Re: Spot Metering Question

2001-04-25 Thread Dan Scott

I'll do that. In case like this, I'd be best off shooting with a print
film, correct? Doesn't print film have a wider exposure range (but less
density) than slide film?

Thanks,
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Two stops over a spot meter reading of the white area only should give
you white with subtle details. But for an important shot like that I
would bracket from about 2 1/2 over to 1 1/2 over if you're not real
familiar with the highlight characteristics of the film you're using. I
shot a Snow Fountain Weeping Cherry Tree that was in blossom yesterday.
The blossoms dominated the frame, but there was some grass in the
foreground and some yellow daffodils and tulips under the tree. The
blossoms are snow white, of course. I used Ektachrome 100VS and exposed
two stops over, which gave me great blossoms. I also exposed some frames
1 and 1 1/2 over. The blossoms in the 1 over frames were definitely too
gray. In the 1 1/2 over frames the blossoms were acceptable but slightly
dull, however the grass in the foreground was, of course, more saturated
than in the 2 over frames. I haven't looked at them all with a loupe
yet, but the 2 over exposures appear to be the best overall.

Dan Scott wrote:

 Hi Paul,

 Is this white white with subtle details or white as in blown out
 highlights? My reason for asking is Prickly Poppies (large white blossoms
 on gray grey foliage) are fixing to be in season here, and I'd like to get
 good detail in the blossoms.

 Thanks,
 Dan Scott
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Meters think everything is 18% gray. So, yes, if you want white to look
 white, you add two stops more exposure to the meter reading you get on a
 white subject. If you want black to look black, you subtract
 approximately two stops from the meter reading you get on a black
 object. You can see what the ambient light is by reading an 18% gray
 card with the meter. It should approximate your calculated exposures. In
 other words the reading from the white dress plus two stops should be
 close to the reading you take on the gray card in the same light (with
 the gray card held at the same angle to the light source as the white
dress).
 Paul

 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .



-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Spot Metering Question

2001-04-25 Thread CDCook1951
I want to thank the group for some good responces on spot metering. My next 
question would be how do you determine a gray equivilent? Would a red be the 
same as black? Would a light blue be medium gray? Please excuse my lack of 
knowledge, I just want to fine tune my skills! Thanks..Craig


Re: Spot Metering Question

2001-04-25 Thread Bob Blakely



Ah... no. There really is no color equivalent to 18% gray. Red is not 
equivalent to black. There are all sorts of blues with varying degrees of 
reflectance.

I've thought about what I do with a spot meter and now realize that I have 
no real method whatsoever. I suspect this may be a bad thing. Over time I've 
simply become used to what the film  the equipment does. I may use the spot 
meter on something I know I would want to be about like my 18% gray cardif 
I was shooting BW. I may point the meter at what I think is an important 
part of the image or a part of the image whose effect on the film I know, take a 
reading and adjust exposure with the idea that I know I want it darker or 
lighter than the card would be - although I don't actually think about an actual 
card. Sometimes I shoot both the lighter parts and the darker partsthat I 
want some detail in and adjust to keep this range within the latitude of the 
film. Mostly, I just adjust the camera for what my experience is for the 
conditions and adjust for changes and to hell with the meter. Actually, I can do 
better with a center weighted meter because it's _consistent_ in what it does. 
It always reacts the same way. Then I make adjustments for the scene or subject 
or whatever knowing (now intuitively)why the CW meter told me what it did. 


Keep in mind that I'm just a hack, but I do believe that there is no 
substitute for burning copious amounts offilm, taking notes on each shot 
(as possible) and making notes on the results. This implies that one retains 
control over exposure.

Maybe I need help.
Regards,Bob...

Give blood. Play hockey.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 8:35 
  AM
  Subject: Re: Spot Metering Question
  I want 
  to thank the group for some good responces on spot metering. My next 
  question would be how do you determine a gray equivilent? Would a red be 
  the same as black? Would a light blue be medium gray? Please excuse my 
  lack of knowledge, I just want to fine tune my skills! 
  Thanks..Craig 


Re: Spot Metering Question

2001-04-25 Thread William Robb


- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 25, 2001 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: Spot Metering Question


 I want to thank the group for some good responces on spot
metering. My next
 question would be how do you determine a gray equivilent?
Would a red be the
 same as black? Would a light blue be medium gray? Please
excuse my lack of
 knowledge, I just want to fine tune my skills!
Thanks..Craig

Unfortunately, no. With a few exceptions (in camera spot meters
are not one of them) light meters are not colour blind. For
example, my beloved LX's (all three) share a particularly
disturbing trait. The meters are exceptionally sensitive to
yellow, and if yellow predominates in the scene, it will
underexpose the film. Note this is after taking the film
manufacturers speed loss into consideration.
Here is how you can check your meter.
Load a roll of real black and white film (Tri-X, FP-4, etc) into
your camera. Now, go out and photograph colours. Fill the frame
completely with them. Use the same lens and leave the lens at
infinity focus, you are not looking for detail anyway. Use the
light meters reccomended settings. Point the camera at the north
sky on a clear day and make an exposure. Point it at a red barn
and do the same thing. Do you have a big green bath towel?
Photograph it. Try this experiment with at least a dozen
different colours.
When you process the film, look at the densities of the
negatives. If they are all the same, your meter is colour
neutral. More likely, the densities of the negatives will be all
over the place.
If you have access to a densitometer (most good photolabs have
one), you can repeat the test with colour negative film. Get
your friendly lab tech to read the visual (colour integrated)
negative densities.
William Robb


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Spot Metering Question

2001-04-25 Thread PAUL STENQUIST

Yes, print (negative) film is probably the best choice when you're
concerned about range. However I generally shoot transparency film,
because I don't want to put myself in the hands of a lab tech when it
comes to nailing the color, and I don't want a stack of 4x6 prints. But
negative film is a good choice when you're dealing with extremes. If
you're shooting only the white blossoms and the gray foliage, you should
be fine with either transparency film or negative film.
Paul

Dan Scott wrote:
 
 I'll do that. In case like this, I'd be best off shooting with a print
 film, correct? Doesn't print film have a wider exposure range (but less
 density) than slide film?
 
 Thanks,
 Dan Scott
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Two stops over a spot meter reading of the white area only should give
 you white with subtle details. But for an important shot like that I
 would bracket from about 2 1/2 over to 1 1/2 over if you're not real
 familiar with the highlight characteristics of the film you're using. I
 shot a Snow Fountain Weeping Cherry Tree that was in blossom yesterday.
 The blossoms dominated the frame, but there was some grass in the
 foreground and some yellow daffodils and tulips under the tree. The
 blossoms are snow white, of course. I used Ektachrome 100VS and exposed
 two stops over, which gave me great blossoms. I also exposed some frames
 1 and 1 1/2 over. The blossoms in the 1 over frames were definitely too
 gray. In the 1 1/2 over frames the blossoms were acceptable but slightly
 dull, however the grass in the foreground was, of course, more saturated
 than in the 2 over frames. I haven't looked at them all with a loupe
 yet, but the 2 over exposures appear to be the best overall.
 
 Dan Scott wrote:
 
  Hi Paul,
 
  Is this white white with subtle details or white as in blown out
  highlights? My reason for asking is Prickly Poppies (large white blossoms
  on gray grey foliage) are fixing to be in season here, and I'd like to get
  good detail in the blossoms.
 
  Thanks,
  Dan Scott
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Meters think everything is 18% gray. So, yes, if you want white to look
  white, you add two stops more exposure to the meter reading you get on a
  white subject. If you want black to look black, you subtract
  approximately two stops from the meter reading you get on a black
  object. You can see what the ambient light is by reading an 18% gray
  card with the meter. It should approximate your calculated exposures. In
  other words the reading from the white dress plus two stops should be
  close to the reading you take on the gray card in the same light (with
  the gray card held at the same angle to the light source as the white
 dress).
  Paul
 
  -
  This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
  go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
  visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
 
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Spot Metering Question

2001-04-25 Thread PAUL STENQUIST

I find that medium red, medium green and light blue are all pretty close
to 18% gray in terms of reflectivity. Get a gray card and go outside and
experiment with meter readings of various colors and the gray card
reading. It doesn't take long to develop a feel for what the degree of
reflectivity you can expect from various colors and surfaces.
Paul

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I want to thank the group for some good responces on spot metering. My
 next
 question would be how do you determine a gray equivilent? Would a red
 be the
 same as black? Would a light blue be medium gray? Please excuse my
 lack of
 knowledge, I just want to fine tune my skills! Thanks..Craig
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Spot Metering Question

2001-04-24 Thread CDCook1951
Finally found the group after quite a while. I remember somebody posting a 
correction chart when spot metering. Example, add 2 stops if subject was a 
white color such as a wedding dress. Is this still the way? I purchased a 
PZ1p and was wondering if I let the metering system do it, ot do I 
compensate? Thanks.Craig


Re: Spot Metering Question

2001-04-24 Thread Tiger Moses

At 03:22 PM 4/24/01 EDT, you wrote:
Finally found the group after quite a while. I remember somebody posting a 
correction chart when spot metering. Example, add 2 stops if subject was a 
white color such as a wedding dress. Is this still the way? I purchased a 
PZ1p and was wondering if I let the metering system do it, ot do I 
compensate? Thanks.Craig

yep, if SPOT metering, and not metering something aprox 18% grey, then if
you meter something white and wnat it white +2
if you meter somehting BLACK and want it BLACK then -2
or use the ZONE SYSTEM

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Spot Metering Question

2001-04-24 Thread Dave Evans

My first thought is that, no matter the meter, it thinks the subject is 18% gray 
(or13%, depending on your local guru). 

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/24 12:22 PM 
Finally found the group after quite a while. I remember somebody posting a 
correction chart when spot metering. Example, add 2 stops if subject was a 
white color such as a wedding dress. Is this still the way? I purchased a 
PZ1p and was wondering if I let the metering system do it, ot do I 
compensate? Thanks.Craig

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Spot Metering Question

2001-04-24 Thread PAUL STENQUIST

Meters think everything is 18% gray. So, yes, if you want white to look
white, you add two stops more exposure to the meter reading you get on a
white subject. If you want black to look black, you subtract
approximately two stops from the meter reading you get on a black
object. You can see what the ambient light is by reading an 18% gray
card with the meter. It should approximate your calculated exposures. In
other words the reading from the white dress plus two stops should be
close to the reading you take on the gray card in the same light (with
the gray card held at the same angle to the light source as the white dress).
Paul

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Finally found the group after quite a while. I remember somebody
 posting a
 correction chart when spot metering. Example, add 2 stops if subject
 was a
 white color such as a wedding dress. Is this still the way? I
 purchased a
 PZ1p and was wondering if I let the metering system do it, ot do I
 compensate? Thanks.Craig
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: Spot Metering Question

2001-04-24 Thread Dan Scott

Hi Paul,

Is this white white with subtle details or white as in blown out
highlights? My reason for asking is Prickly Poppies (large white blossoms
on gray grey foliage) are fixing to be in season here, and I'd like to get
good detail in the blossoms.

Thanks,
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Meters think everything is 18% gray. So, yes, if you want white to look
white, you add two stops more exposure to the meter reading you get on a
white subject. If you want black to look black, you subtract
approximately two stops from the meter reading you get on a black
object. You can see what the ambient light is by reading an 18% gray
card with the meter. It should approximate your calculated exposures. In
other words the reading from the white dress plus two stops should be
close to the reading you take on the gray card in the same light (with
the gray card held at the same angle to the light source as the white dress).
Paul


-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .