Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
Um, in general I think it's ok to use a flash that's convering a wider angle then the lens, it's the other way around that would cause a visible defect such as vignetting - Original Message - From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:16 PM Subject: RE: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom -Original Message- From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Only problem is that being 135mm, I am unable to use any of my flash guns with it in TTL mode (they all only zoom to 105mm), ???! If you're saying what I think you're saying you're wrong. tv
RE: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
That's what I was implying...she seemed to think ttl would stop working because the lens didn't match the zoom setting on the flash. tv -- Thomas Van Veen Photography www.thomasvanveen.com 301-758-3085 -Original Message- From: Dave Miers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 2:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom Um, in general I think it's ok to use a flash that's convering a wider angle then the lens, it's the other way around that would cause a visible defect such as vignetting - Original Message - From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:16 PM Subject: RE: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom -Original Message- From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Only problem is that being 135mm, I am unable to use any of my flash guns with it in TTL mode (they all only zoom to 105mm), ???! If you're saying what I think you're saying you're wrong. tv
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
Dave Miers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Um, in general I think it's ok to use a flash that's convering a wider angle then the lens, it's the other way around that would cause a visible defect such as vignetting Absolutely. I do it all the time with outdoor fill flash. I've used an 18mm lens with my AF400FTZ set to the 105mm setting (one and a half stops down from ambient) to pick out details in the main subject while leaving everything else in the frame alone. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave Miers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Um, in general I think it's ok to use a flash that's convering a wider angle then the lens, it's the other way around that would cause a visible defect such as vignetting Absolutely. I do it all the time with outdoor fill flash. I've used an 18mm lens with my AF400FTZ set to the 105mm setting (one and a half stops down from ambient) to pick out details in the main subject while leaving everything else in the frame alone. Sorry about that bizarre post. Not quite awake here yet ;) What I meant to point out is that you *can* use flash coverage that's narrower than the field of view of the lens in some special instances. It's almost always OK to use flash coverage that's wider than the FOV of the lens (as long as you're sure the flash is powerful enough - remember the flash has less effective power as you spread its coverage out). -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Mark Roberts wrote: What I meant to point out is that you *can* use flash coverage that's narrower than the field of view of the lens in some special instances. It's almost always OK to use flash coverage that's wider than the FOV of the lens (as long as you're sure the flash is powerful enough - remember the flash has less effective power as you spread its coverage out). In the case of a TTL flash on a TTL camera you will get notification if the flash thinks it has managed to achieve its goal. When not shooting rapidly, I just look for the green light at the back, particularly in the case of the anaemic (but lovely) AF080C. Kostas
Manual Flash (was Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom)
Tanya, you might like to try the 135 with your flash (but not the built-in one) in aperture priority, using the guide number method to choose the aperture. I have usually found that TTL works well in this mode, quenching the flash at just the right exposure, provided that you haven't chosen too small an aperture so that the flash will never make it. In addition, although the coverage is theoretically inadequate, you will often find that the fall-off is outside your real subject area, particularly for portraits, and you will benefit from either unlit backgrounds in large rooms or a quite acceptable falling-off if you have a close background, rather like the oval vignetting found in Victorian era portraits. Worth a try? John Coyle Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 11:40 AM Subject: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom Yeah John. This is why I love the Tamron 135mm f2.5 that I have. It is old and manual, and all metal, weighs a ton, but does some lovely things to skin, and skin tones whilst still appearing very sharp. Has great bokeh too. Only problem is that being 135mm, I am unable to use any of my flash guns with it in TTL mode (they all only zoom to 105mm), and manual flash photography is just one of the areas I know absolutely, (well, virtually) nothing about. I really do need to learn about this. I do know how to use the guide no. divided by distance to find f-stop equation, but this rarely suits me as I like to be able to choose my f-stop for depth of field control over exposure. I would be happy to use the Tamron exclusively if I could somehow find a way to use flash with it when needed, and still be able to choose my f-stops at will... tan. - Original Message - From: John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 10:57 AM Subject: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom Tanya, can't say that I have done too much genuine very-close-up shots with this lens: about the closest was bloom on an African Tulip, where the area framed was about 200x170mm. I might try a couple of subjects like postage stamps, etc. just to see how it goes. With your portraits, sounds like a soft-focus lens might be a worthwhile purchase! John Coyle Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:32 AM Subject: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom John, how have you found it for closeup work using the psuedo macro function? Was it still sharp when focusing this closely? I tend to do my macro type shots different from the norm and like limited depth of field, so how would it go if it were wide open at this focal length/focussing distance? I have discovered today upon receiving some film back that it is indeed much too sharp for alot of my portraiture work. I have some shots back of an older lady and EVERY nook and crevice in her face is shown up! lol. Makes for interesting textures though! Hmmm, sand and lenses, not generally a preferred combination John... tan. - Original Message - From: John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom Tanya, I have this lens, with the manual too, if you need any info. I have had it for about three years, and it's my standard walk-about lens. Very sharp, light, and fast enough to lock focus very quickly on both my MZ-5 and MZ-S. It's been totally problem free in all that time, although the focus scale has drifted off (I think I got some sand in it from Peregian Beach!), but still works fine. Any specific questions? John Coyle Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:04 AM Subject: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom Question - I just bought this lens, the Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom f4-f5.6 (from ebay, for like au$150!!!). It is in PERFECT condition and I am very happy with my purchase. Course I don't use the powerzoom crap, but the lens itself is great. I also got a very pleasant surprise, when I discovered that at the 105mm end, it is extremely close focusing. Almost to the point of being macro? Boz's site and the lens itself, say that it goes to .43mm focussing distance, but I am getting into even closer ranges with the lens spinning around to show a little flower symbol (if this makes any sense), that I have always taken to indicate a macro function? I know this might all sound very rudimentary to you guys and gals
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
Yeah John. This is why I love the Tamron 135mm f2.5 that I have. It is old and manual, and all metal, weighs a ton, but does some lovely things to skin, and skin tones whilst still appearing very sharp. Has great bokeh too. Only problem is that being 135mm, I am unable to use any of my flash guns with it in TTL mode (they all only zoom to 105mm), and manual flash photography is just one of the areas I know absolutely, (well, virtually) nothing about. I really do need to learn about this. I do know how to use the guide no. divided by distance to find f-stop equation, but this rarely suits me as I like to be able to choose my f-stop for depth of field control over exposure. I would be happy to use the Tamron exclusively if I could somehow find a way to use flash with it when needed, and still be able to choose my f-stops at will... tan. - Original Message - From: John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 10:57 AM Subject: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom Tanya, can't say that I have done too much genuine very-close-up shots with this lens: about the closest was bloom on an African Tulip, where the area framed was about 200x170mm. I might try a couple of subjects like postage stamps, etc. just to see how it goes. With your portraits, sounds like a soft-focus lens might be a worthwhile purchase! John Coyle Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:32 AM Subject: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom John, how have you found it for closeup work using the psuedo macro function? Was it still sharp when focusing this closely? I tend to do my macro type shots different from the norm and like limited depth of field, so how would it go if it were wide open at this focal length/focussing distance? I have discovered today upon receiving some film back that it is indeed much too sharp for alot of my portraiture work. I have some shots back of an older lady and EVERY nook and crevice in her face is shown up! lol. Makes for interesting textures though! Hmmm, sand and lenses, not generally a preferred combination John... tan. - Original Message - From: John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:45 AM Subject: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom Tanya, I have this lens, with the manual too, if you need any info. I have had it for about three years, and it's my standard walk-about lens. Very sharp, light, and fast enough to lock focus very quickly on both my MZ-5 and MZ-S. It's been totally problem free in all that time, although the focus scale has drifted off (I think I got some sand in it from Peregian Beach!), but still works fine. Any specific questions? John Coyle Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:04 AM Subject: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom Question - I just bought this lens, the Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom f4-f5.6 (from ebay, for like au$150!!!). It is in PERFECT condition and I am very happy with my purchase. Course I don't use the powerzoom crap, but the lens itself is great. I also got a very pleasant surprise, when I discovered that at the 105mm end, it is extremely close focusing. Almost to the point of being macro? Boz's site and the lens itself, say that it goes to .43mm focussing distance, but I am getting into even closer ranges with the lens spinning around to show a little flower symbol (if this makes any sense), that I have always taken to indicate a macro function? I know this might all sound very rudimentary to you guys and gals, but until now I have only ever had a collection of manual focus Pentax lenses and all of my AF stuff has been third party. As this lens was purchased second-hand, I don't have a manual to go by. Does anyone else have this lens and could they shed some light on this for me? I have found so far that it is extremely sharp and I really love it. Does anyone know of any problems etc that I should be aware of when shooting with it? Many thanks, tan.
RE: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
-Original Message- From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Only problem is that being 135mm, I am unable to use any of my flash guns with it in TTL mode (they all only zoom to 105mm), ???! If you're saying what I think you're saying you're wrong. tv
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
There is no problem, infact it is probably better, to have the the coverage of the flash broader than the FOV of the lens. I use a large flash that covers the field for a 28mm lens, and use it will all focal length lenses. The advantage to having wider coverage is that the light from the flash will be more even. Very often there is a hot spot in the center of the light pattern with shoe mount flashes. In doors you get the advantage of the light, on the edges, reflecting off the walls and ceilings, softening the light. BR From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] Only problem is that being 135mm, I am unable to use any of my flash guns with it in TTL mode (they all only zoom to 105mm), and manual flash photography is just one of the areas I know absolutely, (well, virtually) nothing about.
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
I can almost guarantee it tom, so correct me!! I NEED to learn... tan. - Original Message - From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 12:16 PM Subject: RE: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom -Original Message- From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Only problem is that being 135mm, I am unable to use any of my flash guns with it in TTL mode (they all only zoom to 105mm), ???! If you're saying what I think you're saying you're wrong. tv
RE: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
I think Bruce already answered this. Anyway...the flash coverage doesn't really have anything to do with the ttl. If the flash is set at 105 it just means it's throwing out a beam of light that matches the angle that a 105mm lens sees. The 135 sees a narrower angle, but that's ok. As far as flash zooming goes, you just want to be careful not to have your flash set for coverage that is narrower than the lens you're using. If you had the flash set at 105 and you were using a 28mm lens the edges of the frame would be dark. Ok? None of this has anything to do with the ttl meter. Your 135 will work in ttl mode. tv
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
Tan You should be able to use your TTL flash at the 105 setting with the 135. The important thing to remember is to be within the distance range of the flash. Butch Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself. Hermann Hesse (Demian)
RE: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
I have not found any problems. I like it so much I have had it repaired twice and it functions just like new. (the problems were my fault, like dropping it on its nose and I snagged the switch at the front of the lens and pulled it off). Now that I have a PZ1p I am liking it even more. I have dedicated myself to some very fine Pentax primes but I still can't resist using it a lot of the time. -Original Message- From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 6:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom Question - I just bought this lens, the Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom f4-f5.6 (from ebay, for like au$150!!!). It is in PERFECT condition and I am very happy with my purchase. Course I don't use the powerzoom crap, but the lens itself is great. I also got a very pleasant surprise, when I discovered that at the 105mm end, it is extremely close focusing. Almost to the point of being macro? Boz's site and the lens itself, say that it goes to .43mm focussing distance, but I am getting into even closer ranges with the lens spinning around to show a little flower symbol (if this makes any sense), that I have always taken to indicate a macro function? I know this might all sound very rudimentary to you guys and gals, but until now I have only ever had a collection of manual focus Pentax lenses and all of my AF stuff has been third party. As this lens was purchased second-hand, I don't have a manual to go by. Does anyone else have this lens and could they shed some light on this for me? I have found so far that it is extremely sharp and I really love it. Does anyone know of any problems etc that I should be aware of when shooting with it? Many thanks, tan.
Re: My website down (?) - Was: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think my ISP has rung in a change of service terms on me, and is starting to charge for bandwidth. This month, for the first time ever, I have been getting warnings every day or two that I was going to run out of bandwidth before I run out of month. Unless of course I buy more bandwidth. When I tried to log on to check the usage logs, they wouldn't let me log on until I clicked Accept on the revised terms-and-conditions. So I decided to not log on and to wait and see what happens. Tanya, I suspect that your experience is not unique to you, that the site is down until the next usage month or until I pay more or until I move it to another ISP. I hate to change addresses, I have my wife's site hosted by the same company, but I don't like being held hostage either and will probably make a change. Stay tuned. The company that hosts my domain for me is quite affordable and has no bandwidth surcharges. Email me privately if you are interested. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: distance, but I am getting into even closer ranges with the lens spinning around to show a little flower symbol (if this makes any sense), that I have always taken to indicate a macro function? On the American Pentax site and under Literature-Download Manuals you can find a generic leaflet on FA lenses. I copy from page 20. Note on Tulip mark The zoom lens provide with the tulip mark on the focusing ring that enable to take a picture at closest distance as a fixed focal length lens, even set at wide-angle position. However, at the edges of picture may be darkened due to reducing brightness of image field. This and weight are the advantages of the FA28-80/3.5-5.6 over the F28-80/3.5-4.5; the latter is macro, but at 80. HTH, Kostas (wondering if the non-PZ version is lighter without loss of performance, on the premise that, as you said, PZ is a gimmick for a few but not for me)
Re: My website down (?) - Was: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
Hi Stan, On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 20:34:27 -0600, Stan Halpin wrote: I hate to change addresses, I have my wife's site hosted by the same company, but I don't like being held hostage either and will probably make a change. Stay tuned. I don't know who is your ISP, but I've been using pair.com for a year or so and have been quite happy. The rates and TsCs both seem pretty liberal to me, but I have a low traffic site. TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
Tanya, I have this lens, with the manual too, if you need any info. I have had it for about three years, and it's my standard walk-about lens. Very sharp, light, and fast enough to lock focus very quickly on both my MZ-5 and MZ-S. It's been totally problem free in all that time, although the focus scale has drifted off (I think I got some sand in it from Peregian Beach!), but still works fine. Any specific questions? John Coyle Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:04 AM Subject: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom Question - I just bought this lens, the Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom f4-f5.6 (from ebay, for like au$150!!!). It is in PERFECT condition and I am very happy with my purchase. Course I don't use the powerzoom crap, but the lens itself is great. I also got a very pleasant surprise, when I discovered that at the 105mm end, it is extremely close focusing. Almost to the point of being macro? Boz's site and the lens itself, say that it goes to .43mm focussing distance, but I am getting into even closer ranges with the lens spinning around to show a little flower symbol (if this makes any sense), that I have always taken to indicate a macro function? I know this might all sound very rudimentary to you guys and gals, but until now I have only ever had a collection of manual focus Pentax lenses and all of my AF stuff has been third party. As this lens was purchased second-hand, I don't have a manual to go by. Does anyone else have this lens and could they shed some light on this for me? I have found so far that it is extremely sharp and I really love it. Does anyone know of any problems etc that I should be aware of when shooting with it? Many thanks, tan.
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
Question - I just bought this lens, the Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom f4-f5.6 (from ebay, for like au$150!!!). It is in PERFECT condition and I am very happy with my purchase. Course I don't use the powerzoom crap, but the lens itself is great. Many thanks, tan. Good to know.I'm thinking of adding it to my line up with the PZ-1 i purchased in Nov.The reviews for those who have it are mostly favorable. Thanks Dave
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
Stan! I DID check your website, and that is WHY I purchased it! grins. OT - your website seems to be down right at the moment, or is it just at my end? Thanks heaps for your comments, I mainly purchased this lens to get me through until I got my Tamron 28-200mm back, BUT I now think it will be my primary portrait lens, as I can use it with the 360fgz without having to worry about going over the zoom distance, AND it works perfectly with the Mz-6/ZX-L too. S, the softness at the 28mm end isn't really an issue for me, as I will generally always be shooting at 85-105mm. BUT, it is a shame that at f5.6 it is a little slow. When I bid on this lens, there was also an FA 100mm f2.8 macro being auctioned. I have wanted THAT particular lens for SO long and I was SO excited to see it, BUT it ended up going for like $650 and I can buy one new for $850 so I let it go and went with this one instead. Still dreaming of the 100mm though! Until I can afford it the Tamron 135mm f2.5 will suffice (although it doesn't have macro capabilities). What does psuedo macro mean? And how exactly does it work? tan. - Original Message - From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:24 AM Subject: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom on 12/02/03 6:04 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Question - I just bought this lens, the Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom f4-f5.6 (from ebay, for like au$150!!!). It is in PERFECT condition and I am very happy with my purchase. Course I don't use the powerzoom crap, but the lens itself is great. I also got a very pleasant surprise, when I discovered that at the 105mm end, it is extremely close focusing. Almost to the point of being macro? Boz's site and the lens itself, say that it goes to .43mm focussing distance, but I am getting into even closer ranges with the lens spinning around to show a little flower symbol (if this makes any sense), that I have always taken to indicate a macro function? I know this might all sound very rudimentary to you guys and gals, but until now I have only ever had a collection of manual focus Pentax lenses and all of my AF stuff has been third party. As this lens was purchased second-hand, I don't have a manual to go by. Does anyone else have this lens and could they shed some light on this for me? I have found so far that it is extremely sharp and I really love it. Does anyone know of any problems etc that I should be aware of when shooting with it? Many thanks, tan. There are no problems with this lens except the obvious: 1. You cannot effectively shade a wide-range zoom, and so you can expect flare problems if you are not careful; 2. It seems to get to the /5.6 end of things very quickly as you zoom in. And /5.6 is very slow... 3. You'll get some shadow-cast from the lens itself if you use on-camera flash at the wide end. Yes, it does have a psuedo macro function, and yes it is a very fine lens. My sense, without any systematic tests, is that it is a bit soft at 28mm, otherwise quite sharp. As you would know if you checked my aging-but-still-relevant website, g, this was once judged to be about the best of this class of lenses. I am finding mine to be a nice walking-around lens on the ist-D, with the 20-35 handy in case I need the wider view... Stan
RE: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
I got lucky earlier this year on a used FA 100mm f2.8 macro. It has three small 'scars' around the end of the lens from a clamp-on macro flash, but otherwise in perfect condition. Only paid $250 US and I couldn't be happier with it. If you find one for the right price I recommend it, great for portraits and macro work. David Madsen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.davidmadsen.com -Original Message- From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 6:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom When I bid on this lens, there was also an FA 100mm f2.8 macro being auctioned. I have wanted THAT particular lens for SO long and I was SO excited to see it, BUT it ended up going for like $650 and I can buy one new for $850 so I let it go and went with this one instead. Still dreaming of the 100mm though! Until I can afford it the Tamron 135mm f2.5 will suffice (although it doesn't have macro capabilities).
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
By psuedo-macro I meant that this is one of many lenses that claim to be macro but really aren't (IMHO) since they are not designed for a flat field of focus, they are not optimized for the close rather than distant subjects, and they don't focus all that close anyway. An ok alternative to using a close-up filter on some other lens, but not a total substitute for a real macro lens. BTW, I had the FA 100/2.8, sold it when I was able to get the A version. I think that the M-100/2.8 or /4 is a far better portrait lens; the 100mm macros are too sharp and the highlights can tend to be somewhat harsh. For a really good macro, get the FA100/2.8. For a rally good portrait lens, get the FA85/1.4. the FA77 Limited, or one of the older 100mm A or M lenses. If you are going to try to get one lens that does double duty for macro and portrait, the FA 28-105/4-5.6 is probably about as good as you can do. IMHO g Stan on 12/02/03 7:16 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stan! I DID check your website, and that is WHY I purchased it! grins. OT - your website seems to be down right at the moment, or is it just at my end? Thanks heaps for your comments, I mainly purchased this lens to get me through until I got my Tamron 28-200mm back,... What does psuedo macro mean? And how exactly does it work? tan.
My website down (?) - Was: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
on 12/02/03 7:16 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... OT - your website seems to be down right at the moment, or is it just at my end? ... tan. I think my ISP has rung in a change of service terms on me, and is starting to charge for bandwidth. This month, for the first time ever, I have been getting warnings every day or two that I was going to run out of bandwidth before I run out of month. Unless of course I buy more bandwidth. When I tried to log on to check the usage logs, they wouldn't let me log on until I clicked Accept on the revised terms-and-conditions. So I decided to not log on and to wait and see what happens. Tanya, I suspect that your experience is not unique to you, that the site is down until the next usage month or until I pay more or until I move it to another ISP. I hate to change addresses, I have my wife's site hosted by the same company, but I don't like being held hostage either and will probably make a change. Stay tuned. Stan
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
The only problem I have had is vignetting at 28mm especially with a polarizer or generic lens hood. Like you, I agree it is a superb optic. With regard, Robert Woerner
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
Thanks Stan! So I bought quite wisely then! lol. I am still interested in this whole macro thingy. I only discovered it on the 28-105 by pure accident, and nothing I can find anywhere even refers to it having ANY sort of macro capabilities. Do you know any links/references where this is discussed? tan. - Original Message - From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:25 PM Subject: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom By psuedo-macro I meant that this is one of many lenses that claim to be macro but really aren't (IMHO) since they are not designed for a flat field of focus, they are not optimized for the close rather than distant subjects, and they don't focus all that close anyway. An ok alternative to using a close-up filter on some other lens, but not a total substitute for a real macro lens. BTW, I had the FA 100/2.8, sold it when I was able to get the A version. I think that the M-100/2.8 or /4 is a far better portrait lens; the 100mm macros are too sharp and the highlights can tend to be somewhat harsh. For a really good macro, get the FA100/2.8. For a rally good portrait lens, get the FA85/1.4. the FA77 Limited, or one of the older 100mm A or M lenses. If you are going to try to get one lens that does double duty for macro and portrait, the FA 28-105/4-5.6 is probably about as good as you can do. IMHO g Stan on 12/02/03 7:16 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stan! I DID check your website, and that is WHY I purchased it! grins. OT - your website seems to be down right at the moment, or is it just at my end? Thanks heaps for your comments, I mainly purchased this lens to get me through until I got my Tamron 28-200mm back,... What does psuedo macro mean? And how exactly does it work? tan.
Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
Many thanks mike! - Original Message - From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom Hi, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: I know this might all sound very rudimentary to you guys and gals, but until now I have only ever had a collection of manual focus Pentax lenses and all of my AF stuff has been third party. As this lens was purchased second-hand, I don't have a manual to go by. Does anyone else have this lens and could they shed some light on this for me? I have found so far that it is extremely sharp and I really love it. Does anyone know of any problems etc that I should be aware of when shooting with it? It's not on http://www.pentax.com/docstore/index.cfm?show=6 as yet but it may be worth checking regularly. mike
RE: Pentax 28-105mm FA powerzoom
Stan wrote...For a really good macro, get the FA100/2.8. For a rally good portrait lens, get the FA85/1.4... I agree, that's why I have them. David Madsen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.davidmadsen.com
