RE: PESO: Old Stone Wall, cropped
I'm not with the rest of the list on this. Cropping away the litter is one thing, but cutting at right does not improve anything IMO. I like the tree as framing. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > -Original Message- > From: Rick Womer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 25. april 2006 03:42 > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > Subject: PESO: Old Stone Wall, cropped > > Bruce suggested cropping the image a bit, and here is > the result: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4377188 > > Here is the original: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367728 > > Comments? > > Rick > > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >
Re: PESO: Old Stone Wall, cropped
The composition of the cropped photo is a little better, maybe, for me. But the rendering has gone to mush. G On Apr 25, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: Nothing looks sharp - the image looks like it's slightly pixilated in some areas. Am I the only one seeing that? The crop is definitely better, though. Shel From: Rick Womer Bruce suggested cropping the image a bit, and here is the result: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4377188 Here is the original: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367728
RE: PESO: Old Stone Wall, cropped
Shel, I just copied, pasted, opened, and blew up the pic. The jpg conversion is awful, and a lot of detail is smooshed. I don't know why. Sigh. Rick --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nothing looks sharp - the image looks like it's > slightly pixilated in some > areas. Am I the only one seeing that? The crop is > definitely better, > though. > > Shel > > > >From: Rick Womer > > >Bruce suggested cropping the image a bit, and here > is > >the result: > > >http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4377188 > > >Here is the original: > > >http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367728 > > > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: PESO: Old Stone Wall, cropped
Nothing looks sharp - the image looks like it's slightly pixilated in some areas. Am I the only one seeing that? The crop is definitely better, though. Shel >From: Rick Womer >Bruce suggested cropping the image a bit, and here is >the result: >http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4377188 >Here is the original: >http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367728
RE: PESO: Old Stone Wall, cropped
I agree with Bruc'es cropping suggestion. The newer one is definitely stronger and looks like it removes some stray litter in the foreground. Tom C. From: Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: PESO: Old Stone Wall, cropped Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 18:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Bruce suggested cropping the image a bit, and here is the result: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4377188 Here is the original: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367728 Comments? Rick http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: PESO: Old Stone Wall, cropped
Well, I like it better (but then, I better ). It tightens up the image for me. -- Best regards, Bruce Monday, April 24, 2006, 6:41:50 PM, you wrote: RW> Bruce suggested cropping the image a bit, and here is RW> the result: RW> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4377188 RW> Here is the original: RW> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4367728 RW> Comments? RW> Rick RW> http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW RW> __ RW> Do You Yahoo!? RW> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around RW> http://mail.yahoo.com
