SV: Simple K1000 Lens Question

2002-10-27 Thread arkibladt
Well, the 135mm pulls in more - graeter magnification. But the 100mm is
faster=brighter screen/vievfinder=easier focusing/better in low light -
about half a stop. Which one you prefere really depends on what you are
shooting. I find the 100mm better for indoor shooting and protraits - the
135mm often gets you too close. Outdoor I'd prefere the 135mm.
Regards
Jens

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: John Gill [mailto:johngill;email.com]
Sendt: 27. oktober 2002 18:45
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Simple K1000 Lens Question


After a 30 year absence from photography I'm back and re starting almost
where I left off-fully manual.Only this time with Pentax,the K1000.
I am having great fun with my two M series lenses,28/3.5 and 50/1.4, my 50/2
will be passed on, I think. My question is,how different is the M135/3.5
from the 100/2.8 for pulling in ,more distant subjects? I have no interest
in doing portraits at this time-just more reach for candids.
Best,
John
--
__
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup





SV: Simple K1000 Lens Question

2002-10-27 Thread arkibladt
...and a 2.5/135mm (qiute rare) whoich is great! (unfortunately I let mine
go...)
Jens

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: John Gill [mailto:johngill;email.com]
Sendt: 27. oktober 2002 18:45
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Simple K1000 Lens Question


After a 30 year absence from photography I'm back and re starting almost
where I left off-fully manual.Only this time with Pentax,the K1000.
I am having great fun with my two M series lenses,28/3.5 and 50/1.4, my 50/2
will be passed on, I think. My question is,how different is the M135/3.5
from the 100/2.8 for pulling in ,more distant subjects? I have no interest
in doing portraits at this time-just more reach for candids.
Best,
John
--
__
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup