Alexander, You are right. That is a good idea and would provide some (which is more than I have now!) albeit limited functionality. Given the length of the distance between the bottom of where the lens attaches and the base of the camera (even w/o the BG-10), this would allow moving the back portion of the bellows a distance that corresponds to the distance the extension ring extends beyond the rear portion of the rail of the bellows.
I will try this with the Auto Bellow and post the results. Jason Alexander, You are probably right. I just don't have any tubes hanging around. maybe I'll have to pick one up now. Bruce Monday, January 28, 2002, 11:23:39 AM, you wrote: AK> Bruce wrote: AK> "2) I have the Pentax Auto Bellows A and I can report AK> that the MZ-S does not mate to it. The base of the AK> camera (no BG-10) hits into the frame of the bellows AK> and won't allow a solid mating. I don't know if AK> there are any 3rd party bellows that would work." AK> Insert a narrow extension ring between body and AK> bellows. AK> Alexander - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
