Re: split negatives
I think the guy might be onto something. If you buy one of my prints, I'll give you a corrupted .PEF, containing only one fourth of the data of the image. :) On 9/7/05, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I dunno about this. The Australian term is wanky. Photographer makes 5 > prints from a negative. Then cuts the neg in quarters, and 4 of the > prints are sold, each with one of the quarters, to ensure that the print > is truly limited. Beside the fact that you still have to take his word > that he only makes 5 prints, I can't see how destroying the negative > makes the photos any better. Don't get me wrong, they aren't bad photos > - a bit bland, but nothing really wrong with them. At least he doesn't > photoshop the results :) > > (warning, "artistic nudes" ahead) > http://www.nad-iksodas.com/split.htm > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc > > -- Juan Buhler http://www.jbuhler.com photoblog at http://photoblog.jbuhler.com
Re: split negatives
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote: What brand camera is "**pples"? It does not matter, it has gaffer tape all over the logos. Kostas
Re: split negatives
What brand camera is "**pples"? Shel > [Original Message] > From: Pancho Hasselbach > hurt as much as what one of the models has had done to her **pples...
RE: split negatives
Pretentious nonsense. -- Cheers, Bob > -Original Message- > From: Derby Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 07 September 2005 12:16 > To: Pentax Discuss > Subject: split negatives > > > I dunno about this. The Australian term is wanky. > Photographer makes 5 prints from a negative. Then cuts the > neg in quarters, and 4 of the prints are sold, each with one > of the quarters, to ensure that the print is truly limited. > Beside the fact that you still have to take his word that he > only makes 5 prints, I can't see how destroying the negative > makes the photos any better. Don't get me wrong, they aren't > bad photos > - a bit bland, but nothing really wrong with them. At least > he doesn't photoshop the results :) > > (warning, "artistic nudes" ahead) > http://www.nad-iksodas.com/split.htm > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc > > > >
Re: split negatives
Well, rather a marketing gag than anything else, I think. I don't know if I wold aim at that kind of collectors - "look, I've got the _proof_ that I have a (nearly) unique picture of a naked woman!" - hehehe... This won't make his photography better nor worse. Mostly harmless, cutting innocent negs with a pair of scissors doesnt't hurt as much as what one of the models has had done to her **pples... Just my 2c, Pancho Derby Chang schrieb: I dunno about this. The Australian term is wanky. Photographer makes 5 prints from a negative. Then cuts the neg in quarters, and 4 of the prints are sold, each with one of the quarters, to ensure that the print is truly limited. Beside the fact that you still have to take his word that he only makes 5 prints, I can't see how destroying the negative makes the photos any better. Don't get me wrong, they aren't bad photos - a bit bland, but nothing really wrong with them. At least he doesn't photoshop the results :) (warning, "artistic nudes" ahead) http://www.nad-iksodas.com/split.htm
Re: split negatives
On 7/9/05, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed: > >I dunno about this. The Australian term is wanky. Photographer makes 5 >prints from a negative. Then cuts the neg in quarters, and 4 of the >prints are sold, each with one of the quarters, to ensure that the print >is truly limited. Beside the fact that you still have to take his word >that he only makes 5 prints, I can't see how destroying the negative >makes the photos any better. Don't get me wrong, they aren't bad photos >- a bit bland, but nothing really wrong with them. At least he doesn't >photoshop the results :) > >(warning, "artistic nudes" ahead) >http://www.nad-iksodas.com/split.htm What's to stop him from rattling off a dozen shots per setup, or even a dozen rolls for that matter. What pretentious nonesense. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _
Re: split negatives
> > From: Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/09/07 Wed AM 11:15:50 GMT > To: Pentax Discuss > Subject: split negatives > > > I dunno about this. The Australian term is wanky. Photographer makes 5 > prints from a negative. Then cuts the neg in quarters, and 4 of the > prints are sold, each with one of the quarters, to ensure that the print > is truly limited. Beside the fact that you still have to take his word > that he only makes 5 prints, I can't see how destroying the negative > makes the photos any better. Don't get me wrong, they aren't bad photos > - a bit bland, but nothing really wrong with them. At least he doesn't > photoshop the results :) > > (warning, "artistic nudes" ahead) > http://www.nad-iksodas.com/split.htm > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc Reduces the chance of someone running off scans, I suppose - the four original owners would not want to harm their investments. 8-) - Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
