Re: I've made a lens decision

2009-08-02 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Cory Waterscbwat...@bellsouth.net wrote:

 I have decided that for walking around at a place like Disney World with your 
 family taking those sorts of snapshots, you need to have a lens like a 
 28-200.  ...

Me, I'd go with a normal or short portrait tele lens, f/2.8 or faster.
But thats me. ;-)

-- 
Godfrey
  www.gdgphoto.com
  www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto
  www.twitter.com/godfreydigiorgi

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I've made a lens decision

2009-08-01 Thread Joseph McAllister

On Aug 1, 2009, at 13:35 , Cory Waters wrote:

I have decided that for walking around at a place like Disney World  
with your family taking those sorts of snapshots, you need to have a  
lens like a 28-200.  I'm willing to sacrifice the perceived loss of  
tack-sharp or fantastic image quality whatever to have one fairly  
compact lens that has the wide focal range that I really want on  
days like these.  I've been carrying the 16-50 and the 50-200 but  
changing lenses is such a bother when you have all this other gack  
we're carrying through the parks.


CW



DA 18-250 — a little bigger, heavier, and you have to keep the creep  
lock locked until you up it to your face, but MUCH more versatile on  
the wide end (think 27mm vs 42mm)


Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com

There is no off position to the genius switch.
Genius can, however, be observed as insanity.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I've made a lens decision

2009-08-01 Thread Thibouille
The 18-250 is available in both Tamron and Pentax brands.
The only differences are look and probably in K-7 case, auto CA etc. correction.
This zoom is also well known as being pretty damn good for what it is
(a do it all lens).

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Joseph McAllisterpentax...@mac.com wrote:
 On Aug 1, 2009, at 13:35 , Cory Waters wrote:

 I have decided that for walking around at a place like Disney World with
 your family taking those sorts of snapshots, you need to have a lens like a
 28-200.  I'm willing to sacrifice the perceived loss of tack-sharp or
 fantastic image quality whatever to have one fairly compact lens that has
 the wide focal range that I really want on days like these.  I've been
 carrying the 16-50 and the 50-200 but changing lenses is such a bother when
 you have all this other gack we're carrying through the parks.

 CW


 DA 18-250 — a little bigger, heavier, and you have to keep the creep lock
 locked until you up it to your face, but MUCH more versatile on the wide end
 (think 27mm vs 42mm)

 Joseph McAllister
 pentax...@mac.com

 There is no off position to the genius switch.
 Genius can, however, be observed as insanity.


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.




-- 
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I've made a lens decision

2009-08-01 Thread Brian Walters
I came to a similar conclusion a few months ago and, after getting some
suggestions here, I picked up a Sigma 18-125 f3.5-5.5 DC at a good price
on EBay.  I haven't regretted the purchase.

Maybe a bit short on the long end for what you want but as a 'go
anywhere' lens it's quite good.



Cheers

Brian

++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/




On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 13:35 -0700, Cory Waters cbwat...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
 
 I have decided that for walking around at a place like Disney World with
 your family taking those sorts of snapshots, you need to have a lens like
 a 28-200.  I'm willing to sacrifice the perceived loss of tack-sharp or
 fantastic image quality whatever to have one fairly compact lens that has
 the wide focal range that I really want on days like these.  I've been
 carrying the 16-50 and the 50-200 but changing lenses is such a bother
 when you have all this other gack we're carrying through the parks.
 
 CW
 
 
-- 


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - The professional email service


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I've made a lens decision

2009-08-01 Thread John Sessoms

From: Thibouille

The 18-250 is available in both Tamron and Pentax brands.
The only differences are look and probably in K-7 case, auto CA etc. correction.
This zoom is also well known as being pretty damn good for what it is
(a do it all lens).

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Joseph McAllisterpentax...@mac.com wrote:

 On Aug 1, 2009, at 13:35 , Cory Waters wrote:


 I have decided that for walking around at a place like Disney World with
 your family taking those sorts of snapshots, you need to have a lens like a
 28-200. ?I'm willing to sacrifice the perceived loss of tack-sharp or
 fantastic image quality whatever to have one fairly compact lens that has
 the wide focal range that I really want on days like these. ?I've been
 carrying the 16-50 and the 50-200 but changing lenses is such a bother when
 you have all this other gack we're carrying through the parks.

 CW



 DA 18-250 ? a little bigger, heavier, and you have to keep the creep lock
 locked until you up it to your face, but MUCH more versatile on the wide end
 (think 27mm vs 42mm)



I have a Tamron 28-200 that is just a terrible lens.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: I've made a lens decision

2009-08-01 Thread J.C. O'Connell
for places like disney world a good quality
PS digital is probably easier than a DSLR.

--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Home Page - www.jchriso.com
Join the Audio CD PLAYER DISCUSSION list - 
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/ 


-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
John Sessoms
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2009 6:36 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: I've made a lens decision


From: Thibouille
 The 18-250 is available in both Tamron and Pentax brands.
 The only differences are look and probably in K-7 case, auto CA etc. 
 correction. This zoom is also well known as being pretty damn good for

 what it is (a do it all lens).
 
 On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Joseph McAllisterpentax...@mac.com 
 wrote:
  On Aug 1, 2009, at 13:35 , Cory Waters wrote:
 
  I have decided that for walking around at a place like Disney 
  World with your family taking those sorts of snapshots, you need 
  to have a lens like a 28-200. ?I'm willing to sacrifice the 
  perceived loss of tack-sharp or fantastic image quality whatever 
  to have one fairly compact lens that has the wide focal range 
  that I really want on days like these. ?I've been carrying the 
  16-50 and the 50-200 but changing lenses is such a bother when 
  you have all this other gack we're carrying through the parks.
 
  CW
 
 
  DA 18-250 ? a little bigger, heavier, and you have to keep the 
  creep lock locked until you up it to your face, but MUCH more 
  versatile on the wide end (think 27mm vs 42mm)
 

I have a Tamron 28-200 that is just a terrible lens.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I've made a lens decision

2009-08-01 Thread Joseph McAllister
It's the lens I used every day until I got the DA* 60-250 for my dog  
park work.


My only complaint was that it didn't focus as well at 250mm, because  
it had gone to ƒ6.7. But that was overcome by using 400 and 800 ISO  
when in shade or cloudy days.



On Aug 1, 2009, at 14:25 , Thibouille wrote:


The 18-250 is available in both Tamron and Pentax brands.
The only differences are look and probably in K-7 case, auto CA etc.  
correction.

This zoom is also well known as being pretty damn good for what it is
(a do it all lens).

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Joseph  
McAllisterpentax...@mac.com wrote:

On Aug 1, 2009, at 13:35 , Cory Waters wrote:

I have decided that for walking around at a place like Disney  
World with
your family taking those sorts of snapshots, you need to have a  
lens like a
28-200.  I'm willing to sacrifice the perceived loss of tack-sharp  
or
fantastic image quality whatever to have one fairly compact lens  
that has
the wide focal range that I really want on days like these.  I've  
been
carrying the 16-50 and the 50-200 but changing lenses is such a  
bother when

you have all this other gack we're carrying through the parks.

CW



DA 18-250 — a little bigger, heavier, and you have to keep the  
creep lock
locked until you up it to your face, but MUCH more versatile on the  
wide end

(think 27mm vs 42mm)


Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com

“ It is still true, as was first said many years ago, that people are  
the only sophisticated computing devices that can be made at low cost  
by unskilled workers!”

— Martin G. Wolf, PhD


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I've made a lens decision

2009-08-01 Thread Joseph McAllister

On Aug 1, 2009, at 15:38 , J.C. O'Connell wrote:


for places like disney world a good quality
PS digital is probably easier than a DSLR.


Poobah. You would not look at all 'cool' enough.

Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com

There is no off position to the genius switch.
Genius can, however, be observed as insanity.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I've made a lens decision

2009-08-01 Thread Keith Whaley

Cory Waters wrote:

I have decided that for walking around at a place like Disney World
with your family taking those sorts of snapshots, you need to have a
lens like a 28-200.  I'm willing to sacrifice the perceived loss of
tack-sharp or fantastic image quality whatever to have one fairly
compact lens that has the wide focal range that I really want on days
like these.  I've been carrying the 16-50 and the 50-200 but changing
lenses is such a bother when you have all this other gack we're
carrying through the parks.

CW


Something like a C-8080?

keith whaley

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I've made a lens decision

2009-08-01 Thread Cory Waters

Yes, 28 is way too long for what I might need out in the bush.  
what was I thinking?
CW



- Original Message 
From: Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, August 1, 2009 5:16:26 PM
Subject: Re: I've made a lens decision

On Aug 1, 2009, at 13:35 , Cory Waters wrote:

 I have decided that for walking around at a place like Disney World with your 
 family taking those sorts of snapshots, you need to have a lens like a 
 28-200.  I'm willing to sacrifice the perceived loss of tack-sharp or 
 fantastic image quality whatever to have one fairly compact lens that has the 
 wide focal range that I really want on days like these.  I've been carrying 
 the 16-50 and the 50-200 but changing lenses is such a bother when you have 
 all this other gack we're carrying through the parks.
 
 CW


DA 18-250 — a little bigger, heavier, and you have to keep the creep lock 
locked until you up it to your face, but MUCH more versatile on the wide end 
(think 27mm vs 42mm)

Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com

There is no off position to the genius switch.
Genius can, however, be observed as insanity.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: I've made a lens decision

2009-08-01 Thread Desjardins, Steve
For this exact same situation, I like the analog of a 28-90 for 35mm.   
I'll give up the reach for the weight reduction.  I bet I could live  
with just a 18-55 kit zoom for walk around snaps.

Steve Desjardins

On Aug 1, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Cory Waters cbwat...@bellsouth.net  
wrote:


 I have decided that for walking around at a place like Disney World  
 with your family taking those sorts of snapshots, you need to have a  
 lens like a 28-200.  I'm willing to sacrifice the perceived loss of  
 tack-sharp or fantastic image quality whatever to have one fairly  
 compact lens that has the wide focal range that I really want on  
 days like these.  I've been carrying the 16-50 and the 50-200 but  
 changing lenses is such a bother when you have all this other gack  
 we're carrying through the parks.

 CW


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above  
 and follow the directions.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I've made a lens decision

2009-08-01 Thread Larry Colen
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 06:36:22PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
 
 I have a Tamron 28-200 that is just a terrible lens.

It was one of the first, if not the first, lens I bought for my
K100. I picked it up at BH for a lot less than I expected. After I
got my 18-250, I was having problems with the 18-250 misreading the
focal length and had to send it in for repair. The 28-200 was so bad I
used the Pentax 28-80 I had gotten in the meantime and would crop
rather than use the 28-200.

I'm very happy with the 18-250 as a ready for anything lens.


-- 
The first step is learning to take great photos, 
the second step is learning to throw away ones that are merely good.
Larry Colen l...@red4est.comhttp://www.red4est.com/lrc


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: I've made a lens decision

2009-08-01 Thread P. J. Alling
I shot and posted this a couple of days ago.  The Pentax version isn't 
that horrible.


http://files.getdropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20tutu.html

I still want to replace my two zoom kit with something better, because 
of it. but in bright light so you can stop down a bit it's not that bad 
in a pinch.


Larry Colen wrote:

On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 06:36:22PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
  

I have a Tamron 28-200 that is just a terrible lens.



It was one of the first, if not the first, lens I bought for my
K100. I picked it up at BH for a lot less than I expected. After I
got my 18-250, I was having problems with the 18-250 misreading the
focal length and had to send it in for repair. The 28-200 was so bad I
used the Pentax 28-80 I had gotten in the meantime and would crop
rather than use the 28-200.

I'm very happy with the 18-250 as a ready for anything lens.


  



--


The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or 
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn 
fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a 
free man any more than a dog.

--G. K. Chesterton


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: I've made a lens decision

2009-08-01 Thread J.C. O'Connell
The problem with most of those extended zoom
range zoom lenses is that they do a lot of
things OK, but nothing really well. They also tend
to be slow and have more geometric distortion/flare
than moderate zooms or primes. They are good
for grab shots when you really don't know what
to expect and don't/wont have time to change lenses,
but other than that, I don't want to use one
when I do have the time to change lenses
for the reasons mentioned above. I mean, if they
were really as good as a pair of moderate zooms or
several primes, they would have all taken over
the world by now and they certainly havent (yet).

--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Home Page - www.jchriso.com
Join the Audio CD PLAYER DISCUSSION list - 
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/ 


-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
P. J. Alling
Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 1:04 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: I've made a lens decision


I shot and posted this a couple of days ago.  The Pentax version isn't 
that horrible.

http://files.getdropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20tutu.html

 I still want to replace my two zoom kit with something better, because 
of it. but in bright light so you can stop down a bit it's not that bad 
in a pinch.

Larry Colen wrote:
 On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 06:36:22PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
   
 I have a Tamron 28-200 that is just a terrible lens.
 

 It was one of the first, if not the first, lens I bought for my K100. 
 I picked it up at BH for a lot less than I expected. After I got my 
 18-250, I was having problems with the 18-250 misreading the focal 
 length and had to send it in for repair. The 28-200 was so bad I used 
 the Pentax 28-80 I had gotten in the meantime and would crop rather 
 than use the 28-200.

 I'm very happy with the 18-250 as a ready for anything lens.


   


-- 


The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly
a damn fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not,
he is not a free man any more than a dog.

--G. K. Chesterton


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.