Re: Re: Dilemma

2021-08-03 Thread collinb
Thanks for the info. I was aware of the limited production but not of the 
allocations. I’ve see a variety of speculations about the specifics of the 
anniversary (75th, 1Mth, 2Mth) but that’s sort of immaterial as it remains an 
anniversary model.

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:

> Ah, a Rollei 35S Silber. That's a real collectible, and a fine little camera.
>
> The Rollei 35S Silber was produced in a very limited run during 1979 to 
> celebrate the one millionth Rollei 35S produced. It was never offered with a 
> retail price or advertised, being offered to dealers at about $155 cost with 
> dealers  supposed to be offering it to their best Rollei customers at 
> whatever markup they felt was appropriate. The original set included a 
> certificate that, when mailed in, would deliver to the customer an engraved 
> badge that fit in the little section on the back in the leather that you 
> popped off the camera as a commemorative notion. The Silber also included a 
> special case and certificate in the original box. 1500 of them were 
> distributed in the United States, and the distributor's note to dealers 
> included the notation "Limited quantity, offer never to be repeated."
>
> I had one of these for a while, one of five or six Rollei 35 cameras I 
> enjoyed. In all ways other than the commemorative notion and the special 
> finish and color, it is a standard Rollei 35S and works beautifully. I sold 
> it somewhere around 2008 or so when I divested myself of my over-abundance of 
> things Rollei 35; I kept my favorite black Rollei 35S only, and still have 
> and use it occasionally.
>
> The Canonet is another fine little camera but I have no personal connection 
> to that or any of the other raft of decent, small, fixed-lens RF cameras of 
> that era. There were a lot of them, most of them pretty good performers.
>
> G
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Re: Dilemma

2021-07-30 Thread collinb
Agreed.

Mark C wrote:

> Sweet... I once had one of those Cannonet rangefinders and loved it.
>
> Mark
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: Re: Dilemma

2021-07-30 Thread collinb
The Canon was my first 35mm back in 1980. About a year later I got my first 
K1000 but would regularly shoot another GIII that I’d pick up here and there.

Yes, I was quite happy with the lens and results.

Matthew Hunt wrote:

> I don't have the broad experience with different cameras that many folks on 
> this list do, but my Canonet QL1\[7\] GIII is my sentimental favorite, and 
> the only film camera that I still occasionally use in the digital era. The 
> lens is probably better than you're anticipating.
>
> https://flickr.com/search/?user_id=13693939%40N07&sort=date-taken-desc&text=canonet&view_all=1
>
> (The most recent ones, at the top, are part of a double-exposure
> project with a friend, where we each shot the same roll.)
>
> One of my Canonet shots was published in a book, quite large:
>
> https://flickr.com/photos/coneslayer/6953258544/in/photolist-ehEFdK-4J3Dz8-ekkcgp-sfXWfC-bArgw1-ehEFk4-ehLqp1-ehLqhA
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.