Re: PESO - Looking up (side down)
So do I! Just thought it was fun to play with. Rick > On Feb 12, 2018, at 8:55 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: > > agree with Paul > > ann > > On 2/12/2018 1:35 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote: >> That one's nice, too, but I like the first the best. >> >> -p >> >> >> On 2/11/2018 9:36 PM, Rick Womer wrote: >>> The same as the previous photo, inverted for fun: >>> >>> https://www.photo.net/photo/18456655/Looking-Up-side-down >>> >>> Comments? >>> >>> Rick >>> >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - Looking up (side down)
agree with Paul ann On 2/12/2018 1:35 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote: That one's nice, too, but I like the first the best. -p On 2/11/2018 9:36 PM, Rick Womer wrote: The same as the previous photo, inverted for fun: https://www.photo.net/photo/18456655/Looking-Up-side-down Comments? Rick -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - Looking up (side down)
That one's nice, too, but I like the first the best. -p On 2/11/2018 9:36 PM, Rick Womer wrote: The same as the previous photo, inverted for fun: https://www.photo.net/photo/18456655/Looking-Up-side-down Comments? Rick -- Paul Sorenson Studio1941 Sooner or later "different" scares people. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - Looking Up
I like this! Cool interpretation of the MAM. Sorry that I wasn't able to join you. -p On 2/11/2018 3:48 PM, Rick Womer wrote: From our trip to Milwaukee in October, taken at the Museum of Art: https://www.photo.net/photo/18456602/Looking-Up (K-5, DA 17-70) Comments appreciated! Rick -- Paul Sorenson Studio1941 Sooner or later "different" scares people. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - Looking Up
Excellent! Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Rick Womer wrote: > From our trip to Milwaukee in October, taken at the Museum of Art: > > https://www.photo.net/photo/18456602/Looking-Up > > (K-5, DA 17-70) > > Comments appreciated! > > Rick > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso Looking up-looking down
With the planned obsolence and high cost of repair so prevelant in many of todays products, cameras included, it seems like functional product longevity is not as big a factor as it once was. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Darren Addy" Subject: Re: Peso Looking up-looking down Another point of failure? Sure, sort of like electric windows, air conditioning and other options on cars. On balance, it should be up to the consumer whether he wishes to have them or not. Sales figures would determine whether it was worthwhile for a company to offer the option or now. It would certainly be one way of separating your flagship product from the more basic lines (something that Pentax seems to have a problem with, ATTM. The K-500 is hardly different from the K-50, for instance). On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:23 AM, P.J. Alling wrote: Well, convenient as articulating screens are, they just add another point of failure to an already complex device. I can understand why a manufacturer would forgo making models with this feature. On 7/30/2013 12:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: THIS is the reason for articulating LCD screens. I think that if camera companies are going to make duplicate models except for the anti-alias filter then they could also make duplicate models with/without an articulating LCD screen. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David J Brooks wrote: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17480450 The photographer is lying on the ground looking up i assume to try and get all of the CN Tower in the back ground. Dave -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso Looking up-looking down
On 30/07/2013 10:40 AM, Darren Addy wrote: Another point of failure? Sure, sort of like electric windows, air conditioning and other options on cars. On balance, it should be up to the consumer whether he wishes to have them or not. Sales figures would determine whether it was worthwhile for a company to offer the option or now. It would certainly be one way of separating your flagship product from the more basic lines (something that Pentax seems to have a problem with, ATTM. The K-500 is hardly different from the K-50, for instance). On a car, adding power windows, etc is putting options onto the vehicle with no major redesigns. Putting an articulating screen onto a camera is a major redesign of the back of the camera, essentially the manufacturer would be making another camera model which would either pirate sales from the sister model or fall hard in the marketplace. Either way, it will cost the company ROI. Power windows as an option on a vehicle does not have the same effect. bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso Looking up-looking down
hehe - hope she can get up! ann On 7/30/2013 11:16, David J Brooks wrote: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17480450 The photographer is lying on the ground looking up i assume to try and get all of the CN Tower in the back ground. Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso Looking up-looking down
It is, you can always get a Nikon D5100. Pentax chooses not to have that point of failure. Just yesterday I was walking out of a local dry goods emporium when I was almost bowled over by an unhappy customer Kuerig coffee maker clutched to their breast, with murder in their eye, on the way to the complaint department. Pentax probably want's to avoid such scenarios as much as possible. The K500 is a bargain among entry level cameras, you get the full capabilities of the mid level camera for a price closer to that of the most basic Canon Rebel. All you seem to lose is weather sealing. That seems like a good deal, not something to upbraid the company about. On 7/30/2013 12:40 PM, Darren Addy wrote: Another point of failure? Sure, sort of like electric windows, air conditioning and other options on cars. On balance, it should be up to the consumer whether he wishes to have them or not. Sales figures would determine whether it was worthwhile for a company to offer the option or now. It would certainly be one way of separating your flagship product from the more basic lines (something that Pentax seems to have a problem with, ATTM. The K-500 is hardly different from the K-50, for instance). On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:23 AM, P.J. Alling wrote: Well, convenient as articulating screens are, they just add another point of failure to an already complex device. I can understand why a manufacturer would forgo making models with this feature. On 7/30/2013 12:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: THIS is the reason for articulating LCD screens. I think that if camera companies are going to make duplicate models except for the anti-alias filter then they could also make duplicate models with/without an articulating LCD screen. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David J Brooks wrote: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17480450 The photographer is lying on the ground looking up i assume to try and get all of the CN Tower in the back ground. Dave -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- There are two kinds of computer users those who've experienced a hard drive failure, and those that will. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- There are two kinds of computer users those who've experienced a hard drive failure, and those that will. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso Looking up-looking down
EDIT: "or now" should be "or not". On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Darren Addy wrote: > Another point of failure? Sure, sort of like electric windows, air > conditioning and other options on cars. On balance, it should be up to > the consumer whether he wishes to have them or not. Sales figures > would determine whether it was worthwhile for a company to offer the > option or now. It would certainly be one way of separating your > flagship product from the more basic lines (something that Pentax > seems to have a problem with, ATTM. The K-500 is hardly different from > the K-50, for instance). > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:23 AM, P.J. Alling > wrote: >> Well, convenient as articulating screens are, they just add another point of >> failure to an already complex device. I can understand why a manufacturer >> would forgo making models with this feature. >> >> >> On 7/30/2013 12:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: >>> >>> THIS is the reason for articulating LCD screens. I think that if >>> camera companies are going to make duplicate models except for the >>> anti-alias filter then they could also make duplicate models >>> with/without an articulating LCD screen. >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David J Brooks >>> wrote: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17480450 The photographer is lying on the ground looking up i assume to try and get all of the CN Tower in the back ground. Dave -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> There are two kinds of computer users those who've experienced a hard drive >> failure, and those that will. >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > > -- > "Photography is a Bastard left by Science on the Doorstep of Art" - > Peter Galassi -- "Photography is a Bastard left by Science on the Doorstep of Art" - Peter Galassi -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso Looking up-looking down
Another point of failure? Sure, sort of like electric windows, air conditioning and other options on cars. On balance, it should be up to the consumer whether he wishes to have them or not. Sales figures would determine whether it was worthwhile for a company to offer the option or now. It would certainly be one way of separating your flagship product from the more basic lines (something that Pentax seems to have a problem with, ATTM. The K-500 is hardly different from the K-50, for instance). On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:23 AM, P.J. Alling wrote: > Well, convenient as articulating screens are, they just add another point of > failure to an already complex device. I can understand why a manufacturer > would forgo making models with this feature. > > > On 7/30/2013 12:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: >> >> THIS is the reason for articulating LCD screens. I think that if >> camera companies are going to make duplicate models except for the >> anti-alias filter then they could also make duplicate models >> with/without an articulating LCD screen. >> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David J Brooks >> wrote: >>> >>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17480450 >>> >>> The photographer is lying on the ground looking up i assume to try and >>> get all of the CN Tower in the back ground. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> -- >>> Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. >>> www.caughtinmotion.com >>> http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ >>> York Region, Ontario, Canada >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> >> >> > > > -- > There are two kinds of computer users those who've experienced a hard drive > failure, and those that will. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- "Photography is a Bastard left by Science on the Doorstep of Art" - Peter Galassi -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso Looking up-looking down
THIS is the reason for articulating LCD screens. I think that if camera companies are going to make duplicate models except for the anti-alias filter then they could also make duplicate models with/without an articulating LCD screen. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David J Brooks wrote: > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17480450 > > The photographer is lying on the ground looking up i assume to try and > get all of the CN Tower in the back ground. > > Dave > > -- > Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. > www.caughtinmotion.com > http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ > York Region, Ontario, Canada > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- "Photography is a Bastard left by Science on the Doorstep of Art" - Peter Galassi -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso Looking up-looking down
Well, convenient as articulating screens are, they just add another point of failure to an already complex device. I can understand why a manufacturer would forgo making models with this feature. On 7/30/2013 12:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: THIS is the reason for articulating LCD screens. I think that if camera companies are going to make duplicate models except for the anti-alias filter then they could also make duplicate models with/without an articulating LCD screen. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David J Brooks wrote: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17480450 The photographer is lying on the ground looking up i assume to try and get all of the CN Tower in the back ground. Dave -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- There are two kinds of computer users those who've experienced a hard drive failure, and those that will. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO -- Looking Up Stream
and tomorrow we get the snow again I like both of your stream shots, PJ - tranquil and inviting scenes ann P. J. Alling wrote: Another from my not quite spring suite. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20lookingupstream.html Equipment: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax FA 20-35mm f4.0 As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - Looking up
Nice shot. I like it with the plain background like that. Dave Quoting Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. > > Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld > ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm > > Comments welcome > > -- > Bruce > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > Equine Photography in York Region -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Looking up
nice on the exposure. I like the composition, it's very simple. russell On 9/28/06, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. > > Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld > ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm > > Comments welcome > > -- > Bruce > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Looking up
On 9/29/06, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. > > Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld > ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm > Gorgeous! I love the simple, starkness of it. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Looking up
Photographically, I can't fault it, but the subject doesn't do anything for me. Might have more impact if it was B+W? Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: PESO - Looking up > Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. > > Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld > ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm > > Comments welcome > > -- > Bruce > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Looking up
I did play with the sky quite a bit and preferred what is shown. Maybe what I like about it is the high key effect. I do appreciate the look and opinion. It always helps me to work for improvement. -- Best regards, Bruce Friday, September 29, 2006, 7:18:39 AM, you wrote: C> Bruce Dayton wrote: >> Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. >> >> Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld >> ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 >> >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm >> >> Comments welcome >> C> I like the try at a different perspective, but the glaring sky really C> bothers me :-) As counterpoint, the sky in the formation of pelicans C> didn't bother me, but here it seems brighter and competes with the plant. C> -- C> Christian C> http://photography.skofteland.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Looking up
Sorry to make you squint. I tried a lowering the background a bit and didn't like it as well. Thanks for looking. -- Best regards, Bruce Friday, September 29, 2006, 6:35:03 AM, you wrote: GD> Yes, rather different from your usual: my eyes squint at the glare of GD> the clouds above! GD> You did a good job of rending on such a high contrast photo. GD> Godfrey GD> On Sep 28, 2006, at 10:36 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote: >> Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. >> >> Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld >> ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 >> >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Looking up
This was some taller plant - not really a tree or bush. I really have no idea what it might be called. Thanks for looking. -- Best regards, Bruce Friday, September 29, 2006, 8:05:14 AM, you wrote: RW> Beautiful! What kind of tree is this? RW> Rick RW> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Quite a difference in technique for me with this >> one. >> >> Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld >> ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 >> >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm >> >> Comments welcome >> >> -- >> Bruce >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> RW> http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW RW> __ RW> Do You Yahoo!? RW> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around RW> http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Looking up
Thanks, Paul. I bracketed the shots and played around with it PP and and felt the high key worked best. -- Bruce Friday, September 29, 2006, 3:19:50 AM, you wrote: PS> A nice composition. The effect is similar to shooting against a backlit PS> screen in the studio. I like it. PS> Paul PS> On Sep 29, 2006, at 1:36 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote: >> Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. >> >> Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld >> ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 >> >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm >> >> Comments welcome >> >> -- >> Bruce >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Looking up
Beautiful! What kind of tree is this? Rick --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quite a difference in technique for me with this > one. > > Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld > ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm > > Comments welcome > > -- > Bruce > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Looking up
Bruce Dayton wrote: > Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. > > Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld > ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm > > Comments welcome > I like the try at a different perspective, but the glaring sky really bothers me :-) As counterpoint, the sky in the formation of pelicans didn't bother me, but here it seems brighter and competes with the plant. -- Christian http://photography.skofteland.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Looking up
Yes, rather different from your usual: my eyes squint at the glare of the clouds above! You did a good job of rending on such a high contrast photo. Godfrey On Sep 28, 2006, at 10:36 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. > > Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld > ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: PESO - Looking up
A nice composition. The effect is similar to shooting against a backlit screen in the studio. I like it. Paul On Sep 29, 2006, at 1:36 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. > > Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld > ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 > > http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm > > Comments welcome > > -- > Bruce > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
