Re: "Photo-plagiarism"

2004-01-09 Thread Scott Nelson
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 21:58, Naomi van der Lippe wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> Hope all the New Year's resolutions are holding up!
> 
> I have seen a photo in a pamphlet on photography which I would like to
> re-create and, if successful, to display on PUG sometime.  Would this not be
> seen as "photo-plagiarism"?  I have seen zillions of beautiful photo's which
> I would love to try however I am always concern about the consequences.
> 
> How do you guys feel about this?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Naomi
> 
> **
> Everything in this e-mail and attachments relating to the official business of 
> MultiChoice Africa is proprietary to 
> the company. Any view or opinion expressed in this message may be the view of the 
> individual and should not automatically 
> be ascribed to the company.  If you are not the intended recipient, you may not 
> peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or 
> copy this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the 
> sender immediately by email, facsimile 
> or telephone and destroy the original message.
> **
> 

Technically this is not plagarism (in the legal sense) as long as you
don't try to pass off your work as being made by the original author. 
You are not strictly copying another's work, merely reproducing it.  I
also believe it is ok for a painter to make a copy of someone else's
painting (i.e. the Mona Lisa) as long as said painter doesn't claim the
painting is the original Mona Lisa by Leonardo Davinci.  It is
impossible to reproduce a photo exactly, so go ahead and make your best
go at it.

-Scott



Re: "Photo-plagiarism"

2004-01-08 Thread William Robb

- Original Message - 
From: "Naomi van der Lippe"
Subject: "Photo-plagiarism"


> Hi all
>
> Hope all the New Year's resolutions are holding up!
>
> I have seen a photo in a pamphlet on photography which I would like to
> re-create and, if successful, to display on PUG sometime.  Would this not
be
> seen as "photo-plagiarism"?  I have seen zillions of beautiful photo's
which
> I would love to try however I am always concern about the consequences.
>
> How do you guys feel about this?

The only way I can take a good photo is to copy someone elses ideas.

William Robb



Re: "Photo-plagiarism"

2004-01-07 Thread mapson

re-create and, if successful, to display on PUG sometime.  Would this not be
seen as "photo-plagiarism"?  I have seen zillions of beautiful photo's which
I would love to try however I am always concern about the consequences.
How do you guys feel about this?

Regards

Naomi


This would be another of my suggestions for PUG. Let's select a photo that, 
theoretically, all of us could shoot (not underwater, walking on the moon 
or using a high-powered microscope). But for example a night street with 
light trails, candid through the branches of a tree, water reflection or 
whatever else. The photo should be such that wherever we are we can 
're-create' it, however it cannot be done at the same spot as the original. 
And then it would be interesting to see how many very different versions of 
that one photo we could come up with.

What do you think?

   (*)o(*) 
Robert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: "Photo-plagiarism"

2004-01-07 Thread Shel Belinkoff
We are all "photo plagiarists" to some degree.  If you see a photo that incites your 
creativity, go ahead and try to make your
own version of it, or use it as an inspiration to create something even more your own. 
 It's hard to know where one's creative
spirit comes from ... some time ago I made a photo of a couple of cars in a field.  A 
few days later a friend showed me a
photo made by W. Eugene Smith, who, incidentally, is one of my favorite photographers, 
that was clearly a precedent to mine.
I suppose ... can't say for sure, but it seems likely ... that Smith's work influenced 
my vision, and maybe i never would have
seen my photo had i not seen his years before.

shel belinkoff

Naomi van der Lippe wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Hope all the New Year's resolutions are holding up!
>
> I have seen a photo in a pamphlet on photography which I would like to
> re-create and, if successful, to display on PUG sometime.  Would this not be
> seen as "photo-plagiarism"?  I have seen zillions of beautiful photo's which
> I would love to try however I am always concern about the consequences.
>
> How do you guys feel about this?