing ISO6400 RAW. The IIs may have big advantages, but they're sure not on display here. Zero in on anything that has intense red saturation; I was surprised by what I saw. Having said that, I totally disapprove of pixel-peeping. Anyhow, that's my story and I'm sticking to it. -T -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. - Nessun virus nel messaggio. Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com Versione: 2012.0.2221 / Database dei virus: 2441/5384 - Data di rilascio: 09/11/2012 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: Pixel-peeping madness - something smells
something is fishy. compare the k5 to the k5II both set to iso200 and look at the face of the wristwatch. the hour markers look completely different and these two cameras are supposed to have same image quality. - J.C.O'Connell hifis...@gate.net - -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim Bray Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 1:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Pixel-peeping madness Aaand, once again: http://goo.gl/YY2rt On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:56 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: > link? > > - > J.C.O'Connell > hifis...@gate.net > - > > -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim Bray > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 10:54 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Pixel-peeping madness > > DPR has samples so you can do close-in comparison... here are the K-5, > the K-5 II, and K-5 IIs doing ISO6400 RAW. > > The IIs may have big advantages, but they're sure not on display here. > Zero in on anything that has intense red saturation; I was surprised > by what I saw. > > Having said that, I totally disapprove of pixel-peeping. Anyhow, > that's my story and I'm sticking to it. -T > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
