Re: OT: Manfrotto tripod mini-report

2003-01-07 Thread Stan Halpin
Not so bad here yet. In the whole region they are making comparisons to the
Dust Bowl disaster of the 1930's. We had well below normal rainfall this
year, mostly coming last spring (March-April). The winter wheat has been
planted, it will need some snow cover soon, and then some significant rain
this spring . . .

stan

on 1/07/03 10:11 PM, Shaun Canning at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 How do you define a drought Stan? We have had consistently below average
 rainfall for 6 years, and are in the midst of the worst drought in
 recorded history (and it appears to be getting worse, if that's
 possible). We have farmers in the family, and believe me they are
 stuffed
 
 Cheers
 
 Shaun
 
 Stan Halpin wrote:
 I enjoyed the pictures. Bittersweet enjoyment. Memories of the 1993 floods
 here, the all-nighters filling sandbags in a futile attempt to protect
 homes, the stench of mud in the homes we helped to clean up later, the soggy
 photo albums and other irreplaceable treasures. . . And now we are in the
 midst of a drought, and with only a trace of moisture in the last 2 months
 or so . . .
 
 Reminds me of the classic discussion of (bad) statistics, averages in
 particular. Guy has one had in freezing salt water, the other hand in a pot
 of boiling water.
 On average he is comfortable.
 On average, the weather is fine.
 
 Are you still above water?
 
 stan
 
 on 1/05/03 3:51 PM, Cotty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 The last few days have seen us holding our breath near the River Thames
 (pronounced Temz) on the outskirts of Oxford, England. Extremely heavy
 rain last week means the river is now flooding, and within yards of our
 back door. The water table is so high that the garden is flooded, with no
 direct access by the river! With high pressure now keeping precipitation
 at bay, the sun was out with icy temperatures of just above freezing.
 
 What better conditions to tempt me out to have a go with my new Manfrotto
 190 tripod. Suiting up for cold and water, the rest of the family wanted
 to join in. The Mrs managed to dig out her MX loaded with Delta 400 and
 placed the SMC 35mm 2.8 on the front. My son Stefan resisted all attempts
 to get him to bring his Z-10. Considering he spent the time smashing his
 wellies through ice-covered fields, perhaps no bad thing.
 
 My Manfrotto is the 190 CL B, which means that it's one up from the
 bog-standard 190, but nowhere near as grandiose as the PRO or the NAT.
 (ref:
 
 http://www.warehouseexpress.com/BINSSCOPES/TRIPODS/manfrotto.html
 
 for reasonable definitions). However, it suits my needs very well. Not as
 heavy as the 055, I feel I can carry it all day. I now have the 486RC2
 ball head which is a decent size and provides very secure and positive
 locking. Complete with quick release mechanism made of sturdy metal, it
 felt very capable and at no time was I concerned with losing the camera
 and lens into the drink between shots.
 
 The legs are straightforward circular with secure clamps that take a fair
 amount of effort to unlock, but happily snap shut quickly and securely. A
 fast system of allowing the legs to move right through 90 degrees with a
 single lever push (per leg) means that any terrain can be accommodated.
 The centre column is triangular and will not rotate in situ. It is
 reversible.  The feet are rubber slip-ons and in an ideal world,
 adjustable rubber/spikes (as on the NAT) would ensure stability on any
 surface. I'm more of the school that believes in jamming the thing home
 as far as possible. In icy, wet, muddy grass, either foot would do. The
 whole thing looks very posh in black (190 CL B).
 
 I wanted something light enough to carry all day, strong enough for my
 camera/lens weight (Pentax MX / Canon D60), and most importantly, fast
 and easy to use (with gloves), and no fiddly bits of any kind. I'm really
 happy with the Manfrotto and heartily recommend it.
 
 Three results from an hour's stroll through icy water:
 
 http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/landscapes/images/pic31.html
 
 http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/landscapes/images/pic32.html
 
 http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/landscapes/images/pic33.html
 
 Cheerio,
 
 Cotty
 
 
 Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
 http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
 
 Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
 http://www.macads.co.uk/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 .
 
 




Re: OT: Manfrotto tripod mini-report

2003-01-07 Thread Shaun Canning
Winter wheat crop? That implies that you are getting 2 crops per 
yearwe're lucky to get one a year in a normal season, let alone the 
way things are at the moment. The Australian grain harvest is expected 
to be down by about 50-60% this year alone. Same will happen to the live 
meat exports.

Cheers

Shaun

Stan Halpin wrote:
Not so bad here yet. In the whole region they are making comparisons to the
Dust Bowl disaster of the 1930's. We had well below normal rainfall this
year, mostly coming last spring (March-April). The winter wheat has been
planted, it will need some snow cover soon, and then some significant rain
this spring . . .

stan

on 1/07/03 10:11 PM, Shaun Canning at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



How do you define a drought Stan? We have had consistently below average
rainfall for 6 years, and are in the midst of the worst drought in
recorded history (and it appears to be getting worse, if that's
possible). We have farmers in the family, and believe me they are
stuffed

Cheers

Shaun

Stan Halpin wrote:


I enjoyed the pictures. Bittersweet enjoyment. Memories of the 1993 floods
here, the all-nighters filling sandbags in a futile attempt to protect
homes, the stench of mud in the homes we helped to clean up later, the soggy
photo albums and other irreplaceable treasures. . . And now we are in the
midst of a drought, and with only a trace of moisture in the last 2 months
or so . . .

Reminds me of the classic discussion of (bad) statistics, averages in
particular. Guy has one had in freezing salt water, the other hand in a pot
of boiling water.
On average he is comfortable.
On average, the weather is fine.

Are you still above water?

stan

on 1/05/03 3:51 PM, Cotty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




The last few days have seen us holding our breath near the River Thames
(pronounced Temz) on the outskirts of Oxford, England. Extremely heavy
rain last week means the river is now flooding, and within yards of our
back door. The water table is so high that the garden is flooded, with no
direct access by the river! With high pressure now keeping precipitation
at bay, the sun was out with icy temperatures of just above freezing.

What better conditions to tempt me out to have a go with my new Manfrotto
190 tripod. Suiting up for cold and water, the rest of the family wanted
to join in. The Mrs managed to dig out her MX loaded with Delta 400 and
placed the SMC 35mm 2.8 on the front. My son Stefan resisted all attempts
to get him to bring his Z-10. Considering he spent the time smashing his
wellies through ice-covered fields, perhaps no bad thing.

My Manfrotto is the 190 CL B, which means that it's one up from the
bog-standard 190, but nowhere near as grandiose as the PRO or the NAT.
(ref:

http://www.warehouseexpress.com/BINSSCOPES/TRIPODS/manfrotto.html

for reasonable definitions). However, it suits my needs very well. Not as
heavy as the 055, I feel I can carry it all day. I now have the 486RC2
ball head which is a decent size and provides very secure and positive
locking. Complete with quick release mechanism made of sturdy metal, it
felt very capable and at no time was I concerned with losing the camera
and lens into the drink between shots.

The legs are straightforward circular with secure clamps that take a fair
amount of effort to unlock, but happily snap shut quickly and securely. A
fast system of allowing the legs to move right through 90 degrees with a
single lever push (per leg) means that any terrain can be accommodated.
The centre column is triangular and will not rotate in situ. It is
reversible.  The feet are rubber slip-ons and in an ideal world,
adjustable rubber/spikes (as on the NAT) would ensure stability on any
surface. I'm more of the school that believes in jamming the thing home
as far as possible. In icy, wet, muddy grass, either foot would do. The
whole thing looks very posh in black (190 CL B).

I wanted something light enough to carry all day, strong enough for my
camera/lens weight (Pentax MX / Canon D60), and most importantly, fast
and easy to use (with gloves), and no fiddly bits of any kind. I'm really
happy with the Manfrotto and heartily recommend it.

Three results from an hour's stroll through icy water:

http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/landscapes/images/pic31.html

http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/landscapes/images/pic32.html

http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/landscapes/images/pic33.html

Cheerio,

Cotty


Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/

Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/







.





.




--

Shaun Canning
Cultural Heritage Services 		
High Street, Broadford,
Victoria, 3658.

www.heritageservices.com.au/

Phone: 0414-967644
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]