Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-25 Thread Jos from Holland

Thanks Godfrey,
I would think, if I can fill the frame with a reasonable sharp insect, 
it would be sharper with SR on.
Pictures of insects in action cannot aleays be done with a tripod.Other 
means for stabilization are used by me, like elbows on the ground. At 
first sight I would think that a minor shake with small angle of view of 
macro will give the same blur on the sensor as a larger shake with a 
400mm tele. Maybe the problem is that the Pentax system can not handle 
minor shake, due to shake sensor sensitivity or noise.

Greetz Jos

On 24-10-2012 20:18, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:

I don't know of any image stabilization system that has sufficient
range to work properly for macrophotography. In practical terms, it
can work ok for low magnifications (1:4 and lower) but in the 1:1 to
1:3 range it simply can't do enough to make a difference.




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-25 Thread Jos from Holland

Bruce,
 I have those left-right and front-rear slides on my tripod,I use that 
for not moving objects. But even with the sliders, I mostly have to take 
the camera off to follow insects that are running around :-)

Greetz, Jos


On 24-10-2012 23:52, Bruce Walker wrote:

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:

Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:


If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for
macro.

I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not saying it isn't
there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention span  :-)

That's a Mark! right there.



The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.

I think that covers most macro usage. Detailed macro work is almost
always going to be on a tripod.




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-25 Thread Jos from Holland

Thx Toine,
Maybe I overlooked that. I have it allways on...
Jos

On 24-10-2012 20:25, Toine wrote:

If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for macro.

Toine

On 24 October 2012 18:32, Jos from Holland jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu wrote:

I always wondered how to adjust for image stabilization in macro. I use
SMC-M 100mm macro and SMC-M 50mm on my K5d quite often with a macro ring. I
have to adjust the focal distance of the lens manually. But what really
counts for image stabilization is the angle of view, I guess. So should I
use a correction factor and adjust maybe 300mm for the 100mm lens??? Similar
things for my Sigma 17-70mm in macro mode.  Any thoughts?? Greetings, Jos

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-25 Thread Toine
K20D manual page 67
K5 manual page 142

The effect of shake reduction is influenced by the shooting distance
as well as focal length information. The share reduction function may
not work as effectively as expected when shooting at close ranges



On 24 October 2012 23:33, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
 Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:

 If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for
 macro.



 I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not saying it isn't
 there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention span  :-)

 The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.



 Cheers

 Brian

 +
 Brian Walters
 Australian Native Plants Society (Australia)
 http://anpsa.org.au




 Toine

 On 24 October 2012 18:32, Jos from Holland jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu
 wrote:

 I always wondered how to adjust for image stabilization in macro. I use
 SMC-M 100mm macro and SMC-M 50mm on my K5d quite often with a macro ring.
 I
 have to adjust the focal distance of the lens manually. But what really
 counts for image stabilization is the angle of view, I guess. So should I
 use a correction factor and adjust maybe 300mm for the 100mm lens???
 Similar
 things for my Sigma 17-70mm in macro mode.  Any thoughts?? Greetings, Jos

 --



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


RE: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-25 Thread J.C. O'Connell
I would think the reason SR doesnt work well for macro is that the
effective focal length of the lens gets significantly longer when
in macro mode causing a mismatch of SR parameters and lens in use.

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Toine
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 5:18 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

K20D manual page 67
K5 manual page 142

The effect of shake reduction is influenced by the shooting distance
as well as focal length information. The share reduction function may
not work as effectively as expected when shooting at close ranges



On 24 October 2012 23:33, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
 Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:

 If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for
 macro.



 I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not saying it
isn't
 there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention span  :-)

 The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.



 Cheers

 Brian

 +
 Brian Walters
 Australian Native Plants Society (Australia)
 http://anpsa.org.au




 Toine

 On 24 October 2012 18:32, Jos from Holland jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu
 wrote:

 I always wondered how to adjust for image stabilization in macro. I use
 SMC-M 100mm macro and SMC-M 50mm on my K5d quite often with a macro
ring.
 I
 have to adjust the focal distance of the lens manually. But what really
 counts for image stabilization is the angle of view, I guess. So should
I
 use a correction factor and adjust maybe 300mm for the 100mm lens???
 Similar
 things for my Sigma 17-70mm in macro mode.  Any thoughts?? Greetings,
Jos

 --



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-25 Thread Bruce Walker
You should just gas those fast ones, Jos. :-)


On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Jos from Holland
jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu wrote:
 Bruce,
  I have those left-right and front-rear slides on my tripod,I use that for
 not moving objects. But even with the sliders, I mostly have to take the
 camera off to follow insects that are running around :-)
 Greetz, Jos



 On 24-10-2012 23:52, Bruce Walker wrote:

 On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org
 wrote:

 Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:

 If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for
 macro.

 I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not saying it
 isn't
 there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention span  :-)

 That's a Mark! right there.


 The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.

 I think that covers most macro usage. Detailed macro work is almost
 always going to be on a tripod.



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.



-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-25 Thread Kenneth Waller



-Original Message-
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com

Subject: Re: What about immage stabilization and macro


Or use flash.

You should just gas those fast ones, Jos. :-)


On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Jos from Holland
jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu wrote:
 Bruce,
  I have those left-right and front-rear slides on my tripod,I use that for
 not moving objects. But even with the sliders, I mostly have to take the
 camera off to follow insects that are running around :-)
 Greetz, Jos



 On 24-10-2012 23:52, Bruce Walker wrote:

 On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org
 wrote:

 Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:

 If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for
 macro.

 I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not saying it
 isn't
 there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention span  :-)

 That's a Mark! right there.


 The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.

 I think that covers most macro usage. Detailed macro work is almost
 always going to be on a tripod.



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-25 Thread Jos from Holland
HiHi, well I know those tricks of cooling them in the fridge or make 
them walk on sellotape, but that seldom leads to pictures I want to hang 
above my bed

Jos
On 25-10-2012 14:56, Bruce Walker wrote:

You should just gas those fast ones, Jos. :-)


On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Jos from Holland
jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu wrote:

Bruce,
  I have those left-right and front-rear slides on my tripod,I use that for
not moving objects. But even with the sliders, I mostly have to take the
camera off to follow insects that are running around :-)
Greetz, Jos



On 24-10-2012 23:52, Bruce Walker wrote:

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org
wrote:

Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:


If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for
macro.

I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not saying it
isn't
there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention span  :-)

That's a Mark! right there.



The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.

I think that covers most macro usage. Detailed macro work is almost
always going to be on a tripod.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.






--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-25 Thread Jos from Holland
exactly, maybe at the end it all boils down to viewing angle. Maybe 
focal length should be replaced by viewing angle at focus, gets us rid 
of correction factors for APS-C versus FF as well.

Jos
On 25-10-2012 11:35, J.C. O'Connell wrote:

I would think the reason SR doesnt work well for macro is that the
effective focal length of the lens gets significantly longer when
in macro mode causing a mismatch of SR parameters and lens in use.

-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-

-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Toine
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 5:18 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

K20D manual page 67
K5 manual page 142

The effect of shake reduction is influenced by the shooting distance
as well as focal length information. The share reduction function may
not work as effectively as expected when shooting at close ranges



On 24 October 2012 23:33, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:

Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:


If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for
macro.



I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not saying it

isn't

there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention span  :-)

The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.



Cheers

Brian

+
Brian Walters
Australian Native Plants Society (Australia)
http://anpsa.org.au




Toine

On 24 October 2012 18:32, Jos from Holland jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu
wrote:

I always wondered how to adjust for image stabilization in macro. I use
SMC-M 100mm macro and SMC-M 50mm on my K5d quite often with a macro

ring.

I
have to adjust the focal distance of the lens manually. But what really
counts for image stabilization is the angle of view, I guess. So should

I

use a correction factor and adjust maybe 300mm for the 100mm lens???
Similar
things for my Sigma 17-70mm in macro mode.  Any thoughts?? Greetings,

Jos

--



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-25 Thread Matthew Hunt
The other big issue is that most SR systems only correct for angular
movement (pointing the camera in various directions). At macro
distances, translational movement (shifting the camera) is also
significant. Canon has some recent IS macro lenses that are supposed
to compensate for both types of movement.

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Jos from Holland
jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu wrote:
 exactly, maybe at the end it all boils down to viewing angle. Maybe focal
 length should be replaced by viewing angle at focus, gets us rid of
 correction factors for APS-C versus FF as well.
 Jos

 On 25-10-2012 11:35, J.C. O'Connell wrote:

 I would think the reason SR doesnt work well for macro is that the
 effective focal length of the lens gets significantly longer when
 in macro mode causing a mismatch of SR parameters and lens in use.

 -
 J.C.O'Connell
 hifis...@gate.net
 -

 -Original Message-
 From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Toine
 Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 5:18 AM
 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 Subject: Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

 K20D manual page 67
 K5 manual page 142

 The effect of shake reduction is influenced by the shooting distance
 as well as focal length information. The share reduction function may
 not work as effectively as expected when shooting at close ranges



 On 24 October 2012 23:33, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:

 Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:

 If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for
 macro.



 I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not saying it

 isn't

 there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention span  :-)

 The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.



 Cheers

 Brian

 +
 Brian Walters
 Australian Native Plants Society (Australia)
 http://anpsa.org.au



 Toine

 On 24 October 2012 18:32, Jos from Holland jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu
 wrote:

 I always wondered how to adjust for image stabilization in macro. I use
 SMC-M 100mm macro and SMC-M 50mm on my K5d quite often with a macro

 ring.

 I
 have to adjust the focal distance of the lens manually. But what really
 counts for image stabilization is the angle of view, I guess. So should

 I

 use a correction factor and adjust maybe 300mm for the 100mm lens???
 Similar
 things for my Sigma 17-70mm in macro mode.  Any thoughts?? Greetings,

 Jos

 --



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-25 Thread P. J. Alling

You must have /interesting/ dreams.

On 10/25/2012 11:18 AM, Jos from Holland wrote:
HiHi, well I know those tricks of cooling them in the fridge or make 
them walk on sellotape, but that seldom leads to pictures I want to 
hang above my bed

Jos
On 25-10-2012 14:56, Bruce Walker wrote:

You should just gas those fast ones, Jos. :-)


On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Jos from Holland
jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu wrote:

Bruce,
  I have those left-right and front-rear slides on my tripod,I use 
that for
not moving objects. But even with the sliders, I mostly have to take 
the

camera off to follow insects that are running around :-)
Greetz, Jos



On 24-10-2012 23:52, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Brian Walters 
apathy...@lyons-ryan.org

wrote:

Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:

If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched 
off for

macro.
I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not 
saying it

isn't
there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention 
span  :-)

That's a Mark! right there.


The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod 
mounted.

I think that covers most macro usage. Detailed macro work is almost
always going to be on a tripod.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.









--
Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a 
lengthly search.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-25 Thread Brian Walters

Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:


K20D manual page 67
K5 manual page 142

The effect of shake reduction is influenced by the shooting distance
as well as focal length information. The share reduction function may
not work as effectively as expected when shooting at close ranges




...and, as I've now discovered, on Page 67 of the K200D manual.

I gotta be more attentive when I consult the manuals although it  
occurred to me that the manuals could use a 'Cheat Sheet' or summary  
section that lists the limitations of the various shooting modes.  Dot  
points would be good.


The 200D came with a 'Quick Guide but it only mentions turning SR off  
when using a tripod - nothing about close shooting.





Cheers

Brian

+
Brian Walters
Australian Native Plants Society (Australia)
http://anpsa.org.au





On 24 October 2012 23:33, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:

Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:


If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for
macro.




I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not saying it isn't
there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention span  :-)

The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.



Cheers

Brian

+
Brian Walters
Australian Native Plants Society (Australia)
http://anpsa.org.au





Toine

On 24 October 2012 18:32, Jos from Holland jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu
wrote:


I always wondered how to adjust for image stabilization in macro. I use
SMC-M 100mm macro and SMC-M 50mm on my K5d quite often with a macro ring.
I
have to adjust the focal distance of the lens manually. But what really
counts for image stabilization is the angle of view, I guess. So should I
use a correction factor and adjust maybe 300mm for the 100mm lens???
Similar
things for my Sigma 17-70mm in macro mode.  Any thoughts?? Greetings, Jos

--






--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-24 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
I don't know of any image stabilization system that has sufficient
range to work properly for macrophotography. In practical terms, it
can work ok for low magnifications (1:4 and lower) but in the 1:1 to
1:3 range it simply can't do enough to make a difference.

-- 
Godfrey
  godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-24 Thread Toine
If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for macro.

Toine

On 24 October 2012 18:32, Jos from Holland jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu wrote:
 I always wondered how to adjust for image stabilization in macro. I use
 SMC-M 100mm macro and SMC-M 50mm on my K5d quite often with a macro ring. I
 have to adjust the focal distance of the lens manually. But what really
 counts for image stabilization is the angle of view, I guess. So should I
 use a correction factor and adjust maybe 300mm for the 100mm lens??? Similar
 things for my Sigma 17-70mm in macro mode.  Any thoughts?? Greetings, Jos

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-24 Thread Brian Walters

Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:

If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off  
for macro.



I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not saying it  
isn't there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention  
span  :-)


The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.



Cheers

Brian

+
Brian Walters
Australian Native Plants Society (Australia)
http://anpsa.org.au




Toine

On 24 October 2012 18:32, Jos from Holland  
jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu wrote:

I always wondered how to adjust for image stabilization in macro. I use
SMC-M 100mm macro and SMC-M 50mm on my K5d quite often with a macro ring. I
have to adjust the focal distance of the lens manually. But what really
counts for image stabilization is the angle of view, I guess. So should I
use a correction factor and adjust maybe 300mm for the 100mm lens??? Similar
things for my Sigma 17-70mm in macro mode.  Any thoughts?? Greetings, Jos

--



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-24 Thread Bruce Walker
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
 Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:

 If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for
 macro.

 I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not saying it isn't
 there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention span  :-)

That's a Mark! right there.


 The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.

I think that covers most macro usage. Detailed macro work is almost
always going to be on a tripod.

-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-24 Thread Joseph McAllister
On Oct 24, 2012, at 14:52 , Bruce Walker wrote:

 On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org 
 wrote:
 Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:
 
 If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for
 macro.
 
 I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not saying it isn't
 there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention span  :-)
 
 That's a Mark! right there.
 
 
 The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.
 
 I think that covers most macro usage. Detailed macro work is almost
 always going to be on a tripod.

I ran some tests a year ago that showed me, personally, that my tripod images 
were either equal or better with SR on than with SR off. Same with a 2 second 
delay and SR. But with a 12 sec delay, off was better.

I was headed out to the dog park yesterday afternoon (a grey and rainy day) and 
noticed a couple of our favorite birds sittin' on the swim to platform in 
Palmer Lake. Positioned the car to afford me a shot or two, using the half way 
up window to steady the camera and 18-250 with. Looking through the viewfinder 
at 250mm, I was shocked to see how unsteady my hands have become. Tried spot  
center AF, MF, and not using the window as a brace, plus 250mm vs 100mm. Think 
it was between 1/60 and 1/160 of a second with SR on. Nothing was sharp enough 
for my tastes. Guess I'll have to start lugging to 60-250 brick around. A few 
months ago I got some nice sharp images at the dog park with the lowly 80-300 
FA-J that looked better. than this 18-250. With less CA too.

Best at 250mm, and best (cropped) at 100mm plus a crop of a 250mm shot. Mind 
you, these were shot at jpeg, 5 stars, 16 mp.

http://tinyurl.com/8dt4ag5


Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com











-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-24 Thread Brian Walters

Quoting Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com:

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Brian Walters  
apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:

Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:


If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for
macro.


I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not  
saying it isn't

there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention span  :-)


That's a Mark! right there.



The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.


I think that covers most macro usage. Detailed macro work is almost
always going to be on a tripod.


I ran some tests a year ago that showed me, personally, that my  
tripod images were either equal or better with SR on than with SR  
off. Same with a 2 second delay and SR. But with a 12 sec delay, off  
was better.



Ah, now.  Are you absolutely sure about that 2 sec delay mode?

One thing I did find in the manuals (in the short periods of mental  
alertness) is that SR is turned off automatically whenever a self  
timer mode is selected




Cheers

Brian

+
Brian Walters
Australian Native Plants Society (Australia)
http://anpsa.org.au





I was headed out to the dog park yesterday afternoon (a grey and  
rainy day) and noticed a couple of our favorite birds sittin' on the  
swim to platform in Palmer Lake. Positioned the car to afford me a  
shot or two, using the half way up window to steady the camera and  
18-250 with. Looking through the viewfinder at 250mm, I was shocked  
to see how unsteady my hands have become. Tried spot  center AF,  
MF, and not using the window as a brace, plus 250mm vs 100mm. Think  
it was between 1/60 and 1/160 of a second with SR on. Nothing was  
sharp enough for my tastes. Guess I'll have to start lugging to  
60-250 brick around. A few months ago I got some nice sharp images  
at the dog park with the lowly 80-300 FA-J that looked better. than  
this 18-250. With less CA too.


Best at 250mm, and best (cropped) at 100mm plus a crop of a 250mm  
shot. Mind you, these were shot at jpeg, 5 stars, 16 mp.


http://tinyurl.com/8dt4ag5


Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-24 Thread Bob Sullivan
Joe,
What about a bean bag in the car...
Regards,  Bob S.

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
 On Oct 24, 2012, at 14:52 , Bruce Walker wrote:

 On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org 
 wrote:
 Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:

 If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for
 macro.

 I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not saying it isn't
 there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention span  :-)

 That's a Mark! right there.


 The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.

 I think that covers most macro usage. Detailed macro work is almost
 always going to be on a tripod.

 I ran some tests a year ago that showed me, personally, that my tripod images 
 were either equal or better with SR on than with SR off. Same with a 2 second 
 delay and SR. But with a 12 sec delay, off was better.

 I was headed out to the dog park yesterday afternoon (a grey and rainy day) 
 and noticed a couple of our favorite birds sittin' on the swim to platform 
 in Palmer Lake. Positioned the car to afford me a shot or two, using the half 
 way up window to steady the camera and 18-250 with. Looking through the 
 viewfinder at 250mm, I was shocked to see how unsteady my hands have become. 
 Tried spot  center AF, MF, and not using the window as a brace, plus 250mm 
 vs 100mm. Think it was between 1/60 and 1/160 of a second with SR on. Nothing 
 was sharp enough for my tastes. Guess I'll have to start lugging to 60-250 
 brick around. A few months ago I got some nice sharp images at the dog park 
 with the lowly 80-300 FA-J that looked better. than this 18-250. With less CA 
 too.

 Best at 250mm, and best (cropped) at 100mm plus a crop of a 250mm shot. Mind 
 you, these were shot at jpeg, 5 stars, 16 mp.

 http://tinyurl.com/8dt4ag5


 Joseph McAllister
 pentax...@mac.com











 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: What about immage stabilization and macro

2012-10-24 Thread Joseph McAllister

On Oct 24, 2012, at 16:37 , Brian Walters wrote:

 Quoting Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com:
 
 On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org 
 wrote:
 Quoting Toine to...@repiuk.nl:
 
 If I remember correctly the manual claims SR should be switched off for
 macro.
 
 I don't recall seeing that in the K200D or K-5 manuals - not saying it 
 isn't
 there, but they are large manuals and I have a short attention span  :-)
 
 That's a Mark! right there.
 
 
 The manuals do say to switch SR off if the cameras are tripod mounted.
 
 I think that covers most macro usage. Detailed macro work is almost
 always going to be on a tripod.
 
 I ran some tests a year ago that showed me, personally, that my tripod 
 images were either equal or better with SR on than with SR off. Same with a 
 2 second delay and SR. But with a 12 sec delay, off was better.
 
 
 Ah, now.  Are you absolutely sure about that 2 sec delay mode?
 
 One thing I did find in the manuals (in the short periods of mental 
 alertness) is that SR is turned off automatically whenever a self timer mode 
 is selected

Any of you dealing with ADD/ADHD know damn well that one cannot read a manual, 
let alone a book. Once your mind gets a chance, it flips the mental page to 
whatever you were just reminded of, and no ability to back up, unless something 
else you are doing in the near to far distant future reminds you of the manual, 
or book. Then you have to -a. find the bloody thing -b. start reading again 
from the front, 'cause you know you won't know where you left off -c. repeat.

I'll have to check on that if and when I find the box with my manuals in it. I 
do remember the movers picking up the bookshelf then rolled it upside down so 
it's contents were spread around on the carpet. Either that or the stapled-on 
back of the bookcase fell off..  Only checking because it seems there has been 
a run of bad memory today.

Dave Brooks! If I didn't go back and spell check, then read slowly what I've 
written for context, thanks to spell checkers changing words to what you think 
they might be, my posts would be mucho more unreadable than yours. Fingers get 
fatter, and don't go where you aim them much once you're decrepit. I have a 
hard time using my iPad if I allow my hand to hover waiting to tap the next 
whatever. Finger tremble, have their own mind about when to tap. Makes for 
frustrating backing up. Guess it won't be long before they're fitting me with a 
cheek-switch and eye tracking apparatus.


Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com
--
The Big Bang was silent, and  invisible in it's beginning moments.
Photons were one of the earliest particles to develop, 
but I don't think any were able to escape for a bit.
If they could, there would have been a flash during expansion.
No one would notice, of course, for another 4.2 billion years.
Now we are trying to catch up by looking out, and back in time
to that infinitesimally-small fraction of a millisecond in an attempt 
to see what caused that singularity to we call the Big Bang. This attempt 
will fail in any visual way, as the furthest galaxies and elements 
are now moving faster than light by recent theory, making the 
information sought beyond a theoretical event horizon.

— update to the Pentaxian's thoughts on particle physics, so far.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.