Re: Photofinishing

2001-12-06 Thread aimcompute

I'm always a little wary taking negative film down to the drugstore and
having a 19 year old girl do the processing while talking to her boyfriend
on the cell phone.

Your point is very well made. It's not where, it's who.  Month's back I
suggested we ALL mail our film to William Robb's Wal-mart as a joke.  Can
you see the volume he would get?

Tom C.

- Original Message -
From: Isaac Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:27 AM
Subject: Photofinishing


 There has been some disparaging words here about cheap
photofinishing vs
 a pro lab, and I'd just like to put in my two cents... I work at a place
 that prices itself between places like Walmart and the various custom labs
 around here. While its true that in general we produce with more
consistancy
 than places like Walmart and Eckerd's, that isn't always the rule. What I
have
 found to be the key issue is wheather the people running the lab care
about
 what they are doing moreso than where they are. I always tell my customers
 that photofinishers are like hairstylists (or barbars) in that if you find
 someone that does a good job, stick with them. If William Robb's Walmart
was
 near me, I'd be sorely tempted to get my 4x6's done there because it's
obvious
 that he cares, and he's got a killer price. That's an amazing combo, but
 unfortuenetly, it's all too rare. Most of the time, I get what I pay for.
Most
 places use similar (in capabilities) machines, even the pro labs for
4x6's.
 The difference comes down to who is using and maintaining them...

 Isaac
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Photofinishing

2001-12-06 Thread Isaac Crawford

- Original Message -
From: aimcompute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: Photofinishing


 I'm always a little wary taking negative film down to the drugstore and
 having a 19 year old girl do the processing while talking to her boyfriend
 on the cell phone.

Oh yeah... And they have their Coke right next to the machine and
they're popping bubbles with their gum as they print... I walk right out of
those places!

Isaac

 Your point is very well made. It's not where, it's who.  Month's back I
 suggested we ALL mail our film to William Robb's Wal-mart as a joke.  Can
 you see the volume he would get?

 Tom C.

 - Original Message -
 From: Isaac Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:27 AM
 Subject: Photofinishing


  There has been some disparaging words here about cheap
 photofinishing vs
  a pro lab, and I'd just like to put in my two cents... I work at a
place
  that prices itself between places like Walmart and the various custom
labs
  around here. While its true that in general we produce with more
 consistancy
  than places like Walmart and Eckerd's, that isn't always the rule. What
I
 have
  found to be the key issue is wheather the people running the lab care
 about
  what they are doing moreso than where they are. I always tell my
customers
  that photofinishers are like hairstylists (or barbars) in that if you
find
  someone that does a good job, stick with them. If William Robb's Walmart
 was
  near me, I'd be sorely tempted to get my 4x6's done there because it's
 obvious
  that he cares, and he's got a killer price. That's an amazing combo, but
  unfortuenetly, it's all too rare. Most of the time, I get what I pay
for.
 Most
  places use similar (in capabilities) machines, even the pro labs for
 4x6's.
  The difference comes down to who is using and maintaining them...
 
  Isaac
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Photofinishing

2001-12-06 Thread William Robb

- Original Message -
From: aimcompute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: Photofinishing


 I'm always a little wary taking negative film down to the
drugstore and
 having a 19 year old girl do the processing while talking to
her boyfriend
 on the cell phone.


The thing is, any lab, no matter how good can dissapoint. We do
excellent proofing from 35mm, so,so from APS and our 110 is
pretty spotty. We have limited ability to do cropping on 35mm.
However, the nature of our position in the marketplace is that
we don't do much else.
Fortunately, there are a few very good custom labs in town that
I can send people to when something is out of our league.
The pro lab I used to work front end for was staffed by
nincompoops. The E-6 line was good, but nothing else coming out
of the lab was worthy of the name pro. The attitude was so,
where else are they going to go, we are the only game in town.
They closed shortly after Don's Photo opened.
It is still a people driven business. If the lab has good people
who care, they will turn out a good product, within the
limitations of the equipment. If the lab has people who don't
care, the lab will turn out crap, no matter what they have in
the back for production.
My experience has been that the difference between an amateur
lab  and a pro one is potential capabilities more than realized
ones.
Isaac's comments, quoted below are right on target.
William Robb

 Tom C.

 - Original Message -
 From: Isaac Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:27 AM
 Subject: Photofinishing


  There has been some disparaging words here about cheap
 photofinishing vs
  a pro lab, and I'd just like to put in my two cents... I
work at a place
  that prices itself between places like Walmart and the
various custom labs
  around here. While its true that in general we produce with
more
 consistancy
  than places like Walmart and Eckerd's, that isn't always the
rule. What I
 have
  found to be the key issue is wheather the people running the
lab care
 about
  what they are doing moreso than where they are. I always
tell my customers
  that photofinishers are like hairstylists (or barbars) in
that if you find
  someone that does a good job, stick with them. If William
Robb's Walmart
 was
  near me, I'd be sorely tempted to get my 4x6's done there
because it's
 obvious
  that he cares, and he's got a killer price. That's an
amazing combo, but
  unfortuenetly, it's all too rare. Most of the time, I get
what I pay for.
 Most
  places use similar (in capabilities) machines, even the
pro labs for
 4x6's.
  The difference comes down to who is using and maintaining
them...
 
  Isaac
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Photofinishing

2001-12-06 Thread Matamoros, Cesar A.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Photofinishing


In a message dated 12/6/01 10:35:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

writes:
 even the pro labs for 4x6's

Isaac, my pro lab turns out 3.5 x 5.something standard prints. 
~IF~ you want 4 x 6 prints you pay more. Remember that's ~my~ pro lab. 

Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Interesting.  My pro lab charges the same for 3.5 x 5 and 4 x 6
prints.  It actually takes more work for them to do the 3.5.  I am not
familiar with labs and just assumed that the 3.5 x 5 was a 'cut' version of
the 4 x 6.

Cesar Matamoros II
Panama City, Florida
in Baltimore, Maryland
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Photofinishing

2001-12-06 Thread William Robb

- Original Message -
From: Matamoros, Cesar A.
Subject: RE: Photofinishing



 Interesting.  My pro lab charges the same for 3.5 x 5 and 4
x 6
 prints.  It actually takes more work for them to do the 3.5.
I am not
 familiar with labs and just assumed that the 3.5 x 5 was a
'cut' version of
 the 4 x 6.


Depending on the volume of 4R (4x6) prints to 3R (3.5 x 5)
prints, many labs (mine included) print 3R on 4 inch paper, then
hand trim the prints to size.
If the volume warranted, we would go to 5 inch paper for doing
3R prints.
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Photofinishing

2001-12-06 Thread Alan Chan

Quite true. If the person who did the processing and printng didn't care, 
one shouldn't expect good result. Just like one of my local lab which was 
once excellent, but now (newly employed printer) they scratched every film 
that I gave them, and white spots on at least 1/3 of all prints. They aren't 
cheap either. Even though they were willing to do the reprint without 
questions, I was sick of myself to go back and ask for reprints everytime. 
They have not improved their QC after my countless complaints. Just too much 
hassle.

regards,
Alan Chan

 There has been some disparaging words here about cheap 
photofinishing vs
a pro lab, and I'd just like to put in my two cents... I work at a place
that prices itself between places like Walmart and the various custom labs
around here. While its true that in general we produce with more 
consistancy
than places like Walmart and Eckerd's, that isn't always the rule. What I 
have
found to be the key issue is wheather the people running the lab care about
what they are doing moreso than where they are. I always tell my customers
that photofinishers are like hairstylists (or barbars) in that if you find
someone that does a good job, stick with them. If William Robb's Walmart 
was
near me, I'd be sorely tempted to get my 4x6's done there because it's 
obvious
that he cares, and he's got a killer price. That's an amazing combo, but
unfortuenetly, it's all too rare. Most of the time, I get what I pay for. 
Most
places use similar (in capabilities) machines, even the pro labs for 
4x6's.
The difference comes down to who is using and maintaining them...

Isaac


_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Photofinishing

2001-12-06 Thread Matamoros, Cesar A.

-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Photofinishing


- Original Message -
From: Matamoros, Cesar A.
Subject: RE: Photofinishing



 Interesting.  My pro lab charges the same for 3.5 x 5 and 4
x 6
 prints.  It actually takes more work for them to do the 3.5.
I am not
 familiar with labs and just assumed that the 3.5 x 5 was a
'cut' version of
 the 4 x 6.


Depending on the volume of 4R (4x6) prints to 3R (3.5 x 5)
prints, many labs (mine included) print 3R on 4 inch paper, then
hand trim the prints to size.
If the volume warranted, we would go to 5 inch paper for doing
3R prints.
William Robb
-
 Just wanted to say thank you for clearing that up for me.  Maybe next time
I am in the store I can talk my way into a tour :-)

Cesar 
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Photofinishing

2001-12-06 Thread William Robb

- Original Message -
From: Matamoros, Cesar A.
 -
  Just wanted to say thank you for clearing that up for me.
Maybe next time
 I am in the store I can talk my way into a tour :-)

Heck, we are just a hole in the Wal~Mart kiosk.G
Get a tour through a real lab sometime.
It is quite impressive to see what a full service lab like the
one I used to work at is capable of. We had E-6, C-41 and black
and white up to 4x5. We had half a dozen Lucht printers for pro
proofing, and 2 Gretag 3140s for amateur and 35mm proofing. We
had a full art department for retouching and also dry mount and
texturing up to 40 x 60 inch, which was the largest print size
we offered.
The copy room used Mamiya 6x7 and Linhof 4x5 for producing copy
negatives. We did not produce 35mm copy negs at all.
I enjoyed those days immensely, but unfortunately, the
photographic market here is not large enough to support that
type of facility anymore.
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




RE: Photofinishing

2001-12-06 Thread Matamoros, Cesar A.

-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Photofinishing


- Original Message -
From: Matamoros, Cesar A.
 -
  Just wanted to say thank you for clearing that up for me.
Maybe next time
 I am in the store I can talk my way into a tour :-)

Heck, we are just a hole in the Wal~Mart kiosk.G
Get a tour through a real lab sometime.
It is quite impressive to see what a full service lab like the
one I used to work at is capable of. We had E-6, C-41 and black
and white up to 4x5. We had half a dozen Lucht printers for pro
proofing, and 2 Gretag 3140s for amateur and 35mm proofing. We
had a full art department for retouching and also dry mount and
texturing up to 40 x 60 inch, which was the largest print size
we offered.
The copy room used Mamiya 6x7 and Linhof 4x5 for producing copy
negatives. We did not produce 35mm copy negs at all.
I enjoyed those days immensely, but unfortunately, the
photographic market here is not large enough to support that
type of facility anymore.
William Robb

William,

I will take a tour there too.  I meant that I would tour 'my' lab
back home.  I have walked back there enough.  The owner was even  showing
off some Epson commercial printer they got in while I was on vacation that
is limited in length only by the roll of paper left feeding the machine.

They do prints, both bw and color, and slide processing.  They also
do medium format.  They do enlargements to a particular size.  

[Side note - my friend 'borrowed' my slide (without my knowledge) that I
took of the WTC on 7 Sept. to make a large print for my birthday from a scan
of the slide - great job!]  

I definitely consider them 'pro' in that they care about their work
and take pride in having a happy customer leave and return for more
business.  I would hate to think what it would be like without them.  I have
gotten lost in the back with all the machines surrounding me.  I have sent a
few friends there and they have all commented that it was more expensive for
processing, but they could tell the difference. 

Cesar Matamoros II
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .