Re: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities
- Original Message - From: "Chris Brogden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 3:43 AM Subject: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities Hello Chris My vote: In order to make it easy to communicate with someone in a particular location, you have to include the e-mail addresses. In my opinion there is no difference if you will post it here for all or if you put it as a direct mail to me and the others all. Please excuse me, I have some arguments pro, but my English is too bad ... Kristian-Heinrich from Black Forest / Germany - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities
I really do not care one way or the other regarding email addresses. Somehow, mine seems to get picked up and I do get a small amount of spam, but nothing that a flick of the delete key can't handle. John - Original Message - From: "Chris Brogden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 8:43 PM Subject: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities > Do people care about this? What are your feeling regarding e-mail > addresses or no e-mail addresses? The way I see it, if the majority of > people don't see a need to include e-mail addys, then we can put it on a > web page easily enough. If they do, then it should stay as direct > mail. Any thoughts, people? > > chris > > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities
on 2/14/01 8:43 PM, Chris Brogden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I considered posting the info without e-mail addresses, but thought that > part of the point was to make it easy to communicate with someone in a > particular location. If I don't include the e-mail addresses, then people > will have to post requests for communication to the list, which is bound > to piss people off as well if it starts happening too much. > Chris, As long as the address list is being emailed to other members who sent in the info I don't see a problem. If some has a problem the can let you know and you can delete them from the email list (both on it and receiving the list). JeffW. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Re: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Chris Brogden wrote: > As long as the web address isn't published, but kept confidential in > private replies, Something else I just thought of, Bill. For me, it's no more work to mail out the complete list to everyone than it is to mail out the URL. Same amount of time either way, so I wouldn't be saving any work by putting it on the web. chris - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
